Research Productivity of University of Mumbai: A Bibliometric Study

Authors

  • Swati Gupta Research Scholar, Department of Library and Information Science, Babasaheb Bhimrao Ambedkar University, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh 226025, India.
  • Sharad Kumar Sonkar Assistant Professor, Department of Library and Information Science, Babasaheb Bhimrao Ambedkar University, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh 226025, India.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.48165/

Keywords:

Research, Productivity, University, Mumbai, Contributions, bibliometric

Abstract

The present study is to identify the research productivity of University of Mumbai during a period from  2014 to 2018. To achieve the objectives of the study a bibliometric study has been conducted in selected  heritage university. For downloading the data a web of science database has been used. The major  outcomes were the highest number of research productivity published during the year in 2018. It was  found that out of 796 articles single authors were contributed only 96 (12%) articles and rest were the  joint authors. Mostly contributors were the male for the research productivity. The study fulfilled that  research productivity of University of Mumbai which will be helpful for its additional appraisal. 

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

resources during 2006-

Chhatwal, A. (2018). A bibliometric study of world research output on e-resources during 2006

Chhatwal, A. (2018). A bibliometric study of world research output on e 8(1), Pp 8-13.

International Journal of Information Dissemination and Technology, Vol 8(1),

International Journal of Information Dissemination and Technology,

gree of collaboration in

Mishra, R. & Ramesh, D.B. (2018). A study of authorship pattern and degree of collaboration in

Mishra, R. & Ramesh, D.B. (2018). A study of authorship pattern and de 2017. International Journal of Information Dissemination and

business research during 1998-2017. International Journal of Information Dissemination and

business research during 1998

Technology. Vol 8(3), Pp150-153.

Narzary, R. & Murugan, C. (2017). Authorship pattern & collaboration in etri journal: a Narzary, R. & Murugan, C. (2017). Authorship pattern & collaboration in etri journal: a

Narzary, R. & Murugan, C. (2017). Authorship pattern & collaboration in etri journal: a p. 608-622.

. International Journal of Research – Granthaalayah. Vol. 5 (7). Pp. 608

scientrometric study. International Journal of Research

Subramanian, R. & Nammalvar, N. (2017). Age, Gender and Research Productivity: A Study of Subramanian, R. & Nammalvar, N. (2017). Age, Gender and Research Productivity: A Study of

Subramanian, R. & Nammalvar, N. (2017). Age, Gender and Research Productivity: A Study of ntometric Research. Vol. 6(1). Pp. 6-14.

Speech and Hearing Faculty in India. Journal of Scientometric Research. Vol. 6(1). P

Speech and Hearing Faculty in India. Journal of Scie

Thavamani, K. (2017). Authorship Patterns and Collaborative Research in the Journal of Biofuels, Thavamani, K. (2017). Authorship Patterns and Collaborative Research in the Journal of Biofuels,

Thavamani, K. (2017). Authorship Patterns and Collaborative Research in the Journal of Biofuels, 2016. Library Philosophy and Practice (e-journal). 1518.

-2016. Library Philosophy and Practice (e

library association (ila).

Palled, S. (2016). Bibliomatrics study of journal of Indian library association (ila).

Kuri, R., Palled, S. (2016). Bibliomatrics study of journal of

l Library Services. Vol. 6(1). Pp. 49-57.

International Journal of Digital Library Services. Vol. 6(1). P

Shah, A., Sonkar, S.K. &Sinha, K. (2016).Citation Analysis of Journal on Library and Information Science Research During 2005-2014. International Journal of Library Science and Information Management (IJLSIM). Vol.2 (2).

Verma, A., Sonkar, S.K., & Gupta, V. (2015). A Bibliometric Study of the Library Philosophy and Practice (E-Journal) For the Period 2005-2014. Library Philosophy and Practice (E-Journal). 9. Velmurugan, C. (2013). Bibliometric analysis with special reference to Authorship Pattern and Collaborative Research Output of Annals of Library and Information Studies for the Year 2007 – 2012. Vol 3 (3).

Costas, R. & Bordons, M. (2007). The h-index: Advantages, Limitations and its relation with other bibliometric indicators at the micro level. Journal of Informatrics. (1), Pp.193-203. 11. Tower, G., Plummer, J., & Ridgewell, B. (2007). A Multidisciplinary Study of Gender-based Research Productivity in the World’s Best Journals. Journal of Diversity Management. Vol. 2(4). Pp. 23-32.

Lundberg Retrieved from: https://www.mbaofficial.com/mba-courses/research-methodology/ scientific-methods-in-research-methodology/ Access on: 23/04/2018.

University of Mumbai Retrieved from: http://mu.ac.in/portal/ Access on: 23/04/2018. 14. Shiksha Retrieved from: https://www.shiksha.com/ Access on: 23/04/2018.

Published

2019-12-20

How to Cite

Research Productivity of University of Mumbai: A Bibliometric Study. (2019). Library Progress (International), 39(2), 274–284. https://doi.org/10.48165/