MORPHOMETRICAL ANALYSIS OF STERNUM BONE FOR SEXUAL DIMORPHISM ESTIMATION– AN AUTOPSY BASED STUDY
Keywords:
Sternum, Sexual Dimorphism, Morphometry, Discriminant Analysis, Logistic Regression AnalysisAbstract
Sexual dimorphism studies on bones relied on both morphological as well as morphometrical analysis. Apart from well established accuracies in skull and pelvis bones for sex differentiation, other bones of the human body were also assessed for same reason. This study was aimed to determine the sexual dimorphism characteristic of sternum bone by morphometrical analysis and also to compare the sex differentiation efficacy by different statistical methods. Length of manubrium (ML), length of mesosternum (MSL), combined length of manubrium and mesosternum (MBL) and sternal index (SI) were measured and calculated from 100 dried sternums of confirmed sex (56 male and 44 female) for sex differentiation in North Indian (Delhi) population. Significant statistical mean differences were observed between two sexes and on applying Discriminant function analysis (univariate and multivariate) along with Logistic regression analysis, 93- 95% and 94-95.6% of sternum were correctly classified respectively. The most reliable single measurement was length of mesosternum (MSL), with a classification rate of 95%, and sternal index was the least sexually dimorphic. Out of identification point, demarking point and limiting point; limiting point appears to be a more useful tool in sex differentiation of sternum. Sternum, thus emerge to be a good adjunct in ascertaining sex in an unknown subject.
References
1. C.J. Kowalski, A commentary on the use of multivariate statistical methods in anthropometric research. Am J Phys Anthropol. 1972; 36:119–31.
2. Acharaya AB, Prabhu S, Muddapur MV. Odontometric sex assessment from logistic regression analysis. Int J Leg Med. 2011; 125:199–204.
3. Singh J, Pathak RK. Morphometric sexual dimorphism of human sternum in a north Indian autopsy sample: sexing efficacy of different statistical techniques and a comparison with other sexing methods. Forensic SciInt 2013; 228:174.e1–174.e10.
4. Singh S, Potturi BR. Greater sciatic notch in sex determination. J Anat. 1978; 125:619–24.
5. Asala SA, Mbajiorgu FE, Papandro BA. A comparative study of femoral head diameters and sex differentiation in Nigerians. Acta Anat. 1998; 162:232– 7.
6. Hunnargi SA, Menezes RG, Kanchan T, Lobo SW, Binu VS, Uysal S. Sexual dimorphism of the human sternum in a Maharashtrian population of India: a morphometric analysis. Leg Med. 2008; 10: 6–10.
7. Ashley GT. The human sternum: the influence of sex and age on its measurements. Journal of Forensic Medicine. 1956; 3(1):27–43.
8. Mall G, Sprinzl G, et al., Clinical morphology of the sternum. Biomedical Technology (Berlin). 1991; 36:288–9.
9. Teige K. Morphometric studies of X-rays of the sternum. Zeitschrift fur Rechtsmedizin. 1983; 90(3):199–204.
10. Macaluso Jr PJ, Lucena J. Estimation of sex from sternal dimensions derived from chest plate radiographs in contemporary Spaniards. Int. J. Legal Med. 2014; 128: 389–95.
11. Garcia-Parra P, Perez Fernandez A, Djorojevic M, Botella M, Aleman I. Sexual dimorphism of human sternum in a contemporary Spanish population. Forensic Sci. Int. 2014; 244 313.e1-313.e9.
12. Ramadan SU, TurkmenN, Dolgun NA, Gokharman D, Menezes RG, Kacar M, Kosar U. Sex determination from measurements of the sternum and fourth rib using multislice computed tomography of the chest. Forensic
Sci. Int. 2010; 197 120.e1-120.e5.
13. Macaluso Jr. PJ. The efficacy of sternal measurements for sex estimation in South African blacks. Forensic Sci. Int. 2010:202 111.e1-111.e7.
14. Franklin D, Flavel A, Kuliukas A, Cardini A, Marks MK, Oxnard C, et al. Estimation of sex from sternal measurements in a Western Australian population. Forensic Sci. Int. 2012; 217 230.e1-230.e5.
15. Torwalt CRMM, Hoppa RD. A test of sex determination from measurements of chest radiographs. Journal of Forensic Sciences. 2005; 50(4):785–90.
16. Dwight T. The sternum as an index of sex and age. Journal of Anatomy and Physiology. 1881; 15:327–30.
17. Dwight T. The sternum as an index of sex, height, and age. Journal of Anatomy. 1890; 24:527–35.
18. McCormick WF, Stewart JH, et al. Sex determination from chest plate roentgenograms. American Journal of Physical Anthropology. 1985; 68:173–95.
19. Stewart JH, McCormick WF. The gender predictive value of sterna length. American Journal of Forensic Medicine and Pathology. 1983; 4(3):217–20.
20. Bongiovanni R, Spradley MK. Estimating sex of the human skeleton based on metrics of the sternum. Forensic Sci. Int. 2012; 219 290.e1-290.e7.
21. Torimitsu S, MakinoY, Saitoh H, Sakuma A, Ishii N, Inokuchi G, et al. Estimation of sex in Japanese cadavers based on sternal measurements using multidetector computed tomography. Leg. Med. (Tokyo). 2015; 17:226–31.
22. Ahmeda AA, Alshammarib FO, Alrafiaahb AS, Almohaisanib AA, Al-Mohrejb OA, Alkubaidan FO. Estimation of sex in a contemporary Saudi population based on sternal measurements using multidetector computed tomography. HOMO - Journal of Comparative Human Biology. 2017; 68:411–21.
23. Gautam RS, Shah GV, et al. The human sternum – as an index of age & sex. Journal of the Anatomical Society of India. 2003; 52(1):20–23.
24. Jit I, Jhingan V, Kulkarni M. Sexing the human sternum. Am. J. Phys. Anthropol. 1980; 53:217–24.
25. Narayan D, Varma HC. Sternal index in U.P. Indian males and females. Journal of the Anatomical Society of India. 1958; 7:71–2.9
26. Dahiphale VP, Baheete BH, et al., Sexing the human sternum in marathwada region, Journal of the Anatomical Society of India. 2002; 51(2):162–7.
27. Dahiphale VP, Baheete BH, Kamkhedkar SG. Sexing the human sternum in Marathwada region. J. Anat. Soc. India. 2002; 51: 162–7.
28. Singh J, Pathak RK. Sex and age related non-metric variation of the human sternum in a Northwest Indian postmortem sample: A pilot study. Forensic Sci. Int. 2013b; 228 181.e1-181.e12.
29. Franklin D, Flavel A, Kuliukas A, Oxnard CE, Marks MK. Cranial sexual dimorphism and anthropological standards: preliminary investigations in a Western Australian population, 64th Annual Meeting of the American Academy of Forensic Sciences, Atlanta, Georgia, February 20, 2012.
30. Kovarovic K, Aiello LC, Cardini A, Lockwood CA. Discriminant function analysis in archaeology: are classification rates too good to be true? J. Arch. Sci. 2011; 38: 3006–18.
31. Bedalov A, Bašiæ Z, Marelja I, Doliæ K, Bukarica K, Missoni S et al. Sex estimation of the sternum by automatic image processing of multi-slice computed tomography images in a Croatian population sample: a retrospective study. Croat Med J. 2019; 60:237-45.
