Mdct Evaluation Of Right Iliac Fossa Pathologies With Special Emphasis On Lymph Nodal Characteristics
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.48165/ijabms.2021.23126Keywords:
Mdct Evaluation, Right Iliac Fossa Pathologies, Special Emphasis, Lymph NodalAbstract
Introduction:Right iliac fossa pathologies are one of the common reasons for right iliac fossa pain & patient presentation to the Emergency department. It may be related to either benign or malignant diseases. Radiological imaging plays a pivotal role in the differential diagnosis among these diseases. Lymphatic involvement of diseases helps us to learn about the nature of the disease and predict the way of progression, hence awareness with the normal lymph node radiological appearance and its suspicious criteria by radiologists is a crucial information for treatment preparation and execution.AIMS AND OBJECTIVES:To describe key imaging findings of various right iliac fossa pathologies.To assess the role of characteristics of lymph nodes in various right iliac fossa pathologies.METHODOLOGY:A total of 50 cases clinically suspected & diagnosed of having right iliac fossa pathology by CECT imaging of abdomen, at the department of Radiodiagnosis, AMC MET Medical college, Maninagar, Ahmedabad were included in this study.CECT was carried out on PHILIPS MX 16 slice CT machine after giving oral, rectal & iv contrast and axial, sagittal and coronal images were obtained.RESULTS:In our study, most common pathology found was acute appendicitis (16/50), followed by ileocaecal tuberculosis (12/50) and non-tuberculous infectious enterocolitis (11/50). The other pathologies encountered were epiploic appendagitis (3/50), caecal malignancy (2/50), diverticulitis (2/50), Crohn’s disease (2/50) and lymphoma (1/50).Discussion & CONCLUSION:CE CT images of abdomen are very helpful in diagnosis of various right iliac fossa pathologies. Demonstration of lymph nodal patterns of enhancement and their characteristics can further help in narrowing the diagnosis of right iliac fossa pathologies.
References
Senior Resident, Department of Ophthalmology, L.G Hospital, AMC Met Medical College, Gujarat University, India
Assistant Professor, Department of Ophthalmology, Shri C.H. Nagri Eye Hospital, Smt. NHL Municipal College, Gujarat University, India
Resident, Department of Ophthalmology, Shri C.H. Nagri Eye Hospital, Smt. NHL Municipal College, Gujarat University, India
Resident, Department of Ophthalmology, Shri C.H. Nagri Eye Hospital, Smt. NHL Municipal College, Gujarat University, India
Senior Resident, Department of Ophthalmology, L.G Hospital, AMC Met Medical College, Gujarat University, India
Assistant Professor, Department of Ophthalmology, Shri C.H. Nagri Eye Hospital, Smt. NHL Municipal College, Gujarat University, India
Resident, Department of Ophthalmology, Shri C.H. Nagri Eye Hospital, Smt. NHL Municipal College, Gujarat University, India
Resident, Department of Ophthalmology, Shri C.H. Nagri Eye Hospital, Smt. NHL Municipal College, Gujarat University, India.
Agarwal S. Endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy for acquired nasolacrimal duct obstruction. J Laryngol Otol. 2009;123(11):1226-1228
Vishwakarma R, Singh N, Ghosh R. A study of 272 cases of endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy. Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2004; 56:259-61
Jin HR, Yeon JY, Choi MY. Endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy: Creation of a large marsupalized lacrimal sac. J Korean Med Sci. 2006; 21:719-23
Bhatia K, Sengupta S, Bhandari M. Learning Curve in External DCR - A Trainee's Perspective. Nepal J Ophthalmol. 2017 Jul;9(18):121-127. doi: 10.3126/nepjoph. v9i2.19255. PMID: 29634700.
Saeed BM. Endoscopic DCR: A 10 Years Personal Experience. Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2019 Nov;71(Suppl 3):2039-2043. doi: 10.1007/s12070-018-1458-5. Epub 2018 Jul 23. PMID: 31763290; PMCID: PMC6848289.
Sobel RK, Aakalu VK, Wladis EJ, Bilyk JR, Yen MT, Mawn LA. A Comparison of Endonasal Dacryocystorhinostomy and External Dacryocystorhinostomy: A Report by the American Academy of Ophthalmology. Ophthalmology. 2019 Nov;126(11):15801585. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2019.06.009. Epub 2019 Jul 26. PMID: 31358391.
] Dolman PJ. Comparison of external dacryocystorhinostomy with nonlaser endonasal dacryocystorhinostomy. Ophthalmology. 2003 Jan;110(1):78 12511350.
]84. doi: 10.1016/s01616420(02)01452 Chong KK, Abdulla HAA, Ali MJ. An update on endoscopic mechanical and powe red 5. PMID: dacryocystorhinostomy in acute dacryocystitis and lacrimal abscess. Ann Anat. 2020 Jan; 227:151408. doi: 10.1016/j.aanat.2019.07.009. Epub 2019 Aug 26. PMID: 31465822.
[ 17 ] Shams PN, Selva D. Acute post Eye (Lond). 2013 Oct;27(10):1130-- operative rhino sinusitis following endon asal dacryocystorhinostomy. 6. doi: 10.1038/eye.2013.147. Epub 2013 Jul 12. PMID: 23846379; PMCID: PMC3806567.
[ 18 ] 2 Amadi AJ. Endoscopic DCR vs External DCR: What's Best in the Acute Setting? J Ophthalmic Vis Res. 017 Jul
[ 19 ]Sep;12(3):251253. doi: 10.4103/jovr.jovr_133_17. PMID: 28791055; PMCID: PMC5525491. Jawaheer L, MacEwen CJ, Anijeet D. Endonasal versus external dacryocystorhinostomy for nasolacrimal duct obstruction. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Feb 24;2(2):CD007097. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007097.pub3. PMID: 28231605; PMCID: PMC6464401.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Jeel Lathiya, Dipti A. Shah
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.