Crop diversification and intensification through groundnut + sweet corn mix/inter cropping systems for enhancing farmers’ income

Authors

  • V P Chovatia Department of Agronomy, College of Agriculture, Junagadh Agricultural University, Junagadh-362001 (Gujarat, India)
  • R K Mathukia Department of Agronomy, College of Agriculture, Junagadh Agricultural University, Junagadh-362001 (Gujarat, India)
  • S K Chhodavadia Department of Agronomy, College of Agriculture, Junagadh Agricultural University, Junagadh-362001 (Gujarat, India)
  • B K Sagarka Department of Agronomy, College of Agriculture, Junagadh Agricultural University, Junagadh-362001 (Gujarat, India)

Keywords:

Crop diversification, intercropping, farmer’s income

Abstract

For crop intensification and diversification as a strategy of doubling farmers’ income, a field experiment was conducted during kharif season of 2016 and 2018 at Junagadh (Gujarat, India) to evaluate groundnut (Arachis hypogaea L.) + sweet corn (Zea mays L.var. saccharata Sturt) mix/inter cropping systems on medium black calcareous soil. Groundnut + sweet corn intercropping in row ratio of 1:1 (replacement series), 2:1, 3:1 and paired row in row ratio of 2:1 (additive series) and mix cropping in 90:10 per cent and 80:20 per cent were compared with sole groundnut and sole sweet corn. The pooled results over three years revealed that the paired row (45-75-45 cm) groundnut + sweet corn (2:1) additive intercropping recorded significantly the highest groundnut pod equivalent yield (GPEY)of 2210 kg ha-1 and land equivalent ratio (LER) of 1.42. The next superior treatments in this regard were groundnut + sweet corn (3:1) additive intercropping and groundnut (90%) + sweet corn (10%) replacement mix cropping having PEY of 1997 & 1765 kg ha-1 and LER of 1.32 & 1.12, respectively. Whereas, the sole sweet corn recorded the lowest GPEY (1191 kg ha-1) and groundnut + sweet corn (1:1) replacement intercropping registered the lowest LER (0.97). The paired row (45-75-45 cm) groundnut + sweet corn (2:1) additive intercropping recorded maximum net returns of ‘ 72880 ha-1 and B:C ratio of 2.94, closely followed by groundnut + sweet corn (3:1) additive intercropping and groundnut (90%) + sweet corn (10%) replacement mix cropping, which gave net returns of ‘ 63497 and 55279 ha-1 and B:C ratio of 2.75 and 2.68, respectively. 

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Adaniyan, O. N.; Akande, S. R.; Balogun, M. O. and Saka, J. O. 2007. Evaluation of crop yield of African yam bean, maize and kenafunder intercropping systems. American-Eurasian Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Sciences, 2: 99-102.

Choudhary, V. K.; Dixit, A. and Kumar, P. S. 2014. Productivity, competition behaviour and weed dynamics of various row proportions of maize (Zea mays)-legumes intercropping in Arunachal Pradesh. Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 84: 1329-1334.

Gomez K, Gomez A. 1984. Statistical Procedures for Agricultural Research, 2nd Edition. John Willey and Sons, New York, p. 680.

Jacob, K. N.; Charlotte, T. D.; Henri, K. K. and Arsene, Z. B. I. 2014. Effect of corn (Zea mays L.) density on the yield and yield component of bambara groundnut [Vigna subterranea (L). Verdc] in woodland savannas of Cote d’Ivoire. Research in Plant Biology, 4: 1-9.

Kumar, S. and Singh, R.P. 1992. Management studies in maize legume intercropping system. Annals of Agricultural Research, 13: 71-74.

Laxminarayana, K. and Munda, G.C. 2004. Performance of rice (Oryzasativa) and maize (Zeamays)-based cropping systems under mid-hills of Mizoram. Indian Journal of Agronomy, 49: 230-232.

Mandal, M. K.; Banerjee, M.; Malik, G. C.; Das, R. and Pathak, A. 2015. Effect of intercrop on productivity, energetic of maize (Zea mays)-legumes based intercropping systems. Environment and Ecology, 33(3A): 1382-1385.

Singh, M. V.; Misra, B. N. and Kumar, N. 2012. Effect of intercrops on yield and economics of maize based intercropping system. Haryana Journal of Agronomy, 28: 28-30.

Singh, M.; Singh, P. and Nepalia, V. 2005. Integrated weed

Treatment GPEY (kg ha-1)

Gross returns (` ha-1)

Cost of

cultivation (` ha-1)

Net

returns (` ha-1)

management studies in maize based intercropping system. Indian Journal of Weed Science, 37: 205-208.

B:C

Thavaprakaash, N. and Velayudham, K. 2007. Effect of crop

T1 1692 84607 32505 52102 2.60 T2 1191 59538 36924 22614 1.61 T3 1383 69144 34715 34430 1.99 T4 1598 79885 37617 42269 2.12 T5 1997 99837 36339 63497 2.75 T6 2210 110497 37617 72880 2.94 T7 1765 88225 32947 55279 2.68 T8 1701 85039 33389 51651 2.55

geometry, intercropping system and INM practices on cob yield and nutrient uptake of baby corn. Asian Journal of Agricultural Research, 1: 10-16.

Willey, R. W. 1979. Intercropping its importance and research needs: Part l- Competition and yield advantage. Field Crop Abstracts, 32: 1-10.

Published

2020-08-22

How to Cite

Chovatia, V.P., Mathukia, R.K., Chhodavadia, S.K., & Sagarka , B.K. (2020). Crop diversification and intensification through groundnut + sweet corn mix/inter cropping systems for enhancing farmers’ income . Journal of Eco-Friendly Agriculture, 15(1), 10–13. Retrieved from https://acspublisher.com/journals/index.php/jefa/article/view/8053