Performance of Mesta (Hibiscus spp.) genotypes under rainfed conditions in the northern transition zone of Karnataka
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5958/2582-2683.2021.00024.1Keywords:
Fibre quality, Fibre yield, Growth, Mesta genotypesAbstract
A field experiment was conducted to study the performance of Mesta genotypes under rainfed conditions for three rainy seasons. The experiment comprised of 11 genotypes, of which nine genotypes (HS-4288, HS-7910, AS-73- CP-560, AMV-1, AMV-2, AMV-3, AMV-4, HS-1 and HS-2) belonged to Hibiscus sabdariffa L. and two genotypes (HC 583 and AMC-108) belonged to H. cannabinus L. The results indicated that among the genotypes AS-73-CP-560 recorded significantly higher fibre yield over the rest of the genotypes except HS-2 and HS-4288 which were at par. HS-2 and AS-73-CP-560 were significantly superior in seed yield over the rest of the genotypes except, HC-583, HS 4288 and AMV-4 which were at par. Whereas, AMV-1, AMV-2 and AMC-108 recorded significantly lower seed yield. A significantly higher fibre equivalent yield was recorded by AS-73-CP-560 and HS-2 over the rest of the genotypes. At harvest genotypes, AS-73-CP-560 and HS-2 were found superior and recorded significantly higher plant height over other genotypes except for AMV-3, AMV-4, HS-1, HS-4288 and HS-7910 which were at par. HS-2 and AS-73- CP-560 were significantly superior in fresh weight of stem over the rest of the treatments, except AMV-4 and HS-4288 which were at par. The total dry weight of stem was significantly higher with AS-73-CP-560 over the rest of the genotypes except HS-2, HS-4288, AMV-4, AMV-2, AMV-3 and HS-1 which were at par. The varieties belonging to H. cannabinus i.e., HC 583 and AMC-108 were found suitable for the vegetable type and showed earliness as compared to the rest of the genotypes belonging to H. sabdariffa.
Downloads
References
Adomson, W. C., Long, F. L. and Bagby, M. O. 1973. Woody core fibre length, cellulose percentage and yield components of kenaf. Agronomy Journal, 67: 57-59.
Babalad, H. B. Guggari, A. K. and Pattanashetty, V. A. 2021. Response of Mesta (Hibiscus spp.) genotypes to stages of harvesting under rainfed conditions. Journal of Eco-friendly Agriculture, 16: 61-66.
Guggari, A. K. and Sheelavantar, M. N 2004. Response of Mesta varieties to plant population and nitrogen levels under dryland conditions. Karnataka Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 17: 207-214.
Iruthayaraj, M. R., Rajendran, P. and Morachan, Y. B. 1981. Effect of dates of harvest on Mesta (Hibiscus cannabinus L.) varieties. Jute Development Journal, 1: 30-33.
Kirby, R. H. 1963. Mallow family. In: World Crop Series, Vegetable fibre. Leonard Hall Ltd., Interscience Publishing Incorporation. New York, pp.108-112.
Krishnamurthy, N., Hunsagi, G., Rudryradhya, M. and Singlachar, M. A. 1994. Effect of nitrogen levels and spacing regimes on physiological parameters in biomass production of Mesta. Current Research, 23: 102-103.
Mehadi Hassan, K. M., Md. Isfatuzzaman Bhuyan, Mohammad Kabirul Islam, Md. Fazlul Hoque, Md. Monirul Islam, Md. Sazedul Islam, Mahbuba Ferdous and Ram Proshad 2018. Performance of some jute and allied fibre varieties in the southern part of Bangladesh. International Journal of Advanced Geosciences, 6: 117-121.
Naidu, M. V., Prasad, P. R. and Lakshmi, M. B. 1996. Influence of species, fertility levels and stage of harvest on biomass production and pulp yield in Mesta (Hibiscus spp.). Acharya N.G. Ranga Agricultural University Journal Research, 24: 1-4.
Pushpa, K., Krishna Murthy, N. and Krishna Murthy, R. 2013. Dry matter accumulation studies at different stages of crop growth in Mesta (Hibiscus cannabinus). African Journal of Agricultural Research, 8: 332-338.
Wilson, F. D., Summas, T. E., Joyner, F. F., Fishler F. D. and Scale, C. C. 1965. Everglades 41 and everglades 71. Two new varieties of kenaf (Hibiscus cannabinus L.) for fibre and seed. University of Florida, Agricultural Experiment Station, Cir.S-168. pp. 12.
Wood, I. M. Angus, J. F. 1974. A review of prospective crops for the Ord irrigation area. II. Fibre crops. Australian Diversified Land Use Research Technical Paper, 36: 1-27.