Safeguarding Athletes' Digital Assets: Addressing Online Intellectual Property Rights in the Sports Industry's Cyber Law Void
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.48165/Keywords:
Safeguarding Athletes, Digital Assets, Property Rights, ports Industry'sAbstract
The sports industry landscape has witnessed remarkable growth, with revenue projected to surpass USD 40 billion by 2027, largely driven by advancements in technology. However, this technological progress doesn't always favor athletes, fans, and sporting organizations. Nevertheless, The era of digital transformation has created a convergence between sports and technology, opening up a plethora of opportunities for athletes to improve their performance, engage with fans, and maximize their commercial opportunities. The intersection of emerging Internet and Communication Technology within the sports industry intricately intertwines with the Sustainable Development Goals. It is incorrect to claim that there is no connection between these two subjects; in fact, their relationship is pervasive and profound. By considering the fundamental principles of Sustainable Development, we can understand Internet Governance as the decision-making process that shapes the global communication and exchange of knowledge over the internet, encompassing various aspects such as access, multi-stakeholder participation, openness, and security. These issues are equally relevant and crucial for safeguarding the rights of athletes and align with Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) set out by the UN (United Nations). Further, Global communication and knowledge exchange play a pivotal role in providing elite sports personalities with a marketable value for their persona. The rise of the Digital era has brought about a paradigm shift in how athletes engage with their fans and capitalize on their brands even in India. Through social media platforms, online streaming services, and e-commerce channels, athletes now have unprecedented opportunities to expand their reach and monetize their image. In the context of Sustainable Development, protecting the intellectual property of the athletes deeply aligns with several SDGs.
References
Adams, J. M. (2013). Flag on the Play: Professional Sports Teams Calling Trademark Infringement on their Superfans. Jeffrey S. Moorad Sports Law Journal, 20, 631.
Deshpande. S. (2020). Cyber Squatting: - A Study of Legal Framework in India, International Journal of Law, Management & Humanities.3(3). 1825-1835.
Elida Gibbs Vs. Colgate Palmolive Ltd. (1983) FSR 94.
Eldrick ‘Tiger’ Woods v Shay Kostiner NAF. (25 September 2006). Case No FA772899.
Glaus, A. R. (2022). The Intersection of Trademark Law, Athletes, and Money: A “Three-Peat”. Marquette Sports Law Review, 32(2), 583.
Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 469.
Information Technology Act, 2000, Section 66.
Jajpura, L., Singha, B., & Nayak, R. (2017). An Introduction to Intellectual Property Rights and their Importance in Indian Context. Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 22, 32-41.
Kaur. R And Aggarwal. R. (2011). Cybersquatting: Legal Implications and Judicial approaches - An Indian Perspective. Computer Law & Security Review. 27. 653-658.
Khan, M. A. (2004). May the Best Merchant Win: The Law of Non-Trademark Uses of Sports Logos. Marquette Sports Law Review, 14, 283-285.
Man United’s is most valuable digital output’ demonstrates the advantages of online-focused media, (2021). MMancunian Matters, https://www.mancunianmatters.co.uk/sport/31082021-man-uniteds-most-valuable-digital-output-demonstrates-the-advantages-of-online-focused-media/ .
Manchester United Ltd And Asia Bureau.com SDN BHD. (2014). KLRCA/ DNDR-268-2014.
Nathenson, I. S. (1997). Showdown at the domain name corral: Property rights and personal jurisdiction over squatters, poachers and other parasites. University of Pittsburgh Law Review, 58(4), 991.
Paras. S. (2020). Intellectual Property Rights in Sports, IJCRT, 4(3).
Patents Act, 1970, Section 3(m) (1970).
R. Ritvik, (n.d) Study of Intellectual Property Laws in Sports Industry Specifically Focusing on Copyright and Trademark
Riis, T., Elholm, T., Nordberg, A., Schwemer, S., & Wallberg, K. (2018). Study on Legislative Measures Related to Online IPR Infringements: A Project Commissioned by the European Union Intellectual Property Office. European Union Intellectual Property Office. https://doi.org/10.2814/36519.
Satyam Infoway Ltd Vs Sifynet Solutions Pvt. Ltd. (2004). AIR 2004 SC 3540.
Serena Williams and Venus Williams v. Eileen White Byrne and Allgolf Consultancy. (2000) Case No. D 2000-1673.
Vitor. M. (2019). Worldwide: The Role of Patents in Sports. Inventa, Mondaq.
WIPO, ‘IP and Sports- Background Brief’ (WIPO). https://www.wipo.int/pressroom/en/briefs/ip_sports.html accessed 17 January 2022.
Yahoo Inc. Vs. Akash Arora & Anr. 1999 IIAD Delhi 229, 78 (1999) DLT 285.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
How to Cite
