Efficacy Of Combination Fungicides Against Rice Sheath Blight And Glume Discoloration Diseases In Below Sea Level Wet Land Ecosystem

Authors

  • M Surendran Rice Research Station, Moncompu 688 503, Thekkekara P.O., Alleppey (D.T), Kerala
  • Anet K Thomas Rice Research Station, Moncompu 688 503, Thekkekara P.O., Alleppey (D.T), Kerala
  • Nimmy Jose Rice Research Station, Moncompu 688 503, Thekkekara P.O., Alleppey (D.T), Kerala
  • Vandana Venugopal Rice Research Station, Moncompu 688 503, Thekkekara P.O., Alleppey (D.T), Kerala

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.48165/

Keywords:

Rice, Sheath blight, glume discoloration, combination fungicide

Abstract

Field experiments were conducted at Rice Research Station, Moncompu, Alappuzha, Kerala for four consecutive seasons of Kharif 2017, Rabi 2017-18, Rabi 2018-19 and Kharif 2019 with the objective of evaluation of efficiency of newer and commercially available fungicides against rice sheath blight and glume discoloration diseases.The tested fungicides wereFlusilazole 12.5% + Carbendazim 25% SC, Azoxystrobin 18.2% W/W + Difenoconazole 11.4% W/W, Azoxystrobin 11%+Tebuconazole 18.3%W/W, Tricyclazole 18%+Mancozeb 62%WP, Zineb 68%+ Hexaconazole 4%WP, Mancozeb 50% + Carbendazim 25%WS, Fluxapyroxad 625g/L+Epoxiconazole 62.5G/L EC and Trifloxystrobin 25%+Tebuconazole 50% WG.Amongeight fungicides tested, Tricyclazole 18 % + Mancozeb 62% WP@2.5ml /lwas found most promisingcombination molecule against sheath blight and glume discoloration incidence followed by Zineb 68% + Hexaconazole 4% WP@ 2.5 g /l, Flusilazole 12.5 % + Carbendazim 25% SC @1ml /land Azoxystrobin 18.2% + Difenoconazole 11.4%w/w SC@1.0ml/l. The maximum yield was obtained from Flusilazole 12.5 % + Carbendazim 25% SC(5874 kg/ha) and Tricyclazole 18 % + Mancozeb 62% WP (5795 kg/ha) followed by Mancozeb 50 %+ Carbendazim 25%WS (5675 kg/a) and Zineb 68% + Hexaconazole 4% WP (5668 kg/ha). The control plot recorded with lowest yield of 3688 kg/ha. 

References

Bag, M. K., 2009: Efficacy of new fungicide Trifloxystrobin 25 % + Tebuconazole 50% 75 WG against sheath blight (RhizoctoniasolaniKuhn) of rice, Journal of Crop and Weed, 5: 224-226.

Dath, P. A., 1990: Sheath Blight of Rice and its Management. Associated Publishing Co., Shidipura, Karol Bagh, New Delhi, 129 pp.

Delseny, M., J. Salses, R. Cooke, C. Sallaud andF. Regad, 2001: Rice genomics:Present and future. Plant Physiology and Biochemistry, 39:323-334.

Dev, V.P.S. and C.A. Mary, 1986: Sheath blight control. Int. Rice Res. Newsl.,11(1):22.

Gomez, K.A. and A.A. Gomez, 1984: Statistical Procedures for Agricultural Research. John Willey and Sons, New York, USA, Pages: 640.

Halgekar, N.Y. and G.K.Giri, 2015: Detection of seed borne fungi in rice. Environment and Ecology, 33:1599-1603.

Hossain, K.S., M.A.T. Miah and Bashar, M.A. 2011: Preferred rice varieties, seed source, disease incidence and loss assessment in bankane disease. J. Agrofor. Environ.,5: 125-128.

IRRI. 1996:Standard Evaluation Systems for Rice, International Rice Research Institute, Manila, Philippines, pp 25-26.

Johnson, I., T. Marimuthu, Ramjegathesh, T. Raguchandar, M. Karthikeyan and R. Samiyappan, 2013: Hexaconazole 5 SC for the management of rice sheath blight, Journal of Todays Biological Sciences, Research and Review, 2: 29-35.

Kumar, N. and M.K. Kumar, 2011: Potentiality of new fungicide formulation Captan 70% + Hexaconazole 5% WP against sheath blight and brown leaf spot of rice. In: Nat. Symp. onIntegtrated disease management strategies in relation to climate change in South India. IPS (south zone), India.p. 27 (Abstr.).

Neninger, L.H., E.I.Hidalgo, L.M.Barrios, M.Pueyo, and K.Hongos, 2003:Presentes en semillas de arroz (Oryza sativa L.) en Cuba. Fitosanidad, La Habana. 7:7-11.

Notteghem, J.L., M.Roux-Cuvelier, F.Andre andE. Roumen, 1995:Rice diseases in the Camargue (France). Cahiers Options Mediterranéennes, Camargue. 15:41-44.

Ou, S.H.,1985:Rice disease. 2nd ed. Commonwealth Mycology Institute, Kew, Surrey, England, 380.

Ozer, N.,2004:Determination of the fungi responsible for black point in bread wheat and effects of the disease on emergence and seedling vigour. Trakya University Journal of Natural Sciences, 6:35-40.

Richa, K., I. M.Tiwari, M. Kumari, B. N. Devanna, H. Sonah, A. Kumari, R. Nagar, V. Sharma, J. R. Boteland T. R. Tilakr.sharma, 2016: Functional Characterization of Novel Chitinase Genes Present in the Sheath Blight Resistance QTL: qSBR11-1in Rice Line Tetep. Frontiers in Plant Science, 7: 1-10.

Singh, S. K., V. Shukla, H. Singhand A. P. Sinha, 2004: Current status and impact of sheath blight in rice (Oryza sativa L.) - a review. Agric. Rev., 25(4): 289- 297.

Surendran, M., Reeny Mary Zacharia, S. Leenakumary, V.R.Sheeja, AnjuHaridas, K.P. Vipitha, Remya Remanan, P.K. Ashamol, M.P. Dhanyaand T.S. Ranjana, 2016: Systemic and contact combi fungicides for rice grain discolouration disease control in Kuttanad. Journal of Rice Research,9(1):58- 61.

Surendran, M., Reena Mathew, V.R.Sheeja, Anet K. Thomas and AswathyMuraleedharan, 2019: Management of rice sheath blight disease using commercially available fungicides in Kuttanad. J.Pl.Dis.Sci.,14(1):55-58.

Zare, L.,2013: The casual agent of barley black point disease in certified seed loads in Iran. International Journal of Agriculture and Crop Science, 5:332-335.

Published

2020-04-20

How to Cite

Efficacy Of Combination Fungicides Against Rice Sheath Blight And Glume Discoloration Diseases In Below Sea Level Wet Land Ecosystem . (2020). Journal of Plant Disease Sciences, 15(1), 37–45. https://doi.org/10.48165/