Factors Affecting Students’ Interest In Learning Technology And Livelihood Education (Tle) Competencies In The Junior High Schools In Echague, Isabela
Keywords:
Learner’s Interest, Technology and Livelihood Education, TLE Learning Competencies, TLE Subcomponent, Specialized Courses, Exploratory CoursesAbstract
The Philippine K-to-12 Education Program offers optional courses in Technology and Livelihood Education subject, but factors hinder students' ability to concentrate on specific subcomponents. This study was conducted to identify factors affecting students' interest in learning TLE competencies in Junior High Schools in Echague, Isabela. The study analyzed 297 Grade 8 students taking TLE exploratory courses. Despite having weak interests, students still were interested in learning various subcomponents of various skills in TLE. Salient findings yielded that learners are more interested in learning about TLE competencies despite their perceptions of it being difficult. They are more likely to be interested when they believe they are good at the subject, have the knowledge, and can succeed despite the practical works involved in the TLE subject. They are more likely to be interested in learning its competencies when they enjoy activities, love their practicum, are motivated internally, and prefer TLE over other subjects. Students are more interested in learning competencies when teachers possess adequate materials and necessary competencies to teach the subject. Worst finding, study revealed that they were more interested in studying other subjects than TLE. Stakeholders in the education industry should design a curriculum with specific specialization for incoming Grade 9 learners, providing facilities and equipment for practical works, while being considerate to their interests. Conducting surveys to identify the best TLE specialized courses can increase interest and sustain it. The importance of TLE in students' lives must be emphasized by educators by teaching practical competencies in Home Economics, Agri-fishery Arts, Industrial Arts, and Information and Communication Technology.
Downloads
References
Adigun, Joseph, et. al. (2015). Effect of Gender on Students’ Academic Performance in Computer Studies in Secondary Schools in New Bussa. Borgu Local Government of Niger State, Department of Computer Science, Federal College of Wildlife Management, New Bussa Niger State, Nigeria.
Ariaso, D. & Tancinco, N. (2016). The Plight of Technology and Livelihood Education Teachers in Selected Schools in The Municipality of Naval, Biliran, Philippines. College of Education, Naval State University
Main Campus, P.I. Garcia St. Naval, Biliran, Philippines.
Black S. E., Devereux P.J. Salvanes K.G. (2005). The more the merrier? The effect of family size and birth order on children’s education. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 120(2), 669-700.
Connor, J. (2009). Student Engagement in an Independent Research Project: The Influence of Cohort culture. Journal of Advanced Academics, 21(1), 8-38.
Cook, D.A. & Artino, A.R., Jr. (2016). Motivation to learn: An overview of contemporary theories. Medical Education, 50(10), 997-1014.
Eccles, J., Wigfield, A. & Schiefele, U. (1998). Motivation to succeed. In N. Eisenberg (Ed.), Handbook of child psychology: Vol. 3. Social, emotional, and personality development (5th ed., 1017-1095). John Wiley & Sons.
Gray, J. & Diloreto, M. (2016). Effects of Student Engagement, Student Satisfaction, and Perceived Learning in Online Learning Environments. NCPEA International Journal of
Educational Leadership Preparation, 11(1) ISSN: 2155-9635, National Council of Professors of Educational Administration.
Gregorio, E. (2016). Technology and Livelihood (TLE) Instruction of Technical Vocational and Selected General Secondary Schools in Catanduanes. International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research, 15.
Haan, M.D. (2010). Birth order, family size and educational attainment. Economics of Education Review, 29(4), 576-588.
Harackiewicz, J.M., Smith, J.L. & Priniski, S.J. (2016). Interest Matters: The Importance of Promoting Interest in Education. Policy insights from the behavioral and brain sciences, 3(2), 220-227.
https://doi.org/10.1177/2372732216655542 11. K to 12 TLE Track Home Economics-Cookery Curriculum Guide December 2013.
Lee, J. (2008). Sibling size and investment in children’s education: An Asian instrument. Journal of Population Economics, 21(4), 855- 875.
Li, H., Zhang J., Zhu Y. (2008). The quantity quality trade-off of children in a developing country: Identification using Chinese twins. Demography, 45(1), 223-243.
Mandernach, B.J., Donnelli-Sallee, E. & Dailey-Hebert, A. (2011). Assessing course student engagement. In R. Miller, E. Amsel, B. M. Kowalewski, B.B. Beins, K.D. Keith & B.F. Peden (Eds.), Promoting Student Engagement: Techniques and Opportunities (pp. 277-281).
Society for the Teaching of Psychology, Division 2, American Psychological Association.
Muzenda, A. (2013). Lecturers’ Competences and Students’ Academic Performance. International Journal of Humanities and Social Science Invention, 3(1), Retrieved from http://www.ijhssi.org/papers/v3(1)/Version2/B
Qian, N. (2009). Quantity-quality and the one child policy: The only-child disadvantage in school enrollment in rural China. NBER Working Paper No. 14973. National Bureau of Economic Research.
Riaz, A. & Hussain, M. (2011). Students’ acceptance and commitment to e- learning: Evidence from Pakistan. Proceedings of the 2011 International Conference on Teaching, Learning and Change.
Scheper, E. (2013). Comparing Public and Private Schools. Honors College Capstone Experience/Thesis Projects. Paper 437.
Wangu, M. (2014). The Impact of Gender Differences on Student’s Academic Performance in Secondary Schools in Ndumberi Division. Kiambu County, Kenya in Science Subjects and Languages, Unpublished Thesis.
Wigfield, A. & Eccles, J.S. (2000). Expectancy value theory of achievement motivation. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25, 68- 81.
Wigfield, A., Tonks, Stephen & Klauda, Susan (2016). Expectancy-value theory.
