Elucidation of Relationship between Phytophthora Leaf Blight and Fruit Rot in Tomato

Authors

  • Abhijeet Ghatak Department of Plant Pathology, COA, Govind Ballabh Pant University of Agriculture and Technology, Pantnagar (263 145), U.S. Nagar Author
  • Mohammad Ansar Department of Plant Pathology, BAC, Bihar Agricultural University, Sabour (813 210), Author
  • Lajja Vati Ghatak Department of Plant Pathology, COA, Govind Ballabh Pant University of Agriculture and Technology, Pantnagar (263 145), U.S. Nagar Author
  • Rekha Balodi Department of Plant Pathology, COA, Govind Ballabh Pant University of Agriculture and Technology, Pantnagar (263 145), U.S. Nagar Author

Keywords:

Disease progress, Late blight, Phytophthora, Postharvest, Tomato

Abstract

Field experiments were carried out in order to determine the efficacy of  traditional and new fungicides for preharvest and postharvest management to  late blight disease of tomato. Preharvest management was followed by  application of traditional fungicide and combination of fungicides. The  combination of Mancozeb with Cymoxanil and Mancozeb with Phenamidone  rendered fruit rot incidence between 8.0% and 9.3%, indicating most effective  fungicides to manage this disease. Similarly, evaluation of type cultivar  (determinate/indeterminate) response was done in the field. This results the  intimate relation between infection in leaf and infection in fruit for the  determinate cultivars (R2= 0.96). The experiments under high field epidemics (65.0% and 96.5% on leaves and fruits, respectively) have generated  preliminary information on relationship between late blight severity on leaves  and fruit rot incidence. Our study reveals late blight epidemics both on leaves  and on fruits accelerated from the third week of February, which suggests  special attention should be taken during this period. The laboratory  experiments considered assessment of isolates of Phytophthora, and  identification of most virulent isolate of the late blight fungus. Evaluation of  infection and its progress on fruits, collected from fungicide treated plots and  water sprayed plots, was made. Infection on fruits sampled from the plots  treated with previously mentioned combination of fungicides had not  progressed significantly (P < 0.05) compared with the fruits collected from  plots treated with other fungicides. Occurrence of percent infection was  estimated under laboratory in collections of fresh fruit (artificially inoculated)  treated with fungicides. Similar result, as exhibited in the field experiments and experiment on infection progress, was obtained from the postharvest  study. Postharvest management strategy considering fungicide application is  discussed. 

References

Adams, S.S. and Stevenson, W.R. 1990. Water management, disease development and potato production. American Potato J. 67:3- 11.

Bolkan, A.H., Cupertrio, P.B., Dianess, C.J., and Takatsu, A. 1990. Fungi associated with postharvest fruit rots of Carica papaya and

their control in central Brazil. Plant Dis.

Rep. 6:605-607.

Cohen, Y. 1994. Local and systemic control of Phytophthora infestans in tomato plants by

DL-3-amino-n-butanoic acids.

Phytopathology 84:55-59.

Erwin, D.C., and Ribeiro, O.K. 1996. Phytophthora diseases worldwide. American

Phytopathological Society, St. Paul, MN.

Holliday, P. 1980. Fungal disease of tropical crops. Cambridge University press. 340pp.

Matuszak, J.M., Fernandez-Elquezabal, J., Gu, W.K., Villarreal-Gonzalez, M., and Fry,

W.E. 1994. Sensitivity of Phytophthora

infestans population to Metalaxyl in

Mexico: Distribution and dynamics. Plant

Disease 78:911-916.

Platt, H.W. 1985. Controlling potato late blight with systemic-protectant fungicide combinations

of Metalaxyl and Mancozeb. American

Potato J. 62(10):499-510.

Ristaino, J.B., and Johnston, S.A. 1999. Ecologically based approaches to

management of Phytophthora blight on bell

pepper. Plant Dis. 83:1080-1089.

Robertson, G.I. 1968. A laboratory assay for determining pathogenicity of Phytophthora

spp. to tomato, New Zealand Journal of

Agricultural Research, 11(1):211-214.

Schumann, G.L., and Arcy, J.D. 2000. Late blight of potato and tomato. The Plant Health

Instructor. DOI: 10.1094/PHI-I-2000-0724-

Siddiqui, M. W., Chakraborty, I., Mishra, P., Hazra, P., and Ayala-Zavala, J.F. 2015.

Postharvest physicochemical changes in

mutant (dg, ogc, and rin) and non-mutant

tomatoes. Acta Physiologiae Plantarum,

(1), 1-11.

Siddiqui, M. W., Chakraborty, I., Mishra, P., and Hazra, P. 2014. Bioactive attributes of

tomatoes possessing dg, ogc, and rin genes.

Food & Function, 5(5), 936-943.

Siddiqui, M.W., Ayala-Zavala, J.F. and Dhua, R.S. 2013. Genotypic variation in tomatoes

affecting processing and antioxidant

attributes. Critical Reviews in Food Science and Nutrition, DOI:10.1080/10408398.2012.710278

Vishunavat, K., and Kolte, S.J. 2005. Essentials of phytopathological techniques. Kalyani Publishers.

Published

2015-04-30

How to Cite

Ghatak, A., Ansar, M., Ghatak, L.V., & Balodi, R. (2015). Elucidation of Relationship between Phytophthora Leaf Blight and Fruit Rot in Tomato . Journal of Postharvest Technology, 3(2), 50–57. Retrieved from https://acspublisher.com/journals/index.php/jpht/article/view/15738