Effect of Whey on Productive Performance, Litter Moisture, Carcass Characteristics, and Intestinal Histological Indicators in Japanese Quail
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.48165/ijapm.2026.42.1.8Keywords:
Japanese quail, whey, productive traits, carcass characteristics, intestinal histologyAbstract
This study aimed to evaluate the effect of adding whey as a natural feed supplement to drinking water at concentrations of 0%, 5%, 10%, and 20% for 12 hours daily on productive performance, litter moisture, carcass characteristics, intestinal microbiological and morphological indicators in Japanese quail. One hundred and eighty one-day-old, unsexed birds were reared for 42 days and randomly assigned to four treatments, with 3 replicates per treatment and 15 birds per replicate, using a completely randomized design. The results, compared to the control treatment, showed that adding 10% whey resulted in a significant improvement (P < 0.05) in live body weight and weight gain, with no significant differences between treatments in feed intake, feed conversion ratio, or mortality rate. The control treatment showed a significant decrease in litter moisture compared to the treatments with whey addition. Regarding carcass characteristics, the 10% whey treatment resulted in the highest carcass weight, dressing percentage, and heart relative weight, while the 20% whey treatment resulted in the lowest abdominal fat relative weight. No significant differences were found in the relative weights of carcass cuts (breast and thighs) or internal organs (liver, spleen, and Bursa of Fabricius). Microbiologically, Lactobacillus counts increased in the cecum at the 10% level and decreased at the 20% level. In contrast, coliform counts increased only in the 20% treatment, with no significant differences in the other treatments. Histologically, whey addition significantly increased (P < 0.05) villus height in the duodenum, jejunum, and cecum, with the 10% level showing the highest values and the 20% level the lowest. Crypt depth increased in the jejunum and ileum at the 20% level, with no significant change in the duodenum. The 10% treatment significantly increased the ratio of villus height to crypt depth in the duodenum and ileum, while no significant differences were observed in the jejunum. The study concludes that adding 10% whey to drinking water represents the most efficient level for improving growth and intestinal health indicators in Japanese quail, without adverse effects on production efficiency or basic anatomical characteristics.References
AOAC. Official methods of analysis. 13th ed. Association of Official Analytical Chemists; 1980.
Afkami M, Kermanshahi H, Heravi RM. Evaluation of whey protein sources on performance, liver antioxidants, and immune responses of broiler chickens challenged with ethanol. J Anim Physiol Anim Nutr. 2020;104:898–908. https://doi.org/10.1111/jpn.13327
Al-Kahtani SN, Alaqil AA, Abbas AO. Modulation of antioxidant defence, immune response and growth performance by inclusion of propolis and bee pollen into broiler diets. Animals. 2022;12:1658. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani12131658
Alloui MN, Szczurek W. Effects of different dietary levels of whey lactose as a prebiotic disaccharide on productive performance and selected indices of the caecal micro-environment in broiler chickens. Ann Anim Sci. 2017;17:1107–1122. https://doi.org/10.1515/aoas-2017-0021
Anthony JC, Anthony TG, Kimball SR, Jefferson LS. Signaling pathways involved in translational control of protein synthesis in skeletal muscle by leucine. J Nutr. 2001;131:856S–860S. https://doi.org/10.1093/jn/131.3.856S
Ashour EA, Abd El-Hack ME, Alagawany M, Swelum AA, Osman AO, Saadeldin IM, Hamid MA, Hussein EOS. Use of whey protein concentration in broiler diets. J Appl Poult Res. 2019;28:1078–1088. https://doi.org/10.3382/japr/pfz070
Baurhoo B, Ferket PR, Zhao X. Effects of diets containing different concentrations of mannanoligosaccharide or antibiotics on growth performance and intestinal development of broilers. Poult Sci. 2009;88:2262–2272. https://doi.org/10.3382/ps.2008-00562
Corrier D, Hinton A, Ziprin R, De Loach J. Effect of dietary lactose on Salmonella colonization of broiler chickens. Avian Dis. 1990;34:668–676.
Corrochano AR, Buckin V, Kelly PM, Giblin L. Whey proteins as antioxidants and promoters of cellular antioxidant pathways. J Dairy Sci. 2018;101:4747–4761.
De Loach JR, Oyofo BA, Corrier DE, Kubena LF, Ziprin RL, Norman JO. Reduction of Salmonella typhimurium in broiler chickens by milk or whey. Avian Dis. 1990;34:389–392.
Gülşen N, Coşkun B, Umucalilar HD, Inal F, Boydak M. Effect of lactose and dried whey supplementation on growth performance and immune system histology in broilers. Arch Anim Nutr. 2002;56:131–139. https://doi.org/10.1080/00039420214186
Gadde U, Kim WH, Oh ST, Lillehoj HS. Alternatives to antibiotics for maximizing growth performance and feed efficiency in poultry: A review. Anim Health Res Rev. 2017;18:26–45. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1466252316000207
Galal SM, Ibrahim AA, Osman SE, Megahid AA, Rabie AH. Influence of adding propolis and/or whey on productive and physiological performance in broiler chicks. Egypt Poult Sci J. 2025;45(2):105–113.
Guo ZH, Li X, Huang YF, Lan X. Effects of avian leukosis virus on immune organ weight and body weight of chicks. Indian J Anim Res. 2024;58(11):1998–2003. https://doi.org/10.18805/IJAR.B-1294
Hoffman JR, Falvo MJ. Protein—Which is best? J Sports Sci Med. 2004;3:118–130.
Jazi V, Farahi M, Khajali F, Abousaad P, Ferket P, Soumeh EA. Effect of dietary supplementation of whey powder and Bacillus subtilis on growth performance and gut function of Japanese quail. J Anim Physiol Anim Nutr. 2020;104:886–897. https://doi.org/10.1111/jpn.13323
Kaneko K, Tobisa M, Furuse M, Ohashi O. Effect of whey on growth and lipid accumulation in broilers. Jpn Poult Sci. 2004;41(1):1–7.
Kermanshahi H, Heravi RM, Attar A, Pour AR, Bayat E, Zadeh MH, Daneshmand A, Ibrahim SA. Effects of acidified yeast and whey powder on performance and gut morphology of broilers. Rev Bras Cienc Avic. 2017;19:309–316. https://doi.org/10.1590/1806-9061-2016-0351
Laudadio V, Passantino L, Perillo A, Lopresti G, Khan RU, Tufarelli V. Productive performance and histological features of intestinal mucosa in broilers fed different dietary protein levels. Poult Sci. 2012;91:265–270. https://doi.org/10.3382/ps.2011-01675
McReynolds J, Byrd J, Genovese K, Poole T, Duke S, Farnell M, Nisbet D. Dietary lactose and its effect on necrotic enteritis. Poult Sci. 2007;86:1656–1661. https://doi.org/10.1093/ps/86.8.1656
Mozdziak P, Pophal S, Borwornpinyo S, Petitte J. Transgenic chickens expressing β-galactosidase hydrolyze lactose in the intestine. J Nutr. 2003;133:3076–3079. https://doi.org/10.1093/jn/133.10.3076
Ocejo M, Oporto B, Juste RA, Hurtado A. Effects of dry whey powder supplementation on broiler performance and gut health. BMC Vet Res. 2017;13:199–207. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12917-017-1121-5
Phillips C, Hosseintabar-Ghasemabad B, Gorlov IF, Slozhenkina MI, Mosolov AA, Seidavi A. Immunomodulatory effects of natural feed additives for meat chickens. Life. 2023;13:1287. https://doi.org/10.3390/life13061287
SAS Institute Inc. SAS user’s guide: Statistics. Version 9.3. SAS Institute; 2010.
Shariatmadari F, Forbes JM. Performance of broiler chickens given whey in food and/or drinking water. Br Poult Sci. 2005;46:498–505. https://doi.org/10.1080/00071660500190900
Tsiouris V, Kontominas M, Filioussis G, Chalvatzi S, Giannenas I, Papadopoulos G, Koutoulis K, Fortomaris P, Georgopoulou I. The effect of whey on performance, gut health, and bone morphology in broiler chicks. Foods. 2020;9:588. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods9050588
Tulsi A, Momin A, Ayres V. Moisture prediction in chicken litter using hyperspectral data and machine learning. Smart Agric Technol. 2025;11:101058. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atech.2025.101058
Willis WL, Reid L. Effects of dietary probiotic feeding regimens on broiler production. Int J Poult Sci. 2008;7(2):174–183.
Yasar S, Gok MS. Fattening performance of Japanese quails fed fermented grains in whey with citrus pomace. Bull UASVM Anim Sci Biotechnol. 2014;71(1):51–62. https://doi.org/10.15835/buasvmcn-asb:71:1:10083
