Effect of gibberellic acid on postharvest shelf-life and quality of tomato

Authors

  • Anusha Sharma Institute of Agriculture and Animal Science, Lamjung Campus, Lamjung Author
  • Amit Khanal Institute of Agriculture and Animal Science, Lamjung Campus, Lamjung Author
  • Bibek Dhital Institute of Agriculture and Animal Science, Lamjung Campus, Lamjung Author

Keywords:

Physiological Weight Loss, Titrable acidity, , Shelf-Life, Total Soluble Solids

Abstract

Tomato is one of the universally grown and widely consumed vegetable with high nutritive and commercial value. High perishable nature of tomato  leads to huge post-harvest losses and thus practices to extend its shelf-life is must. Therefore, this research was carried out to study the effect of  Gibberellic Acid (GA3) on the post-harvest shelf-life and quality of tomato. The research was conducted in the horticulture laboratory of IAAS, Lamjung  Campus with four treatments viz. 0.05% (T1), 0.1% (T2), 0.3% (T3) GA3 and control (T4) in Completely Randomized Design with six replications.  Tomato fruits (var. Dalila) were harvested at the breaker stage in January, 2018. Fruits were kept on trays at room temperature of around 20◦C after  dipping on different GA3 concentrations for 15minutes with. Quality and quantity parameters that serve as indicators of ripening stages viz.  physiological weight loss, color, decay percentage, total soluble solids and titrable acidity and shelf life were studied. Results showed that GA3 has  significant effect on study parameters. Among different GA3 concentrations, treatment with 0.1% GA3 was found to be best with significantly lower  weight loss (2.429%), significantly lower total soluble solid (5.3166) and significantly higher titrable acidity (0.849%). Longer shelf-life (96.33days) was  observed in 0.1% compared to 0.3% (85.667 days) and 0.05% (83 days).Significantly higher weight loss (5.578%) and lower titrable acidity (0.647%)  was observed in control. T2 was found best for post-harvest treatment of tomato. However, its impact on other nutritional aspect and health must be  further investigated before application.  

References

Ahmed, O.K. and P.O. Tingwa.1995.Effect of gibberellic acid on several parameters of ripening banana fruits. Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 3:47-59.

Aworth, O.C. and A.O. Olurunda, 1981. Towards reducing postharvest losses of perishable fruits and vegetables in Nigeria. In proceeding of the National Conference in agriculture. Port Harcourt. Nigeria.

Barber, N.J. and J. Barber. 2002. Lycopene and prostate cancer and prostratic disease, 5:6-12

Ben, R.A. 1986. Prolongation of fruit life after harvest. In handbook of fruit set and development. M. Shaul (Ed).

Bhowmik, S.R. and J.C. Pan. 1992. Shelf-life of mature green tomatoe stored in controlled atmosphere and high humidity. Journal of Food Science, 57: 948-953.

Choudhary, P. 2014. Influence of post-harvest treatments of gibberllic acid, potassium nitrate and silicic acid in tomato. CCS Haryana Agricultural University. Department of Biochemistry

Duguma, D. 2014. Delaying postharvest ripening of tomato by using 2,4- Dichlorophenoxy acetic acid and gibberellic acid. M.Sc. thesis. Haramaya University.

Glick, B.R. 2004. Bacterial ACC deaminase and the alleviation of plant stress. Advanced Applied Microbiology. 56: 291-312.

Gonzalez, G.A., J.G. Buta and C.Y. Wang. 2001. Methyl jasmonate reduces chilling injury symptoms and enhances color development of `kent` mangoes. Journal of Plant Molecular Biology. 19: 69-87.

Gray, J., S. Picton, J. Shabbier, W. Schuch and D. Grierson.1992. Molecular biology of fruit ripening and its manipulation with antiscense genes. Journal of plant Molecular Biology, 19:69-87.

Gupta, A., A. Kawatra and S. Sehgal.2011. Physical-chemical properties and nutritional evaluation of newly developed tomato genotypes. African journal of food sciences and technology. 2(7): 167-172.

Hanson, P. J.T., C.G. Cou, R. Morris and R.T. Openda. 2001. Tomato production. Asian vegetable research development center, 25.

Hidalgo, M.S., E.M. Tecson-Mendoza, A.C. Laurena and J.R. Botella. 2005. Hybrid `Sinta` papaya exhibits unique ACC synthase cDNA ioforms. Journal of biochemistry Molecular Biology, 38: 320-327.

Jaramillo, J., V. Rodriguez, M. Zapata and T. Rengifo. 2007. Good Agricultural Practices in the production of tomato under protected condition: technical manual.

Kader, 1992. Postharvest biology and technology: an overview. In A.A. Kader (eds). Postharvest technology of horticultural crops. University of California. Division of agriculture and Natural Resource. Publication 3311. 15-20

Khachik, F.L., Carvalho, P.S. Bernstein, G.J. Muir, D.J. Zhao, and N.B. Katz, 2002. Chemistry, distribution and metabolism of tomato carotenoids and their impact on human health. Experimental biology and medicine, 227:845-851.

Kumbhar, S.S. and U.T. Desai.1986. Studies on shelf-life of sapota fruits. J. Maharastra Agri. Univ, 11:184-186.

Mattoo, A.K., T.H. Murata, Er. B. Pantastica, K. Chachin, K. Ogata and C.T. Phan. 1975. Chemical changes during ripening and senescence. In: Er. B.Pantastica (Eds). Post harvest physiology, handling and Utilization of tropical and subtropical fruits and vegetables. Pp: 103.

Moad. 2014.Statstical information in Neplease Agriculture.

Moniruzzaman, M., R. Khatoon, M.F.B. Hossian and M.M. Rashid. 2013. Ripening of tomato at different stages of maturity influenced by the postharvest application of ethrel.Kyushu univ. 36:17-30.

Mukharjee, S.K. and M.N. Dutta.1967. Physio-chemical changes in Indian guava (Pisidium guajava)during fruit development. Curr. Sci, 36: 675-678.

Neeta, N.P., B. Gol and T.V. Ramana.2010. Effect of postharvest treatment on physiochemical characteristics of and shelf life of tomato fruits during storage. American-Eurasian Journal of Agriculture and Environment Sciences, 9:470-479.

Nirupama., N.B. Gol and T.V. Ramana. 2010. Effect of postharvest treatments on physicochemical characterstics and shelflife of tomato(Lycopersicon esculentum Mill.) fruits during storage. American-Eurasic J. Agaric & environment sci. 9(5): 470-479

Patil, D.L. and N.G. Magar.1976. Physic-chemical changes in banana fruit during ripening. Journal of Maharastra University,1:95-99.

Rokaya, P.R., D.R. Baral., D.M. Gautam., A.K. Shrestha and K.P. Paudyal. 2016.Effect of postharvest treatments on quality and shelf-life of mandarin (citrus reticulate Blanco). American journal of Plant Sciences. 7.

Senjaliya, H.J., R.P. Rajput, S.N. Galani and G.S Mangaroliya. 2015. Response of different chemical treatment on shelf-life and quality of tomato fruits (cv. GT-1) during storage in summer season. International J. Proc. & postharvest technology. 6(1): 1-5.

Sgherri, C., Z. Kadlecova, A. Pardossi, F. Navari-Izzo and R. Izzo. 2008. Irrigation with diluted seawater improves nutritional value of cherry tomatoes. J. agric. Food chem. 56:3391-3397.

Sudha, R., R. Amutha, S. Muthulaksmi, W. Baby Rani, K. Indira and P. Mareeswari. 2007. Influence of pre and postharvest chemical treatments on physical characteristics of sapota. Research journal of agriculture and siological sci. 3(5): 450-452.

Thapa, D.B., D. Gauchan, K.Timsana and Y.N. Ghimire. 2016.Srijana hybrid Tomato: A potential technology for enterprise development inNepal. NARC publication

Wills, R., D. McGlasson, Graham and D. Joyce. 1988. Postharvest: An introduction to the physiology and handling of fruit, vegetables and ornamentals (4th edition). CAB international. Wallingford Oxen. UK. p:262.

Zomo, S.A., S.M. Ismail, M. Shah Jahan and M.H. Kabir.2014.chemical properties ans shelf life of banana(Musa sapientum L.) as influenced by different postharvest treatments. Scientific Journal of Krishi Foundation, 2:6-17.

Published

2018-11-30

How to Cite

Sharma, A., Khanal, A., & Dhital, B. (2018). Effect of gibberellic acid on postharvest shelf-life and quality of tomato . Journal of Postharvest Technology, 6(4), 82–90. Retrieved from https://acspublisher.com/journals/index.php/jpht/article/view/15656