Authorship Pattern and Collaborative Research on Encephalitis

Authors

  • Pushpa Research scholar, Department of Library and Information Science, Karnataka State Akkamahadevi Women’s University, Vijayapur, Karnataka 586105, India
  • T Shantadevi Professor, Department of Library and Information Science, Karnataka State Akkamahadevi Women’s University, Vijayapur, Karnataka 586105, India

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.48165/bpas.2023.43.1.12%20

Keywords:

Authorship Pattern, Collaborative Research, Encephalitis, PubMed

Abstract

The current study intends to examine trends in authorship patterns and collaborative research in the field of  encephalitis. The PubMed database was used as the primary source of data for the study, which considered 19638  papers on encephalitis published between 2013 and 2022.The study investigates several types of collaboration and  collaboration measurements such as the Degree of Collaboration, the Collaborative Index, the collaborative  coefficient and modified coefficient, and the authorship pattern. According to the study's findings, the year-by-year  distribution depicts how scientific production develops year by year, with the highest production in 2021 (14.42%)  and the lowest production in 2018 (7.99%).In the topic of Encephalitis, collaborative authorship accounts for over  90% (18708), whereas single-author publication accounts for only 4.74% (930).It has been observed that  collaborative research is on the rise in this subject. During the study period from 2013 to 2016, the degree of  collaboration ranged from 0.92 to1.01, with an average of 0.97. The average index is now 5.97, up from 5.63 to 6.27.  The collaborative and modified coefficients grew from 0.72 to 0.75, resulting in an average CC of 0.75. Finally, the  research suggests that collaboration is on the rise in the field of encephalitis. 

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Biradar Nirmala, tadasad PG. (2016). Authorship Pattern and collaborative research in economimics. PEARL A journal of library information science. 10(1).

Garg, Kailash. C. et al ... (2009). Bibliometrics of global malaria vaccine research. Health Information and Libraries Journal, 26, 22-31.

Gupta, B.M., & Kumar, S. (2001), citation analysis of theoretical population genetics literature. Library Herald, 39(4), 208-226.

Hadagali, Gururaj. S., &, Gavisiddappa. Anadhalli. (2015). Modeling the growth of Neurology Literature. Journal of Information Science Theory and Practice, 3(3), 45-63.

Lawani SM, (1986). Some bibliometric correlates of quality in scientometric research. Scientometrics. 9(1&2), 13-25.

Ramakrishnan, J., & Ramesh Babu, B. (2007). Literature on hepatitis (1984-2003): a bibliometric analysis. Annals of Library and Information Studies, 54(4), 195-200.

Shridevi Sindagi and Gavisiddappa Anandahalli (2018) Authorship Trends and collaborative research in lung cancer: A time series analysis stud. Library philosophy and practice (e-journal)

Subramanyam K, 1982. Research collaboration and funding in biochemistry and chemical engineering. International Forum on Information and Documentation. 7(4), 26-29.

Published

2023-06-21

How to Cite

Authorship Pattern and Collaborative Research on Encephalitis. (2023). Library Progress (International), 43(1), 110–117. https://doi.org/10.48165/bpas.2023.43.1.12