Comparative quality traits of Apis meliifera L. queens raised through standard queen rearing methods in the spring breeding season

Authors

  • Rajan Kamboj Department of Entomology, CCS Haryana Agricultural University, Hisar-125004, Haryana, India.
  • Surender K Sharma Bee Research Station, Nagrota Bagwan, CSK Himachal Pradesh Krishi Vishvavidyalaya, Palampur-136027, Himachal Pradesh, India.
  • Mandeep Rathee Krishi Vigyan Kendra, Kaithal, CCS Haryana Agricultural University, Hisar-125004, Haryana, India.
  • Naveen Rao Regional Research Station, Faridkot, PAU, Ludhiana-141027, Punjab, India.
  • Aslam Khan Department of Entomology, CCS Haryana Agricultural University, Hisar-125004, Haryana, India.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.48165/jefa.2024.19.01.17

Keywords:

Honey bee, Apis mellifera, queen rearing, Doolittle method, Miller method, Smith method, Swarming instinct

Abstract

The present investigation was undertaken to assess the quality traits of Apis meliifera L. queens raised through standard queen rearing methods namely Doolittle, Miller, Smith and Swarming instinct during the spring breeding season 2016-17 at the Experimental Apiary located at Bee Research Station, Nagrota Bagwan, CSK HPKV, Himachal Pradesh. A fixed number (n = 24) and age (d” 24 hours) of either larvae (Doolittle) or eggs (Miller and Smith) were used to rear the queen cells. The significantly highest acceptance was recorded for Doolittle method (13.50 ± 1.44; 56.25%) followed by Miller method (11.25 ± 1.31; 46.88%), while the acceptance was least for the Smith method (10.25 ± 1.31; 42.71%). The maximum number of sealed queen cells colony-1 (9.00 ± 1.22) and neonate queens colony-1 (6.00 ± 0.91) were also witnessed in the Doolittle method followed by the Miller method (8.00 ± 1.08 sealed queen cells colony-1; 4.25 ± 0.85 queens colony-1) and Smith method (7.75 ± 0.85 queen cells colony-1; 2.75 ± 0.62 queens colony-1). The Doolittle method also produced the largest queen cells (25.86 ± 0.89 × 12.11 ± 0.23 mm) followed by the Miller method (25.00 ± 0.33 × 11.93 ± 0.44 mm), whereas the smallest queen cells (21.12 ± 0.24 × 10.23 ± 0.75 mm) were witnessed in the colonies with Swarming instinct. The newly emerged queens from Doolittle, Miller, Swarming instinct and Smith methods had the mean body weights of 201.75 ± 10.06, 191.00 ± 8.82, 186.75 ± 6.54 and 184.00 ± 7.73 mg, respectively. The queens raised using the Doolittle method, initiated egg laying 3-4 days earlier (18.75 ± 0.48 days) compared to other methods (22.00 ± 0.41 days in Miller; 22.25 ± 0.48 days in Smith and 22.50 ± 0.87 days in Swarming instinct method). Overall, the Doolittle method produced the highest quality queens and Miller method was the next best. The Doolittle method could be used for mass rearing of high-quality queens on a commercial scale. 

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Adgaba, N., Al-Ghamdi, A., Tadesse, Y., Alsarhan, R., Single, A., Mohammed, S.E. and Khan, K.A. 2019. The responses of Apis mellifera jemenitica to different artificial queen rearing techniques. Saudi Journal of Biological Science, 26: 1649-1654.

Ahmad, S.B. and Dar, S.A. 2013. Mass rearing of queen bees Apis mellifera L. (Hymenoptera: Apidae) for bee colony development raised under the temperate conditions of Kashmir. Bioscan, 8: 945-948.

Amiri, E., Strand, M.K., Ruepell, O. and Tarpy, D.R. 2017. Queen quality and the impact of honey bee diseases on queen health: Potential for interactions between two major threats to colony health. Insects, 8: 48.

Arun, B.C. 2011. Studies on the factor influencing the mass production of Apis mellifera L. queens. M.Sc. Thesis submitted to University of Agriculture Sciences, Bangalore, Karnataka, India.

Atwal, A.S. and Goyal, N.P. 1973. Introduction of Apis mellifera in Punjab plains. Indian Bee Journal, 35: 1-9.

Atwal, A.S. and Sharma, O.P. 1968. The introduction of Apis mellifera queens into Apis cerana indica colonies and the associated behaviours of the two species. Indian Bee Journal, 30: 41-56.

Buchler, R., Andonov, S., Bienefeld, K., Costa, C., Hatjina, F., Kezic, N., Kryger, P., Spivak, M., Uzunov, A. and Wilde, J. 2013. Standard methods for rearing and selection of Apis mellifera queens. Journal of Apic Research, 52: 1-30.

Cengiz, M., Emsen, B. and Dodologlu, A. 2009. Some characteristics of queen bees (Apis mellifera L.) rearing in queenright and queenless colonies. Journal of Animal Vet Advance, 8: 1083-1085.

Cengiz, M.M., Yazici, K. and Arslan, S. 2019. The effect of the supplemental feeding of queen rearing colonies on the reproductive characteristics of queen bees (Apis mellifera L.) reared from egg and different old of larvae. Caucasian University Journal of Veternity, 25: 849-855.

Chaudhary, O.P. 2014. Constraint analysis in beekeeping industry. In: Proceedings of the Workshop on Promotion of Honey bee keeping in Haryana, Panchkula, Haryana, India, pp. 45-55.

Chaudhary, O.P. and Chand, R. 2017. Economic benefits of animal pollination to Indian agriculture. Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 87: 1117-1138.

Chhuneja, P.K. 2015. Traditional and commercial methods of mass queen bee rearing. In: Training course manual. Scientific Beekeeping and Integrated Pest Management, CCS Haryana Agricultural University, Hisar, Haryana, India, pp. 156.

Collins, A.M. and Pettis, J.S. 2013. Correlation of queen size and spermathecal contents and effects of miticide exposure during development. Apidologie, 44: 351-356.

Dhaliwal, N.K., Singh, J. and Chhuneja, P.K. 2017. Comparative evaluation of Doolittle, Cupkit and Karl Jenter techniques for rearing Apis mellifera Linnaeus queen bees during breeding season. Journal of Applied Natural Science, 9: 1658- 1661.

Dhaliwal, N.K., Singh, J. and Chhuneja, P.K. 2019. Comparative evaluation of mass queen bee rearing techniques for Apis mellifera (Hymenoptera: Apidae) in autumn season. Journal of Entomology and Zoology, 7: 1062-1065.

Dodologlu, A., Emsen, B. and Gene, F. 2004. Comparison of some characteristics of queen honey bees (Apis mellifera L.) reared by using doolittle method and natural queen cells. Journal of Applied Animal Research, 26: 113-115.

Doolittle, G.M. 1915. Scientific queen rearing: as practically applied. An American Bee Journal Publication, Hamilton, USA, pp. 126.

Emsen, B., Dodologlu, A., Genc, F., Smith, B.H. and Cobey, S. 2003. Effect of larvae age and grafting method on the larvae accepted rate and height of sealed queen cell (Apis mellifera L.). Journal of Applied Animal Research, 24: 201-206.

Gallai, N., Salles, J.M., Settele, J. and Vaissiere, B.E. 2009. Economic valuation of the vulnerability of world agriculture confronted with pollinator decline. Ecol Econ, 68: 810-821.

Gatoria, R.S., Chhuneja, P.K., Singh, J. and Singh, B. 2004. Mass queen bee rearing in Apis mellifera L. Indian Bee Journal, 66: 41-50.

Gatoria, G.S., Singh, B. and Singh, L. 2000. Effect of diameter of queen cell cups on mass rearing of Apis mellifera L. queen bees. Indian Bee Journal, 62: 59-61.

Gencer, H.V., Shah, S.Q. and Firatli, C. 2000. Effects of supplemental feeding of queen rearing colonies and larval age on the acceptance of grafted larvae and queen traits. PJBS, Pakistan, 3: 1319-1322.

Gregorc, A. and Skerl, S. 2015. Characteristics of honey bee (Apis mellifera carnica Pollman 1879) queens reared in Slovenian commercial breeding stations. Journal of Apic Science, 59: 5- 12.

Hoopingarner, R. and Farrar, C. 1959. Genetic control of size in queen honey bees. Journal of Econ. Entomology, 52: 547-548.

Kahya, Y., Gencer, H.V. and Woyke, J. 2008. Weight at emergence of honey bee (Apis mellifera caucasica) queens and its effect on live weights at the pre and post mating periods. Journal of Apic Research, 47: 118-125.

Koeniger, G. 1986. Reproduction and mating behavior. In: Bee Genetics and Breeding. (Rinderer T.E. ed), Academic Press, Cambridge, USA. p. 426.

Koeniger, G., Koeniger, N., Ellis, J. and Connor, L.H. 2014. Mating Biology of Honey Bees (Apis mellifera), In: Wicwas Press, Kalamazoo, Michigan, USA. pp. 155.

Kumar, J. and Mall, P. 2016. Effect of life stages and colony on live weight of newly emerged queen Apis mellifera ligustica. Journal of Experimental Zoology, 19: 1379-1383.

Kumar, N., Chand, S. and Singh, R. 2000. Effects of size of queen cup cells on queen production in Apis mellifera and Apis cerana indica. Indian Bee Journal, 62: 63-65.

Kumar, R. and Kundal, N. 2016. Beekeeping status in Kangra district of Himachal Pradesh. Journal of Entomological Zoology, 4: 620-622.

Laidlaw, H.H. and Eckert, J.E. 1962. Queen rearing. University of California Press, Berkeley, USA.

Laidlaw, H.H. and Page, R.E. 1997. Queen rearing and bee breeding. Wicwas Press, New York, USA, pp. 224.

Martin, S.J. and Medina, L.M. 2004. Africanized honey bees have unique tolerance to Varroa mites. Trends Parasitology, 20: 112-114.

McKinley, W.M. 1963. Grafting-how it is done. Gleanings in Bee Culture, 91: 404-409.

Miller, C.C. 1911. Fifty years among the bees. An A.I. Root Company Publication, Medina, Ohio, USA.

National Bee Board. 2023. State-wise details of the beekeepers registered with the Board up to March, 2023. https:// madhukranti.in/nbb/frm_appl_report_all.aspx?id=1 [Accessed on 2 April, 2023].

Neov, B., Georgiev, A., Shumkova, R., Radoslavov, G. and Hristov, P. 2019. Biotic and abiotic factors associated with colonies mortalities of managed honey bee (Apis mellifera). Diversity 11, 237, https://doi.org/10.3390/d11120237.

Njeru, L.K., Raina, S.K., Kutima, H.L., Salifu, D., Cham, D.T., Kimani, J.M. and Mili, E.M. 2017. Effect of larval age and supplemental feeding on morphometrics and oviposition in honey bee Apis mellifera scutellat queens. Journal of Apic Research, 56: 1-7.

Okuyan, S. and Akyol, E. 2018. The effects of age and number of grafted larvae on some physical characteristics of queen bees and acceptance rate of queen bee cell. TURJAF, 6: 1556- 1561.

Oldroyd, B.P., Goodman, R.D. and Allaway, M.A. 1990. On the relative importance of queens and workers to honey production. Apidologie, 21: 153-159.

Phiri, B.J., Fevre, D. and Hidano, A. 2022. Uptrend in global managed honey bee colonies and production based on a six decade viewpoint, 1961-2017. Science Reporter, 12: 21298, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-25290-3.

Rathee, M., Chaudhary, O.P. and Dalal, P.K. 2021b. Advertising the significance of diverse plant taxa to Apis mellifera L. foragers during dearth period. In: National Web Symposium on Recent Advances in Beneficial Insects: Natural Resins and Gums, organized by ICAR-IINRG, Ranchi, India, pp. 86.

Rathee, M., Chaudhary, O.P., Yadav, S. and Dalal, P.K. 2021a. Estimating the influx of pollen into A. mellifera L. hives using Chaudhary’s pollen trap during dearth period at Kaithal (Haryana). In: Proceedings of Virtual National Conference on Strategic Reorientation for Climate Smart Agriculture (Vol. III), PAU, Ludhiana, India, pp. 335.

Ruttner, F. 1988. Biogeography and taxonomy of honeybees. Springer Verlag, Berlin, Germany, pp. 284.

Sharma, A., Rana, K., Sharma, H.K. and Sharma, A. 2020. Evaluation of priming media and queen cup material on larval graft acceptance and queen emergence in Apis mellifera L. Journal of Entomological Zoology, 8: 1089-1097.

Smith, J. 1923. Queen rearing simplified. An A.I. Root Company Publication, Medina, Ohio, USA. pp. 119.

Tarpy, D.R., Hatch, S. and Fletcher, D.C. 2000. The influence of queen age and quality during queen replacement in honey bee colonies. Animal Behaviour, 59: 97-101.

Thakur, R.K., Dogra, G.S. and Gupta, J.K. 1998. Investigation on factors influencing queen rearing success in honeybees Apis mellifera L. Pest Management and Economic Zoology, 6: 61-63.

Vaziritabar, S. and Esmaeilzade, S.M. 2018. Preliminary attempts to rear larvae of the Iranian honeybee (Apis mellifera meda) colony and effect of different factors on graft acceptance in honeybee colonies in Karaj apiary. Journal of Entomological Zoology, 6: 683-692.

Wakjira, K., Negera, T., Dabela, S. and Alemu, T. 2019. Comparing responses of local honeybees (Apis mellifera L.) to Karl Jenter and Doolittle grafting queen rearing methods. International Journal of Animal Science and Technology, 3: 35-40.

Winston, M.L. 1987. The biology of the honey bee. Harvard University Press, Cambridge. pp. 180.

Woyke, J. and Ruttner, F. 1958. An anatomical study of the mating process in the honey bee. Bee World, 39: 3-18.

Woyke, J., Jasinski, Z., Prabucki, J., Wilde, J., Chuda-Mickiewicz, B., Siuda, M., Madras-Majewska, B., Samborski, J., Bratkowski, J. and Jojczyk, A. 2008. Onset of oviposition by honey bee queens, mated either naturally or by various instrumental insemination methods, fits a lognormal distribution. Journal Apic Research, 47: 1-9.

Zhao, X. and Liu, Y. 2022. Current knowledge on bee innate immunity based on genomics and transcriptomics. International Journal of Molecular Science, 23: 14278, https:// doi.org/10.3390/ ijms232214278.

Zmarlicki, C. and Morse, R.A. 1963. Drone congregation areas. Journal of Apic Research, 2: 64-66.

Downloads

Published

2024-01-19

Issue

Vol. 19 No. 1 (2024): Journal of Eco-Friendly Agriculture (Jan-Jun)2024

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Kamboj, R., Sharma, S.K., Rathee, M., Rao, N., & Khan, A. (2024). Comparative quality traits of Apis meliifera L. queens raised through standard queen rearing methods in the spring breeding season. Journal of Eco-Friendly Agriculture, 19(1), 95–103. https://doi.org/10.48165/jefa.2024.19.01.17
Crossref
Scopus
Google Scholar
Europe PMC