Genetic components for germination indices, root architecture and their correlation with field emergence of cowpea varieties

Authors

  • Shambhoo Prasad Shambhoo Associate Professor, Department of Agriculture Shivalik Institute of Professional Studies, Dehradun, Uttarakhand, India

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.48165/jefa.2024.19.02.15

Keywords:

Germination indices, root architecture, genetic components , correlation, cowpea

Abstract

 

The experiment carried out to estimate genetic components for germination indices and root architecture of twenty eight cowpea seed lots for predicting field emergence during rainy seasons, showed that the phenotypic coefficient of variation varied from 74.54 to 97.63 per cent across the traits. More than 90 per cent genotypic coefficient of variation was estimated for normal seedlings per cent and root architecture traits and germination indices had between 68.35 to 75.09 per cent GCV. Heritability ranged from 79.41 to 93.45 per cent across the traits. Moderate genetic gain was recorded in normal seedling per cent and root architecture and germination indices had lower genetic gain. However germination indices and root architecture positively correlated with each other. Among germination indices, normal seedlings, mean daily germination and germination index had significant positive association with field emergence (0.648**, 0.624**, 0.569**) and among root architecture, shoot length showed significant association with field emergence (0.569**). Therefore, early vigour may be used as one of the selection criterion in breeding programme for developing new ideal variety that could perform better under adverse environmental conditions. 

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Allard, R. W. 1960. Principle of plant breeding. J.Wiley and Sons Inc., New York: 485.

Association Official Seed Analyst. Rules for testing seeds. J. Seed Technol. 1981; 6(2):126 .

Basunanda, P., Radoev, M., Ecke, W., Friedt, W., Becker, H. C. and Snowdon, R. J. 2010. Comparative mapping of quantitative trait loci involved in heterosis for seedling and yield traits in oilseed rape. Theoret. Appl. Genet. 120: 271-281.

Burton, W. G. and De-Vane, E. W. 1953. Estimating heritability in tall fescue from replicated clonal material. Proejtunniens. 9(22): 12-15.

Condon, A. G., Richards, R. A., Rebetzke, G. J. and Farquhar, G. D. 2004. Breeding for higher water use efficiency. J. Exp. Bot. 55: 2447-2460.

Danikou, S., Shango, A. J. and Sigalla, J. P. 2022. Variation of Seed Traits and Initial Quality among Selected Cowpea, Mungbean, and Soybean Accessions. Seeds. 1(4): 303-314.

Delouche JC, Baskin CC. Accelerated aging techniques for predicting the relative storability of seed los. Seed Sci. Technol. 1973;1: 427-452.

Egli, D. B. and TeKrony, D. M. 1995. Soybean seed germination, vigour and field emergence. Seed Sci. Technol. 23: 595-607.

Eshraghi-Nejad M, Kamakr B, Soltani A. Cardinal temperatures and required biological days for sowing to emergence of three millet species . J. Agril. Sci. Technol. 2009; 3: 36-43.

Gerrano, A.S., Jansen van Rensburg, W. S. and Patrick O Adebola. 2017. Preliminary evaluation of seed and germination traits in cowpea (Vigna unguiculata) genotypes. South Afr. J. Pl. Soil. 34(5): 399-402.

Gomez, K. A. and Gomez, A. A. 1983. Statistical Procedures for Agricultural Research. J. Wiley and Sons Inc., New York. 357-427 pp.

Hampton, J. G. and TeKrony, D. M. 1995. Handbook of vigour test methods. Int. Seed Testing Assoc. Zurich, Switzerland. 117p.

ISTA, 2010. International rules for seed testing. ISTA, Switzerland, 310 p.

Johnson, H. W., Robinson, H. F. and Comstock, R. E. 1955. Estimates of genetic and environmental variability in soybean. Agron. J.47: 314-318.

Kamara1, E. G., Saidu D., Mansaray, Kabbia, M. K., Moseray, M. T. and Jabbie, J. M. 2019. Evaluation of morphometric and physiological seed quality traits of improved cowpea (Vigna unguiculata L. Walp) varieties in Sierra Leone. J. Stor. Produ. Postha. Res. 10(5): 35-42.

Kim, S. H., Choe, Z. R., Kang, J. H., Copeland, L. O. and Elias, S. G. 1994. Multiple seed vigour indices to predict field emergence and performance of barley. Seed Sci. Technol. 22: 59-68.

Makkawi, M., El-Balla, M., Bishaw, Z. and Van-Gastel, A. J. G. 1999. The relationship between seed vigour tests and field emergence in lentil. Seed Sci. Technol. 27: 657-668.

Moridani, M. E., Nejad, M. E. and Far, F. G. 2011. The appropriate laboratory tests for predicting field emergence and performance of chickpea. Seed Sci. Biotech. 5(1): 21-24.

Morrison, G. D. and Linder, C. R. 2014. Association mapping of germination traits in Arabidopsis thaliana light and nutrient treatments: searching for G x E effects. Genes, Geno. Genet. 4: 1465-1478.

Pal, S., Sharma, H., Rai, A. K. and Bhardwaj, R. K. 2016. Genetic variability, heritability and genetic gain for yield and quality traits in cucumber. The Bioscan. 11(3): 1985-1990.

Qi, Z., Song, J., Zhang, K., Liu, S., Tian, X., Wang, Y., Fang, Y., Li, X., Wang, J. and Yang, C.2020. Identification of QTNs Controlling 100-Seed Weight in Soybean Using Multilocus Genome-Wide Association Studies. Front. Genet. 11, 689.

Richards, R. A., Rebetzke, G. J., Condon, A. G. and Herwaarden, A. F. 2002. Breeding opportunities for increasing the efficiency of water use and crop yield in temperate cereals creasing the efficiency in temperate cereals. Crop Sci. 42: 111-121.

Robinson HF. Quantitative genetics in relation to breeding on central of mendalism. Indian J. Genet. 1966; 26(A): 171-187.

Shukla, P. S., Prasad, R. and Prasad, S. 2010. Study on genetic and seed quality parameters in horsegram genotypes under mid hills of North Western Himalaya. Trends Biosci. 3(2): 187-189.

Wang YR, Yu L, Nan ZB. Use of seed givour tests to predict field emergence of Lucerne (Medicago sativa L.). New Zealand J. Agril. Res. 1996; 39: 255-262.

Published

2024-07-02

How to Cite

Shambhoo, S.P. (2024). Genetic components for germination indices, root architecture and their correlation with field emergence of cowpea varieties. Journal of Eco-Friendly Agriculture, 19(2), 324–328. https://doi.org/10.48165/jefa.2024.19.02.15