Effect of post emergence application of herbicides, sole or in combination, on weed dynamics, growth and yield of pigeonpea under rainfed conditions

Authors

  • Asma Altaf Ansar Department of Agronomy, College of Agriculture, JNKVV, Jabalpur - 482 004
  • Anay K Rawat Department of Agronomy, College of Agriculture, JNKVV, Jabalpur - 482 004
  • Purnima Badole Department of Agronomy, College of Agriculture, JNKVV, Jabalpur - 482 004
  • Govardhan Lodha Department of Agronomy, College of Agriculture, JNKVV, Jabalpur - 482 004
  • Ashish Tiwari Department of Agronomy, College of Agriculture, JNKVV, Jabalpur - 482 004

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5958/2582-2683.2022.00054.5

Keywords:

Efficacy, pigeonpea, weed control, yield, economics, herbicide

Abstract

Field experiments carried out at JNKVV, Jabalpur during kharif season of 2014-15 and 2015-16 to evaluate the bio-efficacy of propaquizafop + imazethapyr ready mixture against weeds and their influence on yield and economics of pigeonpea, in randomized block design with three replications, revealed that post emergence application of propaquizafop alone at lowest doses (50 and 62.5 g ha–1) led to no marked effect against most of the weeds, but its efficacy improved when applied in combination with imazethapyr, being higher under propaquizafop + imazethapyr mixture applied at 62.5+ 75 g ha–1 or 100+100 g ha–1. Yield of pigeonpea was superior under propaquizafop + imazethapyr mixture applied at 100 + 100 g ha–1 followed by 62.5 + 75 g ha–1 which were comparable to hand weeding twice at 20 and 40 DAS. Highest benefit-cost ratio (BCR) was found under propaquizafop + imazethapyr mixture at 62.5+75 g ha–1 followed by propaquizafop + imazethapyr mixture (100+100 g ha–1), imazethapyr (100 g ha–1), propaquizafop (125 g ha–1), propaquizafop (100 g ha–1), Fenoxaprop-p-ethyl (100 g ha–1) propaquizafop (62.5 g ha– 1) and propaquizafop (50 g ha–1). Weed control efficiency (WCE), Weed index (WI), Weed management index (WMI) and Harvest index (HI) were highest under propaquizafop + imazethapyr mixture applied at 62.5+75 g ha–1 followed by propaquizafop + imazethapyr mixture applied at 100+100 g ha–1 and hand weeding twice at 20 and 40 DAS. 

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Anonymous. 2014. Directorate of Economics and Statistics. Department of Agriculture and Co-operation (4.14a & 98) Agricultural Statistics at A Glance, Government of India.

Billore, S.D., Joshi, O.P. and Ramesh, A. 2001. Energy productivity through herbicidal weed control in soybean

Devasenapathy, P., Ramesh, T. and Gangwar, B. 2008. Efficiency Indices for Agriculture Management Research. Sumit Pal Jain for New India Publishing Agency, New Delhi, India.

Dhonde, M.D., Kate, S.R., Pandure, B.S. and Tambe, A.D. 2009. Integrated weed management in pigeonpea. Indian Journal of Weed Science, 41: 102-105.

FAOSTAT, 2013. http://faostat.fao.org.

Gill, G.S. and Kumar, V. 1969. Weed index, a new method for reporting weed control trials. Indian Journal of Agronomy, 14: 96-98.

Gupta, V., Singh, M., Kumar, A., Sharma, B.C. and Kher, D. 2013. Influence of weed management practices on weed dynamics and yield of urdbean (Vignamungo) under rainfed conditions of Jammu. Indian Journal of Agronomy, 58: 220- 225.

Kandasamy, O.S. 1999. Effect of herbicides with and without manual weeding on weeds and yield of rainfed pigeonpea [Cajanuscajan (L.) Mill sp.]. Legume Research, 22: 172-176.

Kewat, M.L., Pandey, J., Yaduraju, N.T. and Kulshreshtha, G. 2000. Economic and ecofriendly weed management in soybean. Indian Journal Weed Science, 32: 135-139.

Mallareddy, M., Padmaja, B. and Jalapathirao, L. 2008. Response to rabi irrigation scheduling and weed management in Alfisols. Journal of Food Legumes, 21: 237-239.

Mani, V.S., Gautam, K.C. and Chakraborty, T. 1976. Losses in crop yields in India due to weed growth. PANS, 14: 142- 158.

Meena, D.S., Ram, B., Jadon, C. and Tetarwal, J.P. 2011. Efficacy of imazathapyr on weed management in soybean. Indian Journal of Weed Science, 43: 169-171.

Misra, M. and Misra, A. 1997. Estimation of IPM index in jute: a new approach. Indian Journal of Weed Science, 29: 39-42. Misra, O.R., Gautam, V.S., Dinesh, E., Rajpur, A.M. and Patidar, G.L. 2001. Integrated weed management and its economics in soybean. Crop Research, 2: 115-119.

Panse, V.G. and Sukhatme, P.V. 1967. Statistical methods for Agricultural Workers, ICAR, Publication, New Delhi. Shete, B.T., Dhage, V.J., Patil, J.B. and Barve, U.V. 2009. Effect of integrated weed management in pearl millet-pigeonpea intercropping. Annals of Plant Physiology, 23: 66-68. Suria, A.S.M.J., Juraimi, A.S., Rahman, M.M., Man, A.B. and Selamat, A. 2011. Efficacy and economics of different herbicides in aerobic rice system. African Journal of Biotechnology, 10: 8007-8022.

Tiwari, B.K. and Mathew, R. 2002. Influence of post emergence herbicides on growth and yield of soybean. JNKVV Research Journal, 36: 17-21.

Vivek, S.S., Tomern, S.G. and Tripathi, S.S. 2003. Crop weed competition in arhar (Cajanuscajan) under northern west plain zone. Indian Journal Weed Science, 35: 217-220.

Published

2022-12-24

How to Cite

Altaf Ansar, A., Rawat, A.K., Badole, P., Lodha, G., & Tiwari , A. (2022). Effect of post emergence application of herbicides, sole or in combination, on weed dynamics, growth and yield of pigeonpea under rainfed conditions . Journal of Eco-Friendly Agriculture, 17(2), 280–284. https://doi.org/10.5958/2582-2683.2022.00054.5