CHATBOT FOR EDUCATIONAL SERVICES:CONFIRMATION AND ASSESSMENT OF QUALITY DIMENSIONS

Authors

  • Garima Gupta Principal Investigator, Professor, Faculty of Management Studies, University of Delhi, Delhi Author
  • Sonika Nagpal Co-PI, Assistant Professor (Adhoc), Department of Commerce, P.G.D.A.V (Eve) College, University of Delhi, Delhi Author

Keywords:

Chatbot, Quality Dimensions, User Experience, Educational Services

Abstract

The increased use of digital devices and  integration of information technology has  resulted in a rise in the development and  implementation of artificial intelligence-based  bots. Education sector is no exception and is  actively exploiting the capabilities of chatbots  for teaching and learning. Delhi University too  took a leap forward in this regard by enabling  its admission chatbot in the current academic  session. Since research in this domain is still in  its infancy, the present study was undertaken to  provide an understanding of the chatbot quality  and effectiveness for academic institutions.  Responses obtained from 226 students who had  used the admission chatbot were analyzed using  the technique of CFA and SEM. The results  confirm 13 dimensions of chatbot quality for  educational services. Further, the performance  of the admission chatbot is found to be above  average for all the dimensions, indicating the  scope as well as need for improvement in its  quality and effectiveness, especially with respect  to the dimensions of Personalization, Security,  and Information Quality which have been  revealed to be exerting a significant impact on  the overall experience of the users (i.e., students).  The findings thus help in identifying important  constituents of chatbot quality and may be used  by higher education institutions and Universities  to develop and integrate chatbots in teaching  and learning activities to yield desired experience  for students across different disciplines and  courses. 

References

Bitner, M., Faranda, W., Hubbert, A & Zeithaml, V. (1997). Customer contributions and roles in service delivery. International Journal of Service Industry Management. 8. 193-205. 10.1108/09564239710185398.

Curran, J. M., & Meuter, M. L. (2005). Self-service technology adoption: Comparing three technologies.

Journal of Services Marketing, 19(2), 103–113. https://doi.org/ 10.1108/08876040510591411

Djelassi, S., Diallo, M.F. & Zielke, S. (2018). How self-service technology experience evaluation affects waiting time and customer satisfaction? A moderated mediation model. Decision Support Systems, 111, 38-47. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dss.2018.04.004.

Guesmia S.E., Tomiuk, D. & Marcotte, S. (2018). Developing a measure of quality for web-based Chatbots- Preliminary Results. Proceedings of the 2018 (8th) International Conference, Concordia University, Montreal, Canada. 34-51.

Iqbal, M.S., Hassan, M.U. & Habibah, U. (2018). Impact of self-service technology (SST) service quality on customer loyalty and behavioral intention: The mediating role of customer satisfaction. Congent Business & Management, 5, 1. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311975.2018.1423770 6. Li, L., Lee, K. Y., Emokpae, E., & Yang, S. B. (2020). What makes you continuously use chatbot services? Evidence from Chinese online travel agencies. Electronic Markets, 31(3), 575-599. https://doi. org/10.1007/s12525-020-00454-z

Meyer-Waarden, L. Pavone, G. Poocharoentou, T., Prayatsup, P., Ratinaud, M., Tison, A & Torne, S. (2020). How service quality influences customer acceptance and usage of Chatbots? Journal of Service Management Research, 4 (1), 35-51.

Nguyen, X.H., Tran, H.L., Phan, H.A., & Phan, T.D. (2019). Factors influencing customer satisfaction: The case of Facebook Chabot Vietnam. International Journal of Data and Network Science, 4, 167-178. 9. Noor, N., Rao Hill, S., & Troshani, I. (2021). Recasting service quality for AI-based service. Australasian Marketing Journal. doi: 10.1177/18393349211005056

Parasuraman, A., Zeithaml, V. A., & Berry, L. L. (1988). SERVQUAL: A multiple-item scale for measuring consumer perceptions of service quality. Journal of Retailing, 64(1), 12. 11. Parasuraman, A., Zeithaml, V.A., & Malhotra, A. (2005). E-S-QUAL: A multiple-item scale for assessing electronic service quality. Journal of Service Research,7(3), 213-233. doi:10.1177/109467050427115 12. Radziwill, N.M., & Benton, M.C. (2017). Evaluating quality of Chatbots and intelligent conversational agents. ArXiv, abs/1704.04579.

Rust, R.T. and Oliver, R.L. (1994). Service quality: Insights and managerial implications from the frontier. In: Rust, R.T. and Oliver, R.L., Eds., Service Quality: New Directions in Theory and Practice, Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, 1-19.http://dx.doi.org/10.4135/9781452229102.n1 14. The Economic Times, E-Paper, August 1, 2021. https://economictimes.indiatimes.com/industry/services/ education/delhi-university-to-start-registration-process-for-ug-courses-from monday/articleshow/84946729. cms?utm_source=contentofinterest&utm_medium=text&utm_campaign=cppst 15. Van de Sand, F., Frison, A. K., Zotz, P., Riener, A. & Holl, K. User Experience Is Brand Experience. Springer, 2020, https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:spr:mgmtpr:978-3-030-29868-5. DOI: 10.1007/978- 3-030-29868-5

Published

2024-07-11

How to Cite

CHATBOT FOR EDUCATIONAL SERVICES:CONFIRMATION AND ASSESSMENT OF QUALITY DIMENSIONS . (2024). IITM JOURNAL OF BUSINESS STUDIES (JBS), 8(1), 41–49. Retrieved from https://acspublisher.com/journals/index.php/jbs/article/view/16727