IMPACT OF HAND SANITIZER ON THE FINGERPRINTS DEVELOPMENTAL TECHNIQUES

Authors

  • Mridu Sharma Research scholar, Amity Institute of Forensic Science, Amity University, Noida, Uttar Pradesh, India
  • Shruti Gupta Assistant professor, Amity Institute of Forensic Science, Amity university, Noida, Uttar Pradesh, India
  • Sudhir Kumar Deputy director, Forensic Science Laboratory, Ghaziabad, Uttar Pradesh, India

Keywords:

latent fingerprints, hand sanitizers, ninhydrin, silver nitrate, iodine fuming, cyanoacrylate

Abstract

Background- The general public’s interest in hand sanitizers has soared after the covid-19 pandemic pestilence. This gave rise to the notion that the use of such hand sanitizers may hinder the visibility of developed fingerprints. Methodology- Based on this hypothesis, a hand sanitizer was tested to see how it affected the detection of fingerprints left behind after use. Fingerprint detection techniques used included: ninhydrin, silver nitrate, iodine fuming and cyanoacrylate method. Result and conclusion- When hand sanitized fingerprints were compared to non-hand sanitized fingerprints, the alcohol-based hand sanitizers improved the visibility of fingerprints developed with ninhydrin and iodine fuming, and marginally improved those developed with silver nitrate and cyanoacrylate method. To determine the longevity of improved developed quality, various parameters such as time since hand sanitizer application prior to fingerprint deposition was tested. 

References

J. Jing, T. Yi, R. Bose, J. McCarthy, N. Tharmalingam, T. Madheswaran, Hand sanitizers: A review on formulation aspects, adverse effects and regulations, Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health, (2020) 17,3326.

S. Chadwick, M. Neskoski, X. Spindler, C. Lennard, C. Roux, Effect of hand sanitizer on the performance

c. Champod, C.J. Lennard, P. Margot, M. Stoilovic, Fingerprints and Other Ridge Skin Impressions, CRC Press, 2016.

B. Yamashita, Latent print development, in: A. McRoberts (Ed.), The Fingerprint Sourcebook, CreateSpace, Independent Publishing Platform, 2011.

D.L. Dyer, K.B. Gerenratch, P.S Wadhams, Testing a new alcohol-free hand sanitizer to combat infection, AORN J. 68 (2) (1998) 239-251.

M. Stoilovic, C. Lennard, Workshop manual, Fingermark Detection & Enhancement, National Centre for Forensic Studies, Canberra, 2012, pp. 134-195.

V.G. Sears, S.M. Bleay, H.L. Bandey, V.J. Bowman, A methodology for finger mark research, Sci. Justice 52 (3) (2012) 145-160.

J.M. Boyce, D. Pittet, Guideline for hand hygiene in health-care settings: recommendations of the

Healthcare Infection Control Practices Advisory Committee and the HICPAC/SHEA/APIC/IDSA Hand Hygiene Task Force, Am. J. Infect. Control 30 (8) (2002) S1–S46.

G. McDonnell, A.D. Russell, Antiseptics and disinfectants: activity, action, and resistance, Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 12 (1) (1999) 147–179.

S. Buffet-Bataillon, P. Tattevin, M. Bonnaure-Mallet, A. Jolivet-Gougeon, Emergence of resistance to antibacterial agents: the role of quaternary ammonium compounds—a critical review, Int. J. Antimicrob. Agents 39 (5) (2012) 381–389.

S.E. Czerwinski, J. Cozean, C. Cozean, Novel water based antiseptic lotion compared with alcohol sanitizer demonstrates rapid, broad-spectrum kill, J. Infect. Public Health 7 (2014) 199–204.

Guidelines for the assessment of fingermark detection techniques. International Fingerprint Research Group, J. Forensic Identif. 64 (2) (2014) 174–200.

Published

2021-07-30

How to Cite

IMPACT OF HAND SANITIZER ON THE FINGERPRINTS DEVELOPMENTAL TECHNIQUES . (2021). Journal of Forensic Medicine & Toxicology, 38(1), 107–111. Retrieved from https://acspublisher.com/journals/index.php/jfmt/article/view/17914