Perceptions of Teacher Education Students in Kerala about Information Literacy Skills: An assessment

Authors

  • Cherian K George Librarian, Union Christian College, Aluva, Kerala – 683102 and (Research Scholar, Department of Studies in Library and Information Science University of Mysore, Manasagangothri, Karnataka
  • M Chandrashekara Professor, Department of Studies in Library and Information Science, University of Mysore, Manasagangothri, Karnataka – 570005

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.48165/

Keywords:

Information literacy assessment, teacher education students, student-teacher, information skills, IL competency, Information literacy Kerala, Teacher Education Kerala

Abstract

Information literacy skills are essential for individuals to be life-long learners and to be the catalysts of information  societies. The review of literature shows that there is a dearth of studies on assessment of information literacy (IL)  skills of teacher education students, particularly in India. Assessments of both perceptions of teacher educations  students about their IL competencies and their actual level of IL skills were made in many western countries either  using standardised tools or locally developed tools. The present study is intended to address the gap in literature in  the area of perceptions of student-teachers in Kerala about their IL competencies. A survey was conducted among the  students of teacher education institutions (TEIs) in government, government aided and unaided sectors. Sample  was selected from students specialising in Languages, Mathematics, Natural Sciences, Physical Sciences and Social  Sciences across Kerala. The questionnaire for the purpose was adapted from previously tested ones following ACRL  Standards, and adapted to make it appropriate for the Indian context. Analysis of 772 responses revealed that  teacher education students in Kerala have high level of perceptions about their IL competencies. Previous  investigations reported that when assessments are made, usually students over-estimate or under-estimate their IL  self-efficacies. Therefore, it is recommended that another study to be conducted to assess the actual IL skills of these  students. 

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

American Library Association, P. C. (2000). Presidential Committee on Information Literacy : Final Report Presidential Committee on Information Literacy : Final R ... College & Research Libraries News, 61(3).

Asselin, M. M., & Elizabeth E. Lee. (2002). “I wish if someone had taught me”: Information literacy in a teacher education program. Teacher Librarian, 30(2), 10–17.

Association of College and Research Libraries. (2000). ACRL STANDARDS: Information Literacy Compentency Standards for Higher Education. College & Research Libraries News, 61(3), 207–215.

Bandura, A. (1978). Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Advances in Behaviour Research and Therapy, 1(4), 139–161.

Bandura, A., & Adams, N. E. (1977). Analysis of self-efficacy theory of behavioral change. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 1(4), 287–310.

https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01663995 6. Behrens, S. J. (1994). A conceptual analysis and historical overview of information literacy. College and Research Libraries, 55(4), 309–322.

Beile, P. M. (2005). Development and Validation of the Information Literacy Assessment Scale for Education (ILAS-ED). In University of Central Florida Stars.

Beile, P. M. (2007). ILAS ED: A Standards Based Instrument. In R. Carlsen, K. McFerrin, J. Prince, R. Weber, & D. Willis (Eds.), Proceedings of SITE 2007: Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference (pp. 1250–1256). Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education.

Cameron, L., Wise, S. L., & Lottridge, S. M. (2007). The Development and Validation of the Information Literacy Test. College & Research Libraries, 68(3), 229–236.

Catalano, A. J. (2010a). Evidence Based Library and Information Practice. 21–38.

Catalano, A. J. (2010b). Using ACRL Standards to Assess. Evidence Based Library and Information Practice, 5(4), 21–38.

Connor, L. G. O., Radcliff, C. J., & Gedeon, J. A. (2001). Assessing Information Literacy Skills : Developing a Standardized Instrument for Institutional and Longitudinal Measurement.

Crouse, W. F., & Kasbohm, K. E. (2005). Information Literacy in Teacher Education: A Collaborative Model. The Educational Forum, 69(1), 44–52.

Doyle, M., Foster, B., & Yukhymenko Lescroart, M. A. (2019). Initial development of the perception of information literacy scale (PILS). Communications in Information Literacy, 13(2), 205–227.

EBSS Instruction for Educators Committee. (2011). Information literacy standards for teacher education: Approved by the ACRL Board of Directors, May 11, 2011. College & Research Libraries News, 72(7), 420–436.

Ferguson, J. E., Neely, T. Y., Sullivan, K., & Ferguson, J. E. (2006). Baseline Information Assessment Students of Literacy Biology. Reference & User Services Quarterly, 46(2), 61–

Ferguson, J. E., Neely, T. Y., Sullivan, K., Literacy, I., Jessame, T., & Ferguson, E. (2006). A Baseline Information Literacy

Assessment of Biology Students. 46(2), 61–71. 18. Gammons, R. W., & Inge, L. T. (2017). Using the ACRL framework to develop a student centered model for program-level assessment. Communications in Information Literacy, 11(1), 168–184.

Hebert, A. (2018). Information Literacy Skills of First-Year Library and Information Science Graduate Students: An Exploratory Study. Evidence Based Library and Information Practice, 13(3), 32–52.

Kovalik, C. L., Jensen, M. L., Schloman, B., & Tipton, M. (2010). Information literacy, collaboration, and teacher education. Communications in Information Literacy, 4(2), 145–169.

Krejcie, R. V., & Morgan, D. W. (1970). Determining Sample Size for Research Activities. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 30(3), 607–610.

Kurbanoglu, S. S., Akkoyunlu, B., & Umay, A. (2006). Developing the information literacy self-efficacy scale. 62(6), 730–743.

Lindauer, B. G. (2004). The three arenas of information literacy assessment. Reference and User Services Quarterly, 44(2), 122–129.

Loyd, B. H., & Abidin, R. R. (1985). Revision of the parenting stress index. Journal of Pediatric Psychology, 10(2), 169–177.

Mahmood, K. (2016a). Do People Overestimate Their Information Literacy Skills ? A Systematic Review of Empirical Evidence on the Dunning Kruger Effect Do People Overestimate their Information Literacy Skills ? A Systematic Review of Empirical Evidence on the Dunning Kruger E. 10(2), 199–213.

Mahmood, K. (2016b). Do people overestimate their information literacy skills? A systematic review of empirical evidence on the dunning-kruger effect. Communications in Information Literacy, 10(2), 198–213.

Michalak, R., Rysavy, M. D. T., & Wessel, A. (2017). Students’ perceptions of their information literacy skills: the confidence gap between male and female international graduate students. Journal of Academic Librarianship, 43(2), 100–104.

Neely, T. Y. (2000). Aspects of information literacy: A Sociological and Psychological Study. university of Pittsburgh.

Onyancha, O. B. (2020). Knowledge

visualization and mapping of information literacy, 1975–2018. IFLA Journal, 46(2), 107– 123.

Rosman, T., Mayer, A. K., & Krampen, G. (2015). Combining self-assessments and achievement tests in information literacy assessment: empirical results and recommendations for practice. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 40(5), 740–754. 554

Sample, A. (2020). Historical development of

definitions of information literacy: A literature review of selected resources. The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 46(2), 102116.

Walsh, A. (2009). Information literacy assessment. Journal of Librarianship and Information Science, 41(1), 19–28. https://doi.org/10.1177/0961000608099896

Zurkowski, P. G. (1974). Information service environment: Relationships and priorities, Relatted paper 5.

Published

2022-12-15

How to Cite

Perceptions of Teacher Education Students in Kerala about Information Literacy Skills: An assessment . (2022). Library Progress (International), 42(2), 252–264. https://doi.org/10.48165/