Moisture Dependent Selected Postharvest Engineering Properties of Ragi (Eleusine coracana) Grown in Northern Hills of India

Authors

  • D Goswami Food Grains and Oilseeds Processing Division, Central Institute of Post Harvest Engineering and Technology, P.O.-PAU Campus, Ludhiana 141 004, Punjab, India Author
  • M R Manikantan Physiology, Biochemistry and Post Harvest Technology Division, Central Plantation Crops Research Institute, Kudlu (Post), Kasaragod 671 124, Kerala, India Author
  • R K Gupta Food Grains and Oilseeds Processing Division, Central Institute of Post Harvest Engineering and Technology, P.O.-PAU Campus, Ludhiana 141 004, Punjab, India Author
  • R K Vishwakarma Food Grains and Oilseeds Processing Division, Central Institute of Post Harvest Engineering and Technology, P.O.-PAU Campus, Ludhiana 141 004, Punjab, India Author

Keywords:

Engineering properties Hardness, Moisture content, Postharvest, Ragi

Abstract

The machines and systems for processing and value addition of ragi are totally  dependent on its postharvest engineering properties. These properties are  further, greatly affected by the moisture content of the grains. As ragi  processing and value addition requires different set of moisture contents, the  present study was aimed at assesment of selceted postharvest engineering  properties of ragi (cv. VL Mandua -315), grown in Himalayan regions of India  as a function of its moisture content (8- 40%, wb). The spatial dimensions,  geometric mean diameter, thousand grain mass, angle of repose, sphericity,  surface area and porosity increased with increasing moisture content of the  grains. The bulk density and true density decreased linearly from 777.50 to  684.99 kg/m3 and from 1270.44 kg/m3to 1236.48 kg/m3, respectively with the  moisture content. The values of static coefficient of friction of ragi against  plywood, mild steel, galvanized iron and glass increased from 0.57, 0.52, 0.35  and 0.30 to 0.83, 0.72, 0.79 and 0.70, respectively. The hardness decreased  with moisture (67.95 N to 37.51 N) whereas toughness first increased from  5.17 Nmm (8% moisture) to 6.91 Nmm (24% moisture) followed by decrease  to 3.97 Nmm at 40% moisture content. 

References

AOAC, 1980. Official methods of analysis. 13th ed. Association of Official Analytical Chemists, Washington, D.C.

Araghi, H.A., Sadeghi, M. and Hemmat, A. 2010. Physical properties of two rough rice varieties affected by moisture content. International Agrophysics, 24: 205-207.

Balasubramanian, S. and Visvanathan, R. 2010. Influence of moisture content on physical properties of minor millets. Journal of Food Science and Technology, 47 (3):279–284.

Chandrasekar, V. and Visvanathan, R. 1999. Physical and thermal properties of coffee. Journal of Agricultural Engineering Research, 73: 227– 234.

Chang, C.S. 1988. Measuring density and porosity of grain kernels using a gas pycnometer. Cereal Chemistry, 65: 13-15.

Coskuner, Y. and Karababa, E. 2007. Physical properties of coriander seeds (Coriandrum sativum L.). Journal of Food Engineering, 80: 408–416.

Gopalan, C., Rama Sastri, B.V. and Balasubramanian, S.C. 1989. Nutritive value of Indian foods. National Institute of Nutrition. ICMR, Hyderabad. 156p.

Hauhouot-O’Hara, M., Criner, B.R., Brusewitz, G.H. and Solie, J.B. 2000. Selected physical characteristics and aerodynamic properties of cheat seed for the separation of wheat. Agricultural Engineering International: the CIGR E-journal, 2: 1-14.

Helmy, M.A. 1995. Determination of static friction coefficient of some Egyptian agricultural products on various surface. Misr Journal of Agricultural Engineering, 12: 267-281.

Jain, R.K. and Bal, S. 1997. Properties of pearl millet. Journal of Agricultural Engineering Research, 66: 85–91.

Joshi, H.C. and Katoch, K.K. 1990. Nutritive value of millets: A comparison with cereals and pseudocereals. Himalayan Research and Development, 9: 26-28.

Joshi, D.C., Das, S.K. and Mukherjee, R.K. 1993. Physical properties of pumpkin seed. Journal of Agricultural Engineering Research, 54: 219–229.

Kaleem, F.H., Ismail, Z.E. and Abd Hakim, G.R. 1993. Factors affecting grain cleaning efficiency (Part 1): Grain straw mixture and blower characteristics. Misr Journal of Agricultural Engineering, 10: 369-382.

Kiani, M.K.D., Minaei, S., Maghsoudi, H. and Varnamkhasti, M.G. 2008. Moisture

dependent physical properties of red bean

(Phaseolus vulgaris L.) grains. International Agrophysics, 22: 231-237.

Malleshi, N.G. and Desikachar, H.S.R. 1981. Studies on the suitability of roller flourmill, hammer mill and plate grinder for obtaining refined flour from malted ragi (Eleusine coracana). Journal of Food Science and Technology, 18: 37-39.

Malleshi, N.G. 2006. Decorticated finger millet (Eleusine coracana) and a process for preparing the decorticated finger millet. US Patent No.7029720 B2.

Sahoo, P.K. and Srivastava, A.P. 2002. Physical properties of okra seed. Biosystems Engineering, 83: 441–448.

Sajeev, M.S., Manikantan, M.R., Kingsly, A.R.P., Moorthy, S.N. and Sreekumar, J. 2004. Texture analysis of taro (Colocasia esculenta L. Schott) cormels during storage and cooking. Journal of Food Science, 69: 315–321.

Singh, K K. and Goswami, T.K. 1996. Physical properties of cumin seed. Journal of Agricultural Engineering Research, 64: 93–

Singh, K.P., Mishra, H.N. and Saha, S. 2010. Moisture-dependent properties of barnyard millet grain and kernel. Journal of Food Engineering, 96: 598–606.

Soliman, N.S. 1994. Effect of moisture content on angle of repose of paddy rice and its products. Misr Journal of Agricultural Engineering, 11: 163-173.

Subramanian, S. and Visvanathan, R. 2007. Bulk density and friction coefficient of selected minor millet grains and flours. Journal of Food Engineering, 81: 118–126.

Swami, S.S. and Swami, S.B. 2010. Physical properties of finger millet (Eleusine coracana). International Journal of Agricultural Engineering, 3: 156-160.

Ushakumari, S.R., Rastogi, N.K. and Malleshi, N.G. 2007. Optimization of process variables for the preparation of expanded finger millet using response surface methodology. Journal of Food Engineering, 82: 35-42.

Varnamkhasti, M.G., Mobli, H., Jafari, A., Keyhani, A.R., Soltanabadi, M.H., Rafiee, S. and Kheiralipour, K. 2008. Some physical properties of rough rice (Oryza sativa L.) grain. Journal of Cereal Science, 47: 496- 501.

Vishwakarma, R.K., Shivhare, U.S. and Nanda, S.K. 2011. Physical properties of guar seeds. Food and Bioprocess Technology, 5(4):1364-1371.

Visvanathan, R., Palanisamy, P.T., Gothandapani, L. and Sreenarayanan, V.V. 1996. Physical properties of neem nut. Journal of Agricultural Engineering Research, 63: 19– 25.

Zewdu, A.D. and Solomon, W.K. 2007. Moisture dependent physical properties of tef seed. Biosystems Engineering, 96(1):57-63.

Zewdu, A.D. and Solomon, W.K. 2008. Moisture dependent physical properties of grass pea (lathyrus sativus. L.) seeds. Agricultural Engineering International: the CIGR Ejournal, 10: FP 06-027.

Published

2015-05-30

How to Cite

Goswami, D., Manikantan, M.R., Gupta, R.K., & Vishwakarma, R.K. (2015). Moisture Dependent Selected Postharvest Engineering Properties of Ragi (Eleusine coracana) Grown in Northern Hills of India. Journal of Postharvest Technology, 3(3), 82–88. Retrieved from https://acspublisher.com/journals/index.php/jpht/article/view/15743