Impact Assessment of Ration Balancing on Productive Performance and Economics of Milk Production in Field Conditions
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.48165/ijvsbt.19.3.10Keywords:
Feed cost, Milk yield, Propensity score matching, Ration balancingAbstract
A field survey was conducted to assess the ration balancing programme undertaken by ICAR-NDRI on the extent of productivity increase and cost reduction on the adoption of balanced animal ration. Four villages were selected, out of which, two villages received services such as the provision of the mineral mixture from ICAR-NDRI and ration balancing programme under NDP-I was also implemented in these two villages (Treatment villages – Lalukheri and Alipur) and the other two villages didn’t receive any kind of services from the ICAR-NDRI (Control villages – Dhansaini and Bhoura-Khurd). From each village, about 50 dairy farmers were randomly selected. Data were collected on feeding management practices using a pre-tested interview schedule. The collected data was analyzed using propensity score matching to control bias due to confounding variables. Results revealed that more cattle and buffaloes were fed on a balanced ration in treatment villages as compared to control villages. Attributed to ration balancing the average daily milk yield of Murrah, HF and Jersey crossbreds was significantly increased by 25.7%, 18.8% and 37% (unmatched) respectively, and the quantum of increase after controlling for the confounding factors by calculation of average treatment on the treated resulted in an 8.8%, 9.3% and 13.4% increase in case of Murrah, HF and Jersey crossbreds, respectively. Fat% and SNF% were improved significantly (P < 0.01) only in Murrah buffaloes fed with balanced ration. Total feeding cost didn’t vary between RBP and non-RBP animals after the calculation of ATT. However, the cost of feed per kg of milk of the RBP animals was found to be around 15% significantly (P < 0.01) lower than the non-RBP animals. The total returns, net returns from milk production as well as the milk-feed ratio of RBP animals were significantly higher.
Downloads
References
Ali, J. 2007. Livestock Sector Development and Implications for Rural Poverty Alleviation in India. Livestock Research for Rural Development, 19(2): 1-14.
Dash, S. 2017. Contribution of livestock sector to Indian economy. Indian Journal of Research, 6(1): 890-891.
Deen, A., Tyagi, N., Yadav, R., Kumar, S., Tyagi, A. & Singh, S. 2019. Feeding balanced ration can improve the productivity and economics of milk production in dairy cattle: a comprehensive field study. Tropical Animal Health Production, 51(4): 737–744.
Department of Animal Husbandry and Dairying (DAH&D). 2021. Annual Report 2020-21. Available at: https://dahd.nic.in/annual-reports/dahd-annual-report-2020-21
Duncan, A. J., Teufel, N., Mekonnen, K., Singh, V. K., Bitew, A. & Gebremedhin, B. 2013. Dairy intensification in developing countries: effects of market quality on farm-level feeding and breeding practices. Animal, 7(12): 2054–2062.
Garg, M. R. & Bhanderi, B. M. 2011. Enhancing livestock productivity through balanced feeding. Livestock Productivity Enhancement with Available Feed Resources: 14th Biennial Conference of the Animal Nutrition Society of India. Pp 11-21. 3-5 November 2011. Pantnagar.
Garg, M. R., Bhandari, B. M. & Goswami, A. 2016. Impact of balanced feeding on the solids-not-fat (SNF) content of milk. Indian Journal of Dairy Science, 69(3).
Garg, M. R., Biradar, S. A. & Kannan, A. 2009. Assessment of economic impact of implementing ration balancing programme in lactating cows and buffaloes under field conditions. Indian Journal of Animal Nutrition, 26(2): 146–150.
Kannan, A., Garg, M. R. & Mahesh Kumar, B. V. 2011. Effect of ration balancing on milk production, microbial protein synthesis and methane emission in crossbred cows under field conditions in Chittoor district of Andhra Pradesh. Indian Journal of Animal Nutrition, 28: 117–132.
Mudgal, V., Mehta, M. K., Rane, A. S. & Nanavati, S. 2003. A survey on feeding practices and nutritional status of dairy animals in Madhya Pradesh. Indian Journal Animal Nutrition, 20 (2): 217–220.
Otte, J,, Costales, A., Dijkman, J., Pica-Ciamarra, U., Robinson, T., Ahuja, V., Ly, C. & Roland-Holst, D. 2012. Livestock sector development for poverty reduction: an economic and policy perspective. Livestock’s many virtues. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO).
Patil, R., Atkare, V., Zinjarde, R. & Gubbawar, S. 2014. Feeding and management practices adopted by milch buffalo owners under field condition of Ramtek tahsil. Journal of Soils and Crop, 24(1): 154-158.
Rathod, P., Hiremath, S., Manjunathachar, H., Balaraj, B. & Bangar, Y. 2014. Adoption status of livestock innovations and factors affecting their adoption in Bidar district of Karnataka. The Indian Journal of Veterinary Sciences and Biotechnology, 9(4): 62–65.
Rosenbaum, P. & Rubin, D. 1983. The central role of the propensity score in observational studies for causal effects. Biometrika, 70(1): 41–55.
Sherasia, P., Phondba, B., Hossain, S. & Garg, M. 2015. Impact of feeding balanced rations on milk production, methane emission, metabolites and feed conversion efficiency in lactating cows. Indian Journal of Animal Research, 50(4): 505–511.
Sirohi, S., Sridhar, V., Srivastav, A., Kalamkar, S., Sharma, D. & Boyal, V. 2017. Ration Balancing: Promising Option for Doubling Income from Dairying. Agricultural Economics Research Review, 30: 193-203
Vaghamashi, D. G., Murkute, V. D., Jangale, P. R. & Jotaniya, A. H. 2016. Impact of balanced feeding on milk production, milk fat and feeding cost in crossbred cows. International Journal of Science, Environment and Technology, 5(6): 3989–3992.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Indian Journal of Veterinary Sciences & Biotechnology
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.