Mapping of Plagiarism Research Output in India: A Scientometric study
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.48165/Keywords:
Scientometric, Mapping, plagiarism, research outpuAbstract
The present study attempts to highlights on the Mapping of plagiarism research output in India. The paper is based on Scientometric analysis of total 792 research articles contributed in Plagiarism during 2014-2018 on Scopus database. The main objective of the study is to analyze the plagiarism research performance of India in national as well as Global contexts, as reflected in the publication output during 2014 – 2018. It was found that In Authorship pattern it was found that Solo Research is Predominant than Collaborative Research. It was seen that researchers used latest documents. Universities are the major contributors. The finding reveals various aspects of the characteristics and patterns of contributions of the study.
Downloads
References
Glossary of Thompson scientific terminology. (2008). the Thompson Corporation. Retrieved
Glossary of Thompson scientific terminology. (2008).
Thompson Corporation. Retrieved from
http://science.thomsonreuters.com/support/patents/patinf/terms/ http://science.thomsonreuters.com/support/patents/patinf/terms/ 2. Bonitz, A., (1999): Bradford’s laws in different disciplines. Annals of Library science and Documentation, 46(4), 133-138.
Khaparde, V.S, Ranveer V.B. & Ambhore Sagar (2014) Mapping of library and information science research based on LISA (2006-2010). Journal of Library, Information and Communication Technology (JLICT) Vol-6 (1-2), 1-10.
Godinho M.S Mandonca and T Pereira (2003), Mapping innovation on innovation data and indicators. In the international workshop on Empirical studies on Innovation in Europe – Urbina: University of Urbino.
Plagiarism research available at https://uark.libguides.com/plagiarism Retrieved on- 6 Feb 2019. 6. Chauhan, Suresh K. (2018) Research on Plagiarism in India during 2002-2016: A Bibliometric Analysis. DESIDOC Journal of Library & Information Technology, Vol. 38, (2), 69-74. 7. Helgesson G, Eriksson S: “Plagiarism in research”, Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 18:1 (2015):91-101
Scopus available at https://www.scopus.com/sourceid/11300153737?origin=sbrowse Retrived on (27 September 2018)
Wen & et. al. (2007). Scientific production of electronic health record research, 1991–2005. Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine, 8 6, 191–196.
Thavamani and Kotti. (2014). Authorship and collaborative patterns in the Chinese Librarianship: an International Electronic Journal, 1996-2013. Chinese Librarianship: an International Electronic Journal, 37.
Khaparde, V. Bibliometric Analysis of Research Publication of Department of Chemistry, Dr. Babasaheb Ambedkar Marathwada University, Aurangabad. Journal of Computer Science & Information Technology. 2013. 1 (1). 65-73.
Khaparde V. S. (2011). Use of Internet by Research Scholars of Social Science Departments of Dr. Babasaheb Ambedkar Marathwada University, Aurangabad. International Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences. Vol. 1(10) August 2011, Center for promoting Ideas, USA.
Khaparde V. S. (2011).Pattern of Information use by Researchers in Library and Information Science, International Journal of Humanities and Social Science. Vol. 1 (12).174-186. 14. Khaparde, V S (2014). Growth and Development of Electronic Theses and Dissertation (ETDs) in India, Journal of Library and Information Sciences, American Research Institute for Policy Development, UK, March 2014, Vol. 2, No. 1, pp. 99- 116 ISSN: 2374-2372.
