Principal Component Analysis of Biometric Traits Explain the Body Weight of HF Crossbred Cattle

Authors

  • Ashwini J Patel Department of Animal Genetics and Breeding, College of Veterinary Science and Animal Husbandry, Anand-388001, Kamdhenu University, Gujarat, India
  • Dharmsi N Rank Department of Animal Genetics and Breeding, College of Veterinary Science and Animal Husbandry, Anand-388001, Kamdhenu University, Gujarat, India

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.48165/ijvsbt.19.2.07

Keywords:

Biometric traits, Body weight, Factor analysis, HF crossbred cattle, principal component analysis

Abstract

The present research was carried out to define the biometric traits of HF Crossbred Cattle from Livestock Research Station, AAU, Anand; Sarsa Heifer Farm - Amul Dairy, Anand; Ode Semen Station - Amul Dairy, Anand. The biometric traits recorded on 506 HF Crossbred Cattle and those are body length (BL), height at wither (HW), height at hip (HH), heart girth (HG), chest depth (CD) and width of hip (WH), live body weight (BW) and age. All the data were grouped sex-wise. Principal component analyses of biometric traits revealed that out of six components, two principal components were extracted in female and male group. The identified two components in female group could explain 95.88% of cumulative variance. First component accounted for 69.20 % of the variation. It was represented by significant positive high loading of BL (0.893), HW (0.911), HH (0.908), HG (0.879), CD (0.867) and WH (0.842). The second component explained 26.68 % of total variance with high loading of age (0.915). Out of two principal components, one (PC1) provided a means of reduction in the number of biometric traits to be recorded in HF crossbred female. In HF crossbred male group, the identified two components could explain 97.57% of cumulative variance. First component accounted for 60.58 % of the variation. It was represented by significant positive high loading of BL (0.836), HW (0.865), HH (0.901), HG (0.768), CD (0.804) and WH (0.737). The second component explained 36.99 % of total variance with high loading of age (0.888). First component seemed to be explaining the maximum of general body conformation in HF crossbred male. The result suggests that principal component analysis (PCA) could be used in breeding programs with a drastic reduction in the number of biometric traits to be recorded to explain body conformation and in selection of elite animals.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Fumio, M., Hideaki, N., & Toyokazu, F. (1982). Application of principal component analysis for defining size and shape in Japanese black cattle sires. The Science reports of Faculty of Agriculture, Kobe University, 15, 169-176.

Hammock, S.P., & Shrode, R.P. (1986). Calfhood weights, body measurements and measures of fatness versus criteria of overall size and shape for predicting yearling performance in beef cattle. Journal of Animal Science, 63, 447-452.

Hotelling, H. (1933). The most predictable criterion. Journal of Education Psychology, 26, 139-142.

Johnson, R.A., & Wichern, D.W. (2007). Applied Multivariate Statistical Analysis. 6th ed., Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall

Kaiser, H.F. (1958). The varimax criterion for analytic rotation in factor analysis. Psychometrika, 23(3), 187-200.

Karacaroen, B., & Kadarmindeen, H.N. (2008). Principal component and clustering analysis of functional traits in Swiss dairy cattle. Turkish Journal of Veterinary & Animal Sciences, 32, 163-171.

Manly, B.F. (1994). 10 ecological statistics. Handbook of Statistics, 12, 307-376.

Pundir, R.K., Singh, P.K., Singh, K.P., & Dangi, P.S. (2011). Factor analysis of biometric traits of Kankrej cows to explain body conformation. Asian-Australasian Journal of Animal Sciences, 24(4), 449-456.

Sadek, M.H., Al-Aboud, & Ashmawy, A.A. (2006). Factor analysis of body measurements in Arabian horses. Journal of Animal Breeding and Genetics, 123, 369-377.

Salako, A.E. (2006). Principal component factor analysis of the morphostructure of immature Uda sheep. International Journal of Morphology, 24(4), 571-574.

Schwabe, A.E., & Hall, S.J.G. (1989). Dystociain nine British breeds of cattle and its relationship to the dimensions of the damand calf. Veterinary Record, 125, 636-639.

Simon, D. L., & Buchenauer, D. (1993). Genetic diversity of European livestock breeds. Wageningen Pers.

Yakubu, A., Ogah, D.M., & Idahor, K.O. (2009). Principal component analysis of the morphostructural indices of White Fulani cattle. Trakia Journal of Science, 7(2), 67-73.

Yakubu, A., Salako, A.E., Imumorin, I.G., Ige, A.O., & Kinyemi, M.O.A. (2010). Discriminate analysis of morphometric differentiation in the West African Dwarf and Red Sokoto goats. South African Journal of Animal Science, 40(4), 381-387.

Downloads

Published

2023-03-02

How to Cite

Patel, A.J., & Rank, D.N. (2023). Principal Component Analysis of Biometric Traits Explain the Body Weight of HF Crossbred Cattle. Indian Journal of Veterinary Sciences and Biotechnology, 19(2), 34–39. https://doi.org/10.48165/ijvsbt.19.2.07