Compatibility Of Native Bacterial Antagonists With Agrochemicals In Chickpea

Authors

  • H K Harsha Department of Plant Pathology, VNMKV, Parbhani (MS), India
  • A T Daunde Department of Plant Pathology, VNMKV, Parbhani (MS), India
  • K T Apet Department of Plant Pathology, VNMKV, Parbhani (MS), India

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.48165/

Keywords:

Agrochemicals, Bacillus spp, Compatibility, Pseudomonas fluorescens

Abstract

An in vitro experiment was conducted with the objective to find out the suitability of combination of agrochemicals (fungicides, insecticides and weedicides) with native bacterial antagonists like Pseudomonas fluorescens and Bacillus spp used in the integrative chickpea crop production. Twenty one agrochemicals were tested for their compatibility. Isolate P. fluorescence (CRSN-PF1) and Bacillus spp. (BRSN-B2) were found highly compatible with seed dressing chemicals (Thiophanate Methyl 45% + Pyraclostrobin 5% FS and Thiamethoxam 30% FS), fungicides (Thiophanate Methyl 70% WP and Copper Oxychloride 50% WP) and weedicides (2,4-D Amine Salt 58% SL, Oxyfluorfen 23.5% EC and Ammonium Salt of Glyphosate 71 % SG). For integrated pest management in chickpea, these agrochemicals along with the respective antagonists are recommended so as to reduce theenvironmental risk due to toxic pesticides and increase the sustainability of chickpea crop production. 

References

Arumuganathan, K. and E.D. Earle, 1991: Nuclear DNA

content of some important plant species. Plant Mol. Biol. Rep.,9: 208-218.

Aswathi, S., R. M. Gade, A.V. Shitole, S.Kapali, and

M. Yogeshwar, 2016: Studies on tolerance and sensitivity of fungal and bacterial bioagents to three pesticides commonly used in agriculture. The Ecoscan, 9:775-781.

Basha, A.S., A. S. Begum, and G. Ragavendra, 2018:

Biochemical characterization of native Pseudomonas

fluorescens strains followed by their compatibility with agrochemicals and phyto-extracts under in vitro. Int. J. Pure App. Biosci., 6(6):117-124.

Beneduzi, A., A. Ambrosiniand and L.M. Passaglia, 2012:

Plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR): Their potential as antagonists and biocontrol agents. Genet. Mol. Bio., 35(4): 1044-1051.

www.appjpds.org

Butler, E. J.,1918: Fungi and Diseases of Plants. Bishen Singh, Mahindra Pal Singh, New Connaught Place, Dehradun Periodical Experts. 42-D, Vivek Vihar, Delhi. 32,547.

Gangwar, G. P., 2013: Compatibility of bacterial bioagent of

bacterial leaf blight of rice with chemical pesticides, commonly used in rice cultivation. Int. J. Agric. Innov. Res.,2(2): 156-159.

Glick, B. R.,1995: The enhancement of plant growth by free living bacteria. Can. J. Microboil., 41: 1376-1381.

Harshita, Sinha, A., J. B. Khan, U. K. Tripathi, V. Ratan, S.

Trivedi, A. Mishra and A. Verma, 2019:In-vitro evaluation of systemic fungicides against Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. lycopersici and their compatibility with bioagents. J. Pharmacognosy Phytochemistry, 8(3):3117-3123.

Kloepper, J.W., 2003: A review of mechanisms for plant growth promotion by PGPR. In: Reddy, M.S., Anandaraj, M., Eapen, S.J., Sarma, Y.R., Kleeper, J.W. (Eds) Proceedings of the Sixth International PGPR Workshop. pp. 81-92.

Kraft, J.M., M. P.Haware, R. M.Jimenez-Diaz, B. Bayaa and M. Harrabi, 1994: Screening techniques and sources of resistance to root rots and wilts in cool season food legumes. Euphytica, 73: 27-39. Malathi, P., R. Viswanathan, P. Padmanaban, D. Mohanraj and A. Ramesh Sunder, 2002: Compatibility of biocontrol agents with fungicides against red rot disease of sugarcane. Sugar Tech., 4(3&4):131-136.

Mohiddin, F.A. and M.R. Khan, 2013: Tolerance of fungal

and bacterial biocontrol agents to six pesticides commonly used in the control of soil borne plant pathogens. Afr. J. Agric. Res., 8(43): 5272-5275. Nandini, M.L.N., S.M. R. Naik, C.H. Ruth and K. Gopal, 2018: Compatibility of biocontrol agents with fungicides used in turmeric cultivation under in vitro conditions. J. Pharmacognosy Phytochemistry, 7(6): 1271-1276.

Prashad, D., V. Ram, I.M. Sharma and S. Sharma, 2014: Compatibility of native potential antagonists with fungicides and essential oils against Corticium salmonicolor, BERK and BR the incitant of pink canker in apple. The Bioscan,9(1):417-423.

Sahane, P.A., J. B. Bhalerao, S. P. Pudake,P. B. Khaire and R. G. Brahmankar, 2021: Evaluation of compatible Pseudomonas isolates and effective fungicides against Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. ciceri (Pot culture). J Pharmacognosy Phytochemistry, 10(1):1139-1144.

Suneeta, P., K. Eraivan Arutkani Aiyanathan, S. Nakkeeran,

and V. Chandrasekhar, 2016: Study of antimicrobial compounds of Bacillus subtilis (PSB5) and its interaction with fungicides against Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. gerberae. Indian J. Sci. Technol.,9(42): 1-6.

www.appjpds.org

Telangre, R.D., S.S. Mane, and R. S. Ghawade, 2013: Efficacy and compatibility of Pseudomonas fluorescens with fungicides in management of pigeon pea wilt. J. Pl. Dis. Sci., 8(1): 33-36.

Verma, J.P., J. Yadav, K. N. Tiwari, Lavakush and V. Singh, 2010: Impact of plant growth promoting rhizobacteria on crop production. Int. J. Agric. Res., 5: 954-983.

Published

2021-10-20

How to Cite

Compatibility Of Native Bacterial Antagonists With Agrochemicals In Chickpea . (2021). Journal of Plant Disease Sciences, 16(2), 133–138. https://doi.org/10.48165/