Role of Social Media Use in Democracy
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.48165/JES.2020.36210Keywords:
Individuals, Democracy, Government and Social mediaAbstract
Social networks such as Twitter, Facebook, and Google hold the potential to alter civic engagement, thus essentially hijacking democracy, by influencing individuals towards a particular way of thinking. Today, social media plays a crucial role in facilitating and transmitting content related to all the matters that have larger effect on public opinions and democracy. Due to higher use of social media among new generations, they are exposed to politics more frequently, and in a way that is integrated into their social lives. New media hailed as vehicles for providing a voice to the voiceless. But the restrictions imposed by the government on social media sites and internet services, while allowing only that content that are government friendly amounts to compelled speech. This paper explores how social media have become a platform for fake news and propaganda to influence certain audiences towards a particular way of thinking. When it comes to healthy democratic networks, it is important that the news remains true so it doesn’t affect people levels of trust. A certain amount of trust is very crucial for healthy and well-functioning democratic systems.
Downloads
References
Allen J, Howland B, Mobius M, Rothschild D, Watts DJ. Evaluating the fake news problem at the scale of the information ecosystem. Science Advances. 2020;6(3539).
Amartya KS. Development as Freedom. London: Oxford University Press; 2001.
Antony AK. The cost of internet shutdowns. The Hindu. 2021 Feb 08.
Avello DG. Social media, democracy and democratization. IEEE Multimedia. 2015.
Berry JM, Sobieraj S. The Outrage Industry: Political Opinion Media and the New Incivility. New York: Oxford University Press.
Bhatia G. Fuzzy law, unclear jurisprudence, trampled rights. The Hindu. 2021 Feb 15.
Bimber B, Gil de Zúñiga H. The unedited public sphere. New Media & Society. 2019.
Boler M. Digital Media and Democracy: Tactics in Hard Times. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press; 2010.
Bond RM, Fariss CJ, Jones JJ, Kramer AD, Marlow C, Settle JE, Fowler JH. An experiment in social influence and political mobilization. Nature. 2012;489(7415):295–298.
Breuer A, Landman T, Farquhar D. Social media and protest mobilization: Evidence from the Tunisian revolution. Democratization. 2015;22:764–768.
Castells M. From al-Zarqawi to al-Awlaki: The emergence of the internet as a new form of violent radical milieu. Available from: ISODARCO
Chan M, Chen HT, Lee FLF. Examining the roles of mobile and social media in political participation: A cross-national analysis of three Asian societies using a communication mediation approach. New Media & Society. 2017;19(2):2003–2021.
Chen HT. Spiral of silence on social media and the moderating role of disagreement and publicness in the network: Analyzing expressive and withdrawal behaviors. New Media & Society. 2018;20(10):3917–3936.
Constitution of India. Article 19(2). 1949.
Diehl T. Political persuasion on social media: Tracing direct and indirect effects of news uses and social interaction. News Media & Society. 2015;18(9):1875-1895.
Dilliplane S, Goldman SK, Mutz DC. Televised exposure to politics: New measures for a fragmented media environment. American Journal of Political Science. 2018;57(1):236–248.
Enikolopov R, Maria P, Konstantin S. Social media and corruption. American Economic Journal: Applied Economics. 2018;10(74):150.
Garrett RK. Troubling consequences of online political rumoring. Human Communication Research. 2016;37(2):255–274.
Garrett RK, Weeks BE, Neo RL. Driving a wedge between evidence and beliefs: How online ideological news exposure promotes political misperceptions. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication. 2016;21(5):331–348.
Gastil J, Reedy J, Wells C. Knowledge distortion in direct democracy: A longitudinal study of biased empirical beliefs on statewide ballot measures. International Journal of Public Opinion Research. 2017.
Guess A, Nagler J, Tucker J. Less than you think: Prevalence and predictors of fake news dissemination on Facebook. Science Advances. 2019;5(1):eaau4586.
Hashemi O, Rahman SA. Twitter deception and influence: Issues of identity, slacktivism, and puppetry. Journal of Information Warfare. 2014;13(1):58–71.
Hutchinson A. Social media platform associated with most of the fake news. Press release; 2019.
Isaac M. Facebook trending list skewed by individual judgment, not institutional bias. The New York Times. 2020.
Jamieson KH. Cyberwar: How Russian Hackers and Trolls Helped Elect a President What We Don’t, Can’t, and Do Know. Oxford University Press; 2018.
Jha CK, Sarangi S. Does social media reduce corruption? Information Economics and Policy. 2017;39(60):71.
Jha CK, Tadika OK. Does social media promote democracy and some empirical evidence. SSRN Electronic Journal. 2018;3277152.
Jun Y, Meng R, Johar GV. Perceived social presence reduces fact-checking. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 2018;114(23):5976–5981.
Jungherr A, Schoen H, Posegga O, Jürgens P. Digital trace data in the study of public opinion: An indicator of attention toward politics rather than political support. Social Science Computer Review. 2017;35(3):336–356.
Khan MS, Irfan AK, Ahmad F, Riaz A. The promotion of democratic behavior and the role of media. Journal of Education and Practices. 2015;6(1):222-228.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Journal of Extension Systems
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
