Development of value added products from subtropical peach

Authors

  • Neelima Garg ICAR-Central Institute for Subtropical Horticulture, Rehmankhera, Kakori, Lucknow-226101
  • Sanjay Kumar ICAR-Central Institute for Subtropical Horticulture, Rehmankhera, Kakori, Lucknow-226101
  • K K Srivastava ICAR-Central Institute for Subtropical Horticulture, Rehmankhera, Kakori, Lucknow-22610
  • Balvindra Singh ICAR-Central Institute for Subtropical Horticulture, Rehmankhera, Kakori, Lucknow-22610
  • Supriya Vaish ICAR-Central Institute for Subtropical Horticulture, Rehmankhera, Kakori, Lucknow-22610

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5958/2582-2683.2021.00016.2

Keywords:

Peach, probiotic drink, candy, chutney, Lactobacillus

Abstract

The laboratory experiment conducted with the aim of developing value added products from Peach (Prunus persica), a soft, juicy and fleshy stone fruit, generally consumed as fresh, resulted in development of a schematic model for processing the fruit in preparing a variety of food products. Fresh fruit slices subjected to lactic acid fermentation in brine solution using Lactobacillus sp for two days led to production of probiotic drink having 1.37 × 105 CFU ml-1 living population of Lactobacillus Sp. The left over slices were utilized in the preparation of sweet candy by dipping these in the increasing concentrations of sugar syrup and later drying to an intermediate moisture level of 12 per cent. The excessive softened slices were utilized in preparation of chutney using various spice ingredients. The sugar syrup left was utilized in the preparation of squash, wine and vinegar. Peach probiotic drink so prepared possessed 0.63 per cent lactic acid and 31.5 mg 100 ml-1 phenolics, The wine contained 9.73 per cent ethanol, 10.2 oB TSS, 1.38 per cent acidity and 143.5 mg 100 ml-1 phenolics, 5.41 per cent acetic acid and 96.8 mg 100 ml-1 phenolics. Peach chutney possessed 78.4 mg 100 g phenolics-1. All the products showed good organoleptic acceptability scoring above 7.0 out of total 9.0. The seeds were used for sowing and raising the fruit crop further. 

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Amerine, M.A., Pangborn, R.M. and Roessler, E.B. 1965. Principles

of Sensory Evaluation of Food. Academic Press, New York,

USA. 602p.

Arora, S. and Aggarwal, P. 2009. Effect of method of preservation

of pulp on the quality of carbonated and non-carbonated

beverages prepared from peach fruit. Journal of Food Quality,

: 695-708. DOI: 10.1111/j.1745-4557.2009.00277.x

Bhattacherjee, A.K., Dikshit, A., Kumar, S. and Tandon, D.K. 2013.

Quality of aonla candy and segments-in-syrup prepared

from steep preserved fruits in water. Indian Journal of Natural

Products Resources, 4: 119-122.

[Standard Deviation : Prob. drink ± 0.5; Candy ± 5.0; Squash ± 2.0; Vinegar ± 3.7; Chutney ± 1.7; Wine ± 0.8]

Fig. 2: Total phenolic contents of peach products [Standard Deviation : Prob. drink ± 0.52; Candy ± 0.38; Squash ± 0.2; Vinegar ± 0.45; Chutney ± 0.1; Wine ± 0.4]

Fig. 3: Sensory evaluation of peach products

(143.5 mg 100 ml-1). Cakar et al. (2016) reported total phenolics content (TPC) range of 584-2414 mg GAE/L for different berry fruits. Peach wine was clear brownish in colour and astringent in taste owing to presence of 9.73 per cent ethanol content besides fair amount of phenolics. Lee (2015) prepared peach wine containing up to 9.2 per cent alcohol. All peach products was found to have good acceptability obtaining sensory scores above 7.0.

CONCLUSION

A schematic model developed for processing of peach fruit to prepare various peach food products viz., probiotic drink, squash, candy, chutney, vinegar and wine, from a single raw material, leaving no by-product unutilized, was recommended to be adopted by the processing industries.

Èakar, U.D., Aleksandar V., Petroviæ, A.V., Živkoviæ, M.B., Vajs, V.E., Milovanoviæ, M.M., Zeravik, J. and Ðorðeviæ, B.I. 2016. Phenolic profile of some fruit wines and their antioxidant properties. Hemijska industrija, 70(6): 661–672. doi: 10.2298/HEMIND150722002C

Caputi, A.Jr., Ueda, M. and Brown, T. 1968. Spectro-photometric determination of ethanol of wine. American Journal of Enology and Viticulture, 19: 160-165.

El-Ishaq, A. and Obirinakem, S. 2015. Effect of Temperature and Storage on Vitamin C Content in Fruits Juice. International Journal of Chemistry and Biomolecular Science, 1: 17-21.

Folin, O. and Ciocalteu, V. 1927. On tyrosine and tryptophane determinations in proteins. Journal of Biological Chemistry, 73: 627-650.

Garg, N., Yadav, K.K., Beg, E., Kumar, S. and Verma, A. 2014. Improved vinegar production through Acetobacter aceti for immobilization. Indian Journal of Scientific Research (Spl.Ed. & NCWPCEB): 25-29.

Garg, N., Kumar, S., Yadav, K.K. and Kumar, C. 2015. Development of probiotic drink from cucumber using Lactobacillus sp. Indian. Journal of Horticulture, 72: 590-592.

Joshi, V.K. and Bhutani, V.P. 1995. ‘Peach and Nectrines’. In ‘Hand Book of Fruit Science and Technology: Production, Composition, Storage and Processing’, edited by D.K. Salunkhe and S.S. Kadam, Published by Marcel Dekkar Inc., New York, pp. 243-296.

Lee, G.D. 2015. Optimization of peach wine fermentation by response surface methodology. Journal of Korean Society for Food Science and Nutrition, 44: 586-591.

Ranganna, S. 2000. Handbook of Analysis and Quality Control for Fruit and Vegetable Products. IInd Ed. Tata Mc Graw Hill Publication Co. Ltd., New Delhi. 1112p.

Ravani, A. and Joshi, D.C. 2013. Mango and it’s by product utilization–a review. Trends in Post Harvest Technology, 1: 55-67.

Saleem, N., Kamran, M., Shaikh, S.A., Tarar, O.M. and Jamil, K. 2011. Studies on processing and preparation of peach squash. Pakistan Journal of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, 44: 12-17.

Journal of Eco-friendly Agriculture 16(1) 2021 85 doi: 10.5958/2582-2683.2021.00016.2

Development of value added products from subtropical peach

Sharma, K.D., Kaushal, M. and Kaushal, B.B.L. 2002. Canning of peach-halves in fruit juice. Journal of Scientific & Industrial Research, 61: 823-827.

Sortino, G., Gallotta, A., Farina, V. and Allegra, A. 2017. Shelf life and quality of fresh-cut peach cv. ‘Ruby Rich’ at different maturity stage. Chemical Engineering Transactions, 58: 409- 414. DOI: 10.33.3/CET1758069

Speck, M. 1985. Compendium of Methods for the Microbiological Examination of Foods. Second edition, American Public Health Association Inc. pp. 644-649.

Tandon, D.K., Yadav, R.C., Sood, S., Kumar, S. and Dikshit, A. 2004. Effect of lye peeling on nutritional quality of aonla candy. Indian Food Packer, 57: 147-152.

Yadav, P., Garg, N. and Kumar, S. 2017. Screening of mulberry accessions for wine preparation. International Journal of Food Fermentation Technology, 7: 103-109.

Published

2021-08-21

How to Cite

Garg, N., Kumar, S., Srivastava, K.K., Singh, B., & Vaish, S. (2021). Development of value added products from subtropical peach . Journal of Eco-Friendly Agriculture, 16(1), 83–86. https://doi.org/10.5958/2582-2683.2021.00016.2