Behaviour and Welfare of Indigenous Poultry Breeds
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.48165/ijapm.2024.40.SI.15Keywords:
poultry behaviour, welfare, assessment, welfare standardsAbstract
Poultry production has undergone an enormous expansion and development during last few decades through advances in genetics, nutrition and husbandry which have resulted in improving the productivity. Consequently, the poultry industry has emerged as one of the most dynamic and fastest expanding segments in animal husbandry. It plays a significant role in providing households with a source of nutritious food, income generation, and livelihood support especially in backyard farming systems. Backyard poultry farming is deeply ingrained in cultural practices and poultry birds have cultural and religious significance. Poultry production in India faces several challenges including limited access to veterinary services, biosecurity issues, vulnerability to diseases and high mortality. This paper briefly discusses the behaviours of indigenous poultry birds, its assessment protocols, concepts and indicators of poultry welfare, international welfare guidelines and regulations. The paper also highlights the poultry welfare standards, welfare issues in India and offers a strategy for the mitigation of poultry welfare problem in India.
References
Albentosa, M. J. and Cooper, J. J. (2004). Effects of cage height and stocking density on the frequency of comfort behaviour performed by laying hens housed in furnished cages. Animal Welfare, 13: 419-424
Anderson, K. E., Davis, G. S., Jenkias, P. K. and Corroll, A. S. (2004). Effect of bird age, density and molt on behavioral profiles of two commercial layer strains in cages. Poultry Science, 83: 1–23
Appleby, M.C., Walker, A.W., Nicol, C.J., Lindberg, A.C., Friere, R., Hughes, B.O. and Elson, H.A. (2002). Development of furnished cages for laying hens. British Poultry Science, 43: 489-
500.
Basic Animal Husbandry Statistics (2022). Department of Animal Husbandry and Dairying (DAHD). Government of India, pp
Bhadauria, P., Bhanja, S. K., Kalluri, G., Saran, S., Divya and Majumdar, S. (2019). Productivity, reproduction and welfare status of White Leghorn hens under cage and floor housing systems. Indian Journal of Poultry Science, 54(1): 89-75
Bhadauria, P., Bhanja, S. K., Majumdar, S. and Kolluri, G. (2016). Behavioural inventory and welfare status of young layers under different managemental conditions during winter season. In the proceedings of XXV World’s Poultry Congress, 5-9 September, 2016, Beijing China, Abst. S50009, pp: 474
Bhadauria, P., Bhanja, S.K., Kolluri, G., Saran, S. and Majumdar, S. (2018). Performance and welfare of White Leghorn chicks under different housing systems. Indian Journal of Poultry Science, 53(3): 335-340
Bhanja, S. K. (2016). Poultry Production and Welfare of Birds. In the proceedings of XXXIII Annual Conference of Indian Poultry Science Association and National Symposium, Department of Poultry Science, College of Veterinary Science, Assam Agricultural University, Khanapara, Guwahati-781022 pp: 23-31
Bhanja, S. K. and Bhadauria, P. (2018). Behaviour and welfare concepts in laying hens and their association with housing systems. Indian Journal of Poultry Science 53(1): 1–10.
Bracke, M.B.M. and Hopster H. (2006). Assessing the importance of natural behavior for animal welfare. J. of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics, 19: 77-89
Brambell Report (1965). Report of the Technical Committee to enquire into the welfare of animals kept under intensive livestock husbandry systems. Her Majesty’s Stationery Office, London, UK.
Broom, D.M. (1991). Animal welfare: concepts and measurement. Journal of Animal Science, 69: 4167-1475
Colson, S., Michel, V. and Arnould, C. (2006). Welfare of laying hens housed in cages and in aviaries: what about fearfulness?. Archiv für Geflügelkunde, 70(6): 261-269
FAO, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2011). Poultry Development Review: Poultry welfare in developing countries
FAWC (Farm Animal Welfare Council) (1979). Press statement, December 5, 1979
Greene, J.L. and Cowan, T. (2014). Table egg production and hen welfare: Agreement and legislative proposals CRS report. R42534
Haas, E.N., Nielsen, B.L., Buitenhus, A.J. and Rodenburg, T.B. (2010). Selection on feather pecking affects response to novelty and foraging behavior in laying hens. Applied Animal Behavior Science, 124: 90-96
Hughes, B.O., Gilbert, A.B. and Brown, M.F. (1986). Categorization and causes of abnormal egg shells: Relationship with stress. British Poultry Science, 27: 325-337
Linares, J. A. and Martin, M. (2010). Encyclopedia of Animal Behavior. Poultry, Behavior and Welfare Assessment, Academic Press, USA, pp. 750–756.
Matsui, K., Khalil, A. M. and Takeda, K. (2004). Effect of perches on behaviour, heart rate,body temperature and locomotion activity of caged hens. Journal of Poultry Science, 41: 120-150
Moura, D.J., Nääs, I. A., Pereira, D. F., Silva, R. B. T. R. and Camargo, G. A. (2006). Animal welfare concepts and strategy for poultry production: a review. Revista Brasileira de Ciência Avícola, 8(3): 137-147
Pohle, K. and Cheng, H.W. (2009). Comparative effects of furnished and battery cages on egg production and physiological parameters in White Leghorn hens. Poultry Science,
88(10):2042-51
Rodenburg, T.B., Tuyttens, F.A.M., Reu, K.D., Herman, L., Zoons, J. and Sonck, B. (2008). Welfare assessment of laying hens in furnished cages and non-cage systems: An on-farm comparison. Animal Welfare, 17: 363-373
Roy, P., Kadam, M. M., Rokade, J. J., Bhanja, S. K. Bhaisare, D. B. (2022a). Development of innovative scorecard for assessment of welfare and production performance of commercial layer birds reared at different stocking densities in cages. Indian Journal of Animal Sciences, 92(5): 611-617
Roy, Pinky, Kadam, M. M., Bhaisare, D.B., Bhanja, S. K., and Rokade, J. J. (2022b). Effect of different stocking densities and flock size on welfare and behaviour of White leghorn layers in conventional California cages. Indian Journal of Poultry Science, 57(2): 157-163
Roy, Pinky, Kadam, M. M., Bhanja, S. K., Kurkure, N., Bhaisare, D.B., Rokade, J. J. and Khose, K. K. (2020). Welfare and performance of commercial laying hens in conventional California cages at different stocking densities. Indian Journals of Animal Sciences, 90(9): 1300-
1304
Roy, Pinky, Kadam, M. M., Patil, A R, Rokade, J. J., Bhanja, S. K., Kurkure, N., Bhaisare, D.B., and Pawar, S.B. (2021). Modulation of Stocking Densities in California Cages to Enhance the Production and Welfare of Commercial Laying Hens. Journal of Animal Research. Journal of Animal Research, 11(1): 213-215
Stolba, A. (1981). A family system in enriched pens as novel method of pig housing. In: Alternatives to intensive husbandry systems. Universities Federation for Animal Welfare, Pottersbar, GB, pp: 52-67
Thaxton, J.P., Dozier, W.A., Branton, S.L., Morgan, G.W., Miles, D.W., Roush, W.B., Lott B.D. and Vizzier-Thaxton Y. (2006). Stocking density and physiological adaptive responses of broilers. Poultry Science, 85: 819-824
Vits, A., Weitzenburger, D., Hamann H. and Distl, O. (2005). Production, egg quality, bone strength, claw length, and keel bone deformities of laying hens housed in furnished cages with different group sizes. Poultry Science, 84: 1511-
1519.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
How to Cite
