An eco-friendly approach of managing pod fly, Melanagromyza obtusa in pigeonpea

Authors

  • SALEEMALI KANNIHALLI Department of Agricultural Entomology, University of Agricultural Sciences, Raichur- 584 104, Karnataka, India.
  • V RACHAPPA Department of Agricultural Entomology, University of Agricultural Sciences, Raichur- 584 104, Karnataka, India.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.48165/

Keywords:

Melanagromyza obtusa, pigeonpea, sowing dates, varieties

Abstract

A field experiment was conducted during Kharif 2019-20 at ZARS, Kalaburagi, University of Agricultural Sciences, Raichur to study the influence of three sowing dates (20th July, 5th August and 20th August and three varieties viz., TS 3R (mid early duration), GRG 811 (medium duration) and BSMR 736 (long duration) on the incidence of pod fly, Melanagromyza obtusa in pigeonpea. Results revealed that, sowing on 20th July resulted in the lowest pod damage (29.33 %) and seed damage (20.77 %), followed by 5th August, while 20th August sown pigeonpea showed significantly higher damages. Among varieties, TS 3R exhibited the least pod damage (28.80 %) and seed damage (21.47 %), contrasting with BSMR 736, a long-duration variety with higher damages (41.87 % pod damage, 34.51 % seed damage). The findings emphasize that advancing sowing dates and selecting early-maturing varieties like can effectively decrease the infestation due pod fly.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Anonymous, 2017. Package of practices, University of Agricultural Sciences, Raichur.

Bhadani, D. J. and Patel, J. J. 2019. Seasonal incidence of pod fly, Melanagromyza obtusa infesting pigeonpea. International Journal of Pure & Applied Bioscience, 7(2): 44-50.

Cumming, G. and Jenkins, L. 2011. Chickpea: Effective crop establishment, sowing window, row spacing, seeding depth and rate. Northern Pulse Bulletin, 7: 6.

Dialoke, S. A., Ngwuta, A. A., Kabuo, N. O., Ofor, M. O. and Tom, C. T. 2014. Effect of time of planting on major insect pests and yield performance of three short duration pigeonpea (Cajanus cajan Millsp.) cultivars in Nsukka agro-ecological zone, Nigeria. Journal of SAT Agricultural Research, 12: 1-6.

Dobhal, P., Maurya, R. P., Bhatnagar, V. R. and Brijwal, L. 2018. Effect of different dates of sowing on dynamics of insect pests of pigeonpea in Tarai region of Uttarakhand. Journal of Entomology and Zoology Studies, 6(6): 513-518.

Dodia, D. A. 1992. Control of pests of pigeonpea with special reference to host plant resistance. Ph. D. Thesis, Anand Agricultural University, Anand, Gujrat (india).

Durairaj, C. 2006. Evaluation of certain neem formulations and insecticides against pigeonpea pod fly. Indian Journal of Pulses Research, 19(2): 269-270.

Ghetiya, L. V. 2010. Population dynamics and management of pod borer complex in pigeonpea, Cajanus cajan (L.) Millsp. Ph. D. Thesis, Anand Agricultural University, Anand, Gujrat (india).

Gogi, R. 2003. Bio ecology, crop loss estimation and management of pigeonpea pod fly, M. obtusa (Malloch) (Diptera: Agromyzidae). M. Sc. (Agri.) Thesis, University of Agriccultural Sciences, Dharwad (India).

Kabaria, B. B., Goyal, S. N., Jose, V. T. and Shah, A. H. 1993. Effect of sowing time in relation to different varieties on major insect pests and grain yield of pigeonpea in Gujarat. Indian Journal of Entomology, 55(1): 52-57.

Khan, M., Srivastava, C. P. and Sitanshu. 2014. Screening of some promising pigeonpea genotypes against major pests. Ecoscan, 6: 313-316.

Lal, C., Sharma, S. K. and Chahota, R. K. 1992. Oviposition response of pod fly (Melanagromyza obtusa) on resistant pigeonpea (Cajanus cajan) selections. Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 64: 658-660.

Lal, S. S. and Katti, G. 1997. Pod fly, Melanagromyza obtusa Malloch. A key pest of pigeonpea. Indian Institute of Pulse Research, IARI. p. 26.

Lal, S. S., Yadava, C. P. and Dias, C. A. R. 1981. Major pest problems of pigeonpea in Uttar Pradesh, India. International Pigeonpea Newsletter, 1: 30-31.

Lateef, S. S. and Reed, W. 1981. Development of methodology for open field screening for insect pest resistance in pigeonpea. In: Proceeding of International workshop on pigeonpea. 2: 315-322.

Nimse, N. B. and Jat, M. K. 2010. Effect of various sowing dates and varieties on incidence of pod borer in pigeonpea. Pestology, 34(7): 69-70.

Patel, H, P., Gurjar, R. and Patel, N, K., 2019, Impact of sowing periods on incidence of insect pest complex in pigeonpea. J. Entomol. Zool. Stud., 7(2): 1363-1370.

Patel, R. K., Mehta, A. N., Patel, D. R., Patel, J. J. and Patel, R. R. 2012. Impact of sowing period and varieties on incidence of pod borers and grain yield in pigeonpea. AGRES - An International e Journal, 1(3): 321-327.

Patra, S., Firake, D. M., Thakur, N. S. A. and Roy, A. 2016. Insect pest complex and crop losses in pigeonpea in medium altitude hill of Meghalaya. The Ecoscan, 11(1): 297-300.

Prasad, D., Bhan, C., Sharma, V. and Prasad, H. 2012. Effect of various plant geometry on chickpea (Cicer arietinum) under different dates of sowing: A Review. Journal of Progressive Agriculture, 3(2): 113-117.

Prasad, D., Chand, P. and Srivastava, G. P. 1986. Effect of sowing dates on the infestation of insect pests and grain yield of pigeonpea. Indian Journal of Entmology, 48(2): 230-231.

Shanower, T. G., Romeis, J. and Minja, E. M. 1999. Insect pests of pigeonpea and their management. Annual Review of Entomology, 44: 77-96.

Sharma, O. P., Gopali, J. B., Yelshetty, S., Bambawale, O. M., Garg, D. K. and Bhosle, B. B. 2010. Pests of pigeonpea and their management. NCIPM, IARI, New Delhi, India. p. 4.

Sunilkumar, N. M. 2015. Bio-ecology and management of pigeonpea pod fly, Melanagromyza obtusa Malloch (Diptera: Agromyzidae). Ph. D. Thesis, University of Agricultural Sciences, Raichur (India).

Upadhyay, R. K., Mukerji, K. G. and Rajak, R. L. 1998. IPM system in Agriculture, 4 pulses, New Delhi. P. 99.

Published

2024-07-02

How to Cite

SALEEMALI KANNIHALLI, & V RACHAPPA. (2024). An eco-friendly approach of managing pod fly, Melanagromyza obtusa in pigeonpea. Journal of Eco-Friendly Agriculture, 19(2), 411–416. https://doi.org/10.48165/