The Effects of Parenting Styles on Sex-Role Ideologies of Pru West Senior High Students

Authors

  • Amos Amuribadek Adangabe Pedagogy Department -Nusrat Jahan Ahmadiyya College of Education, Box 71- Wa, Ghana.
  • Ankama Mensah Gideon Prang Senior High School Box 14, Prang, Bono East Region, Ghana.
  • Daniel Inkoom Pedagogy Department -Berekum College of Education Box 74, Berekum - Bono Region, Ghana.
  • Dogbey Alice Emmanuella Pedagogy Department -Akatsi College of Education, PMB – Akatsi, Ghana.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.48165/sajssh.2021.2401

Keywords:

Parenting Styles, Sex-Role, Ideology, Pru west

Abstract

No two parents view things in the same way when it comes to raising their children. In this light, the current study attempted to establish a link between parenting methods and gender role ideas. This study used a correlational research design. We selected 300 individuals from a population of 1480 using stratified and simple random selection procedures. The participants' parenting styles were assessed using Buri's (1991) Parental Authority Questionnaire (PAQ), and their sex role beliefs were assessed using Williams and Best's Sex-Role Ideology Scale (SRIS) (1990). Moment of Pearson-Product Correlation was used to determine the relationship between parenting methods and sex role ideology, while regression was utilised to determine the variables' predictions. It was discovered that parenting techniques had no effect on the participants' sex-role ideas. Individuals with an authoritative parenting style, on the other hand, were more likely to develop a more modern sex-role ideology, whereas those with an authoritarian parenting style developed a more conventional sex-role ideology. Additionally, both sex and religion predicted modern and traditional sex-role ideas, respectively. Tribe anticipated an authoritative parenting style without regard for either permissive or authoritarian parenting methods. The study recommends that because parenting styles are related to sex-role ideology, guidance and counselling coordinators should place a premium on the most effective parenting style in order to help students develop an acceptable sex role ideology.

References

Akinade, E. A., & Owolabi, T. (2010). Research methods: A pragmatic approach for social sciences, behavioural sciences and education. Lagos: Connell Publications.

Akotia, C. S., & Anum, A. (2012). The moderating effects of age and education on gender differences on gender role perceptions. Gender and Behaviour, 10(2), 5022-5043.

Ampofo, A. A. (2001). When men speak women listen: Gender socialisation and young adolescents’ attitudes to sexual and reproductive issues. African Journal of Reproductive Health.5(3), 196-212.

Anane, C., Adangabe, A. A., & Inkoom, D. (2021). Coping strategies and perceived support of student-mothers at the university of education, winneba-campus. South Asian Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities, 2(3), 151–169. https://doi.org/10.48165/sajssh.2021.2310

Baumrind, D. (1991). The influence of parenting style on adolescent competence and substance use. The Journal of Early Adolescence, 11(1), 56-95.

Buri, J. (1991). Parental authority questionnaire. Journal of Personality Assessment, 57(1), 110-119.

Chao, R. (2000). The parenting of immigrant Chinese and European American mothers: Relations between parenting styles, socialization goals, and parental practices. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 21(2), 233-248.

Cherry, K., (2010). Parenting styles: the four styles of parenting. Applied Psychology, 51(3), 260-290.

Cohen, L., Manion, L. & Morrison, K. (2011). Research Methods in Education, (7th Ed). London: Routledge.

Conrade, G., &Ho, R. (2001). Differential parenting styles for fathers and mothers: Differential treatment for sons and daughters. Australian Journal of Psychology, 53(1), 29-35.

Crotty, M. (1998). The Foundation of Social Research: Meaning and Perspectives in the Research Process. London: Sage.236pp.

Diekman, A. B., Goodfriend, W., & Goodwin, S. (2004). Dynamic stereotypes of power: Perceived change and stability in gender hierarchies. Sex Roles.50(4), 201-215.

Eagly, A. H. & Wood, W. (1991). Explaining sex differences in social behaviour: a meta-analytical perspective. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin.17, 306-315.

Eagly, A. H. (1987). Sex Differences in Social Behaviour: A Social-Role Interpretation. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.

Eagly, A. H., Wood, W., & Diekman, A. B. (2000). Social role theory of sex differences and similarities: A current appraisal. The Developmental Social Psychology of Gender.123-174.

Etchezahar, E., & Ungaretti, J. (2013). Women stereotypes and ambivalent sexism in a sample of adolescents from Buenos Aires. Journal of Behaviour, Health and Social Issues, 6, 87 – 94.

Gray, D. E. (2013). Doing Research in the Real World. LA: Sage.

Guba, E. G., & Lincoln, Y. S. (1994). Competing paradigms in qualitative research. London: Sage.

Heilman, M. E., Wallen, A. S., Fuchs, D. &Tamkins, M. M. (2004). Penalties for success: Reactions to women who succeed at male gender-typed tasks. Journal of Applied Psychology, 89, 416-427.

Hyde, L. (1993). Social Role Theory. Annual Review of Sex Research, 10(1), 70-99.

Keller, H. & Otto, H. (2009). The cultural socialization of emotion regulation during infancy. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 40 (6), 996-1011.

Kopko, K., (2007). Parenting styles and adolescents. Cornell Cooperative Extension: Cornell University, U.S.A.

Krejcie, R.V. & Morgan, D.W. (1970). Determining sample size for research activities. Educational and Psychological Measurement. 30. 607-610.

Mcleod, S. (2008). In-depth Interview: Researching People. Longman: Cheshire.

Moss, P. (2008). Beyond quality in early childhood education and care-language of evaluation. New Zealand Journal of Teachers’ work. Vol. 5(1), 03 – 12.

Owano, D. A., (2010). Perception of secondary school students on the effects of parenting styles on their academic performance: A case study of Bongo District, Kenya. Kenya: Egerton University.

Peters, S., Kinsey, P., & Malloy, T. E. (2004). Gender and leadership perceptions among African Americans. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 26(1), 93-101.

Pratima, K., & Mahananda, M. (2021). A Research on Level of Loneliness Among Female and Male Students Studying Professional Courses. South Asian Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities, 2(2), 79-85. https://doi.org/10.48165/sajssh.2021.2207

Pring, R. (2000). The ‘false dualism’ of educational research. Journal of Philosophy of Education, 34(2),247-260.

Ribeiro, L. L., (2009). Construction and validation of a four-parenting style scale. California, Arcata: Humboldt State University

Rudman, L. A., & Glick, P. (2001). Prescriptive gender stereotypes and backlash toward agentic women. Journal of Social Issues, 57, 743-762.

Scotland, J. (2012). Exploring the philosophical underpinnings of research: Relating ontology and epistemology to the methodology and methods of the scientific interpretive and critical research paradigms. Qatar: Qatar University.

Sorkhabi, N. (2005). Applicability of Baumrind's parent typology to collective cultures: Analysis of cultural explanations of parent socialization effects. International Journal of Behavioural Development, 29(6), 552-563.

Williams, J. E., & Best, D. L. (1982). Measuring sex stereotypes: A thirty-nation study. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.

Downloads

Published

2021-08-08

Issue

Vol. 2 No. 4 (2021): South Asian Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities (Aug) 2021

Section

Articles

License

Copyright (c) 2022 South Asian Journal of Social Science and Humanities

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

How to Cite

Adangabe, A.A., Gideon, A.M., Inkoom, D., & Emmanuella, D.A. (2021). The Effects of Parenting Styles on Sex-Role Ideologies of Pru West Senior High Students. South Asian Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities, 2(4), 1–26. https://doi.org/10.48165/sajssh.2021.2401
Crossref
Scopus
Google Scholar
Europe PMC