Effect of micro-nutrients spray on quality attributes of mango (Mangifera indica L.) cv. Amrapalli
Keywords:
Singapore, Afghanistan, FazliAbstract
The mango occupies a pre-eminent place amongst the fruit crops grown in India as the king of fruits. Belonging to the family Anacardiaceae, the mango (Mangifera indica L.) is the fifth most important fruit in the world after apple, citrus, banana, and grape. It is cultivated in more than 100 countries due to its delicious taste, excellent flavor, attractive fragrance, and as an excellent source of vitamins A and C. Mango occupies about 70 percent of the total area under fruits in India, covering 5.51 million hectares. Major mango-producing countries include India (12.53 million tonnes), China (3.67 million tonnes), Mexico (1.67 million tonnes), Thailand (1.80 million tonnes), Pakistan (16.06 million tonnes), Indonesia (1.14 million tonnes), and the Philippines (1.003 million tonnes). India’s share in world mango production was 40.1% as of 2009, a figure that has not substantially increased since then. The total annual mango production in India is estimated at 16.07 million tonnes from 2.4 million hectares (2010-11). All parts of the mango plant have various uses. Both ripe and unripe mangoes are extensively used by the food processing industry to prepare a wide variety of products, such as syrup, jam, squash, juice, cereal flakes, and toffee. Ripe mangoes are also used to make pickles, chutney, slices, amchur, candy, jam, jelly, and preserves from unripe mangoes. The chemical composition of mango varies with the variety and stage of maturity. It is a rich source of carbohydrates as well as vitamins A and C. A comprehensive report has been made on the chemical composition after analyzing more than five varieties of mango, such as Fazli, Chausa, Langra, and Dasheri. Mango is one of the best-exported materials both in fresh and processed forms and is exported to countries including the U.K., U.S.A., France, Kuwait, Bahrain, Afghanistan, Malaysia, Qatar, and Singapore.
Downloads
References
Anonymous. 1964. Agriculture in ancient India. Raychaudhary, S.P. (Tech. Ed.) ICAR, New Delhi.
Bhatt, A., Mishra, N.K., Mishra, D., and Singh, C.P. 2012. Foliar application of potassium, calcium, zinc, and boron enhanced yield, quality, and shelf life of mango cv. Dashehari. Hort. Flora Research Spectrum, 1(4): 300-305.
Kumar, S., Yadav, A.L., Vishwakarma, G., and Yadav, D.K. 2014. Effect of foliar feeding of nutrients and plant growth regulators on vegetative growth and yield of phalsa (Grewia subinaequalis D.C.). Research in Environment and Life Sciences, 7(4): 293-294.
Kundu, S. and Mitra, S.K. 1999. Response of foliar spray of copper, boron, and zinc on yield and quality of guava. Indian Agric, 43 (1-2): 49-54.
Modi, P.K., Verma, L.R., Bhalerao, P.P., Verma, P., and Kha, A.D. 2012. Micronutrient spray effects on growth, yield, and quality of papaya (Carica papaya L.) cv. Madhu Bindu. Madras Agricultural Journal, 7 (9): 500-502.
Panse, V.G. and Sukhatme, P.V. 1967. Statistical method for agricultural workers. ICAR, Pub. New Delhi.
Sadasivam, S. and Thymoli, B. 1987. Practical Manual in Biochemistry, pp.14. Tamil Nadu Agricultural University.
Singh, H.K., Srivastava, A.K., Dwivedi, R., and Kumar, P. 2001. Effect of foliar feeding of micro-nutrients on plant growth, fruit quality, yield, and internal fruit necrosis of aonla cv. Francis. Progress in Horticulture, 33 (1): 83-83.
Singh, L.B. 1960. The mango: Botany, Cultivation, and Utilization. Leonard Hill, London.
Singh, S.K. 2002. Studies on foliar application of nutrients in ber (Zizyphus maurtiana L.) cv. Banarasi Karaka. M.Sc. (Ag.). Thesis submitted to N.D.U.A&T., Kumarganj, Faizabad (U.P.).
Singh, S.R. and Banik, B.C. 2011. Effect of integrated nutrient management on yield and quality in mango cv. Himsagar. Environment and Ecology, 29: 2A, 842-845.
Vishwakarma, G., Yadav, A.L., Singh, H.K., and Singh, J. 2013. Effect of foliar feeding of calcium and boron on yield and quality of aonla (Emblica officinalis Gaertn.) cv. NA-6. Plant Archives, 13(2): 1135-1138.