Ensuring Teacher’s Job Satisfaction Through Distributed and Instructional Leadership of Chinese School Principals: Mediating Role of Reward, Motivation and Effectiveness
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.48165/sajssh.2024.5114Keywords:
Instructional leadership, Distributed leadership, Job Satisfaction, Reward, Motivation, TeachersAbstract
Teacher performance and satisfaction is influenced through the organizational environment. Thus, this study explores the effectiveness of leadership styles in promoting teacher satisfaction, namely instructional leadership, and distributed leadership. The direct effects of instructional and distributed leadership on teacher’s job satisfaction along with the indirect effects through the mediation of reward, motivation and effectiveness were studied. The data was collected from 342 teachers employed in secondary schools of China, and the overall association among the factors was studied through the application of PLS-SEM. The findings of the study have indicated that instructional and distributed leadership styles are effective for curating the job satisfaction of teachers. Moreover, rewards, motivation, and job effectiveness were found to significantly mediate the association between leadership styles and job satisfaction. The results of the research study offer crucial implications for educational policies by demonstrating how job satisfaction among teachers can be enhanced through the implementation of appropriate leadership styles, emphasizing on reward, motivation, and effectiveness. The study suggests that development of teacher-focused policies and effective remuneration plans will lead towards satisfaction and therefore effective performance in the future.
References
Abu Nasra, M., & Arar, K. (2020). Leadership style and teacher performance: mediating role of occupational perception. International Journal of Educational Management, 34(1), 186- 202.
Amzat, I. H., Yanti, P. G., & Suswandari, S. (2022). Estimating the effect of principal instructional and distributed leadership on professional development of teachers in Jakarta, Indonesia. SAGE Open, 12(3), 21582440221109585.
Anastasiou, S., & Garametsi, V. (2021). Perceived leadership style and job satisfaction of teachers in public and private schools. International Journal of Management in Education, 15(1), 58-77.
Andriani, S., Kesumawati, N., & Kristiawan, M. (2018). The influence of the transformational leadership and work motivation on teachers performance. International journal of scientific & technology research, 7(7), 19-29.
Azlis-Sani, J., Dawal, S. Z. M., & Zakuan, N. (2013). Validity and reliability testing on train driver performance model using a PLS approach. Advanced Engineering Forum,
Azorín, C., Harris, A., & Jones, M. (2020). Taking a distributed perspective on leading professional learning networks. School Leadership & Management, 40(2-3), 111-127.
Baqir, M., Hussain, S., Waseem, R., & Islam, K. A. (2020). Impact of reward and recognition, supervisor support on employee engagement. American International Journal of Business and Management Studies, 2(3), 8-21.
Bektaş, F., Kılınç, A. Ç., & Gümüş, S. (2022). The effects of distributed leadership on teacher professional learning: mediating roles of teacher trust in principal and teacher motivation. Educational Studies, 48(5), 602-624.
Bellibas, M. S., & Liu, Y. (2018). The effects of principals’ perceived instructional and distributed leadership practices on their perceptions of school climate. International Journal of Leadership in Education, 21(2), 226-244.
Bellibaş, M. Ş., Polatcan, M., & Kılınç, A. Ç. (2022). Linking instructional leadership to teacher practices: The mediating effect of shared practice and agency in learning effectiveness. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 50(5), 812-831.
Birhasani, M., & Sulaiman, M. (2022). Correlation Between Principal Instructional Leadership, Achievement Motivation and Teacher Performance through Job Satisfaction in State Elementary Schools in Kandangan District, Hulu Sungai Selatan Regency. International Journal of Social Science And Human Research, 5(06), 2457-2464.
Cansoy, R. (2019). The Relationship between School Principals' Leadership Behaviours and Teachers' Job Satisfaction: A Systematic Review. International Education Studies, 12(1), 37-52.
Cansoy, R., & Parlar, H. (2018). Examining the relationship between school principals’ instructional leadership behaviors, teacher self-efficacy, and collective teacher efficacy. International Journal of Educational Management, 32(4), 550-567.
Chantal, M., Manyange, M., & Asuman, B. (2022). The Relationship between Extrinsic Rewards and Employee Performance of Shyogwe Diocese. group, 19(20), 21.
Davis, F., & Boudreaux, M. K. (2019). Teacher leaders’ perceptions of charter school principals’ instructional leadership practices. Journal of Educational Research and Practice, 9(1), 7.
Francisco, C. D. (2019). School Principals' Transformational Leadership Styles and Their Effects on Teachers' Self-Efficacy. Online Submission, 7(10), 622-635.
Garbin Praničević, D., Spremić, M., & Jaković, B. (2018). Technology and educational leadership: the role of leaders vs. National education policies. In Educational Leadership in Policy: Challenges and Implementation Within Europe (pp. 97-116). Springer.
García Torres, D. (2018). Distributed leadership and teacher job satisfaction in Singapore. Journal of Educational Administration, 56(1), 127-142.
Gashi, A., Kutllovci, E., & Zhushi, G. (2022). E-work evaluation through work–life balance, job effectiveness, organizational trust and flexibility: Evidence from Kosovo during COVID 19. Employee Relations: The International Journal, 44(2), 371-385.
Hallinger, P., Gümüş, S., & Bellibaş, M. Ş. (2020). 'Are principals instructional leaders yet?'A science map of the knowledge base on instructional leadership, 1940–2018. Scientometrics, 122(3), 1629-1650.
Hartinah, S., Suharso, P., Umam, R., Syazali, M., Lestari, B., Roslina, R., & Jermsittiparsert, K. (2020). Retracted: Teacher’s performance management: The role of principal’s leadership, work environment and motivation in Tegal City, Indonesia. Management science letters, 10(1), 235-246.
Hasibuan, S. (2022). The effect of organizational culture, principal leadership and motivation on teacher performance in madrasah. Al-Tanzim: J. Manag. Pendidikan Islam, 6, 41-53.
Hickey, N., Flaherty, A., & Mannix McNamara, P. (2022). Distributed leadership: A scoping review mapping current empirical research. Societies, 12(1), 15.
Hidayat, M., Dimyati, M., & Supardi, S. (2018). Effect of supervision, motivation of achievement and reward to teacher performance with leadership style as variables of moderation. MBA Journal of Management and Business Aplication, 1(2).
Holloway, J., Nielsen, A., & Saltmarsh, S. (2018). Prescribed distributed leadership in the era of accountability: The experiences of mentor teachers. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 46(4), 538-555.
House, R. J. (1996). Path-goal theory of leadership: Lessons, legacy, and a reformulated theory. The leadership quarterly, 7(3), 323-352.
Iskandar, Y., Ardhiyansyah, A., & Jaman, U. B. (2023). The Effect of Leadership, Supervision, and Work Motivation of the Principal on Teacher Professionalism at SMA Yadika
Cicalengka, Bandung Regency. International Conference on Education, Humanities, Social Science (ICEHoS 2022),
Jakobsen, M. L., Kjeldsen, A. M., & Pallesen, T. (2023). Distributed leadership and performance‐ related employee outcomes in public sector organizations. Public Administration, 101(2), 500-521.
Jambo, D., & Hongde, L. (2020). The Effect of Principal's Distributed Leadership Practice on Students' Academic Achievement: A Systematic Review of the Literature. International Journal of Higher Education, 9(1), 189-198.
Joo, Y. H. (2020). The effects of distributed leadership on teacher professionalism: The case of Korean middle schools. International Journal of Educational Research, 99, 101500.
Kamis, A., Saibon, R. A., Yunus, F., Rahim, M. B., Herrera, L. M., & Montenegro, P. (2020). The SmartPLS analyzes approach in validity and reliability of graduate marketability instrument. Social Psychology of Education, 57(8), 987-1001.
Karakose, T., Papadakis, S., Tülübaş, T., & Polat, H. (2022). Understanding the intellectual structure and evolution of distributed leadership in schools: A science mapping-based bibliometric analysis. Sustainability, 14(24), 16779.
Kilicoglu, D. (2018). Understanding Democratic and Distributed Leadership: How Democratic Leadership of School Principals Related to Distributed Leadership in Schools? Educational policy analysis and strategic research, 13(3), 6-23.
Kılınç, A. Ç., & Özdemir, N. (2022). Does distributed leadership matter for student achievement? Evidence from a centralised education system. Educational Studies, 1-21.
Kumari, K., Barkat Ali, S., Un Nisa Khan, N., & Abbas, J. (2021). Examining the role of motivation and reward in employees’ job performance through mediating effect of job satisfaction: An empirical evidence. International Journal of Organizational Leadership, 10(4), 401-420.
Liu, S., & Hallinger, P. (2018). Principal instructional leadership, teacher self-efficacy, and teacher professional learning in China: Testing a mediated-effects model. Educational administration quarterly, 54(4), 501-528.
Liu, Y., Bellibaş, M. Ş., & Gümüş, S. (2021). The effect of instructional leadership and distributed leadership on teacher self-efficacy and job satisfaction: Mediating roles of supportive school culture and teacher collaboration. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 49(3), 430-453.
Lopes, J., & Oliveira, C. (2020). Teacher and school determinants of teacher job satisfaction: A multilevel analysis. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 31(4), 641-659.
Maheshwari, G. (2022). Influence of teacher-perceived transformational and transactional school leadership on teachers’ job satisfaction and performance: a case of Vietnam. Leadership and Policy in Schools, 21(4), 876-890.
Makgato, M., & Mudzanani, N. N. (2019). Exploring school principals’ leadership styles and learners’ educational performance: A perspective from high-and low-performing schools. Africa Education Review, 16(2), 90-108.
Malik, S. H. (2013). Relationship between leader behaviors and employees' job satisfaction: A path-goal approach. Pakistan Journal of Commerce and Social Sciences (PJCSS), 7(1), 209-222.
Misra, S., & Srivastava, K. B. (2018). Team-building competencies, personal effectiveness and job satisfaction: The mediating effect of transformational leadership and technology. Management and Labour Studies, 43(1-2), 109-122.
Nasution, N. (2018). The effect of incentive reward, school principal leadership, work motivation on the performance of senior high school teachers in medan. The New Educational Review, 53, 62-70.
Naz, F., & Rashid, S. (2021). Effective instructional leadership can enhance teachers’ Motivation and improve students’ learning outcomes. sjesr, 4(1), 477-485.
Nurbaeti, S. (2022). Significance of the Influence of Leadership Model, Morale, and Satisfaction on Performance Consistency. PRODUKTIF: Jurnal Kepegawaian dan Organisasi, 1(1), 10-18.
Pinnington, A., Mir, F. A., & Ai, Z. (2023). The significance of general skills training for early career graduates: relationships with perceived organizational support, job satisfaction and turnover intention. European journal of training and development.
Saleem, A., Aslam, S., Yin, H.-b., & Rao, C. (2020). Principal leadership styles and teacher job performance: Viewpoint of middle management. Sustainability, 12(8), 3390.
Samancioglu, M., Baglibel, M., & Erwin, B. J. (2020). Effects of Distributed Leadership on Teachers' Job Satisfaction, Organizational Commitment and Organizational Citizenship. Pedagogical research, 5(2).
Sebastian, J., Allensworth, E., Wiedermann, W., Hochbein, C., & Cunningham, M. (2019). Principal leadership and school performance: An examination of instructional leadership and organizational management. Leadership and policy in schools, 18(4), 591-613.
Shava, G., & Tlou, F. (2018). Distributed leadership in education, contemporary issues in educational leadership. African Educational Research Journal, 6(4), 279-287.
Shiu, E., Pervan, S. J., Bove, L. L., & Beatty, S. E. (2011). Reflections on discriminant validity: Reexamining the Bove et al.(2009) findings. Journal of Business Research, 64(5), 497- 500.
Sirait, L., Junaedi, A. T., Purwati, A. A., & Deli, M. M. (2022). Leadership Style, Motivation, and Organizational Culture on Job Satisfaction and Teacher Performance. Journal of Applied Business and Technology, 3(2), 115-129.
Sunarsi, D., Rohaeni, N., Wulansari, R., Andriani, J., Muslimat, A., Rialmi, Z., Kustini, E., Kristianti, L. S., Rostikawati, D., & Effendy, A. A. (2020). Effect of e-leadership style,
organizational commitment and service quality towards indonesian school performance. Syst. Rev. Pharm, 11, 472-481.
Taber, K. S. (2018). The use of Cronbach’s alpha when developing and reporting research instruments in science education. Research in science education, 48, 1273-1296.
Tirta, A. H., & Enrika, A. (2020). Understanding the impact of reward and recognition, work life balance, on employee retention with job satisfaction as mediating variable on millennials in Indonesia. Journal of Business and Retail Management Research, 14(3), 88-98.
Torbergsen, H., Utvær, B. K., & Haugan, G. (2023). Nursing students' perceived autonomy support by teachers affects their intrinsic motivation, study effort, and perceived learning outcomes. Learning and Motivation, 81, 101856.
Torres, D. G. (2019). Distributed leadership, professional collaboration, and teachers’ job satisfaction in US schools. Teaching and Teacher Education, 79, 111-123.
Wahab, J. A., Mansor, A. Z., Hussin, M., & Kumarasamy, S. (2020). Headmasters' Instructional Leadership and Its Relationship with Teachers Performance. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 8(11), 97-102.
Wang, T. (2018). School leadership and professional learning community: Case study of two senior high schools in Northeast China. In Global Perspectives on Developing Professional Learning Communities (pp. 10-24). Routledge.
Zahed-Babelan, A., Koulaei, G., Moeinikia, M., & Sharif, A. R. (2019). Instructional leadership effects on teachers’ work engagement: Roles of school culture, empowerment, and job characteristics. CEPS Journal, 9(3), 137-156.
Zheng, X., Yin, H., & Li, Z. (2019). Exploring the relationships among instructional leadership, professional learning communities and teacher self-efficacy in China. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 47(6), 843-859.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 South Asian Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.