Sensitivity of Campylobacter jejuni Virulence genes flaA,mapA and hipO by Polymerase chain reaction

Authors

  • Dhanalakshmi Marimuthu Department of Veterinary Public Health and Epidemiology, Veterinary College and Research Institute, Orathanadu, Thanjavur -614625, India
  • Muthu Sekar Department of Veterinary Public Health and Epidemiology, Madras Veterinary College, Vepery, Chennai – 600007, India
  • Gunasaleen L Department of Veterinary Public Health and Epidemiology, Madras Veterinary College, Vepery, Chennai – 600007, India
  • Bhanurekha Vivekanandan Department of Veterinary Public Health and Epidemiology, Rajiv Gandhi Institute of Veterinary Education and Research, Kurumbapet, Puducherry -605009, India
  • Balakrishnan Singaram Department of Veterinary Public Health and Epidemiology, Veterinary College and Research Institute, Orathanadu, Thanjavur -614625, India
  • Gopal Dhinakar Raj Department of Animal Biotechnology, Madras Veterinary College, Vepery , Chennai – 600007, India

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.48165/ijvsbt.18.5.22

Keywords:

C.jejuni, flaA, PCR, Analytical sensitivity

Abstract

Campylobacter jejuni is more frequently associated with zoonotic bacterial cause of foodborne gastroenteritis in humans. Effective diagnosis of C. jejuni infection in various matrix like foods of animal origin, environment  and human is crucial to maintain public health.  Since molecular diagnosis of C. jejuni carries several advantages over conventional microbial culture techniques, in this study, the limit of detection for the selected virulence genes of C. jejuni (flaA,mapA and hipO) were evaluated to know the suitability of them to be used as molecular diagnostic targets for early detection of C. jejuni by  in- house designed primers  by conventional PCR. Analytical sensitivity of these genes were assessed in terms of  Colony Forming Units (103 CFU/ ml, 102 CFU/ ml, 101 CFU/ ml, 100 CFU/ ml) and DNA concentration (100 ng,10 ng, 1 ng, 100 pg, 10 pg and 1 pg ) of C jejuni  cultures. Results revealed  that the primers targeting flaA have superior limit of detection as 10CFU  and 1pg of C. jejuni DNA. Whereas  mapA and  hipO have 10 CFU; 10 pg DNA and  100 CFU ;10 ng DNA detection limit respectively. Gene mapA  had comparable detection limits in terms of CFU with flaA but found to be less  sensitive  with respect to DNA concentration but hipO has 102 fold lesser limit of  detection.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Astorga, A.F., and Alonso, R. (2010). Campylobacter. In: Dong You Liu (Ed.), Molecular detection of foodborn pathogen. CRC Press. pp. 345 360.

Attia, S., Versloot, C. J., Voskuijl, W., van Vliet, S. J., Di Giovanni, V., Zhang, L., & Bandsma, R. H. (2016). Mortality in children with complicated severe acute malnutrition is related to intestinal and systemic inflammation: an observational cohort study. The American journal of clinical nutrition, 104(5), 1441-1449.

Baldvinsson, S. B., Sorensen, M. C., Vegge, C. S., Clokie, M. R., & Brondsted, L. (2014). Campylobacter jejuni motility is required for infection of the flagellotropic bacteriophage F341. Applied Environment Microbiology, 80, 7096–7106.

Bessede, E., Delcamp, A., Sifré, E., Buissonniere, A., & Mégraud, F. (2011). New methods for detection of campylobacters in stool samples in comparison to culture. Journal of clinical microbiology. 49(3), 941-944.

Datta, S., Niwa, H., & Itoh, K. (2003). Prevalence of 11 pathogenic genes of Campylobacter jejuni by PCR in strains isolated from humans, poultry meat and broiler and bovine faeces.. Journal of medical microbiology. 52: 345 348.

Giannatale, E., Calistri, P., Donato, G., Decastelli, L., Goffredo, E., Adriano, D., Mancini, E., et al., (2019). Thermotolerant Campylobacter spp. in chicken and bovine meat in Italy: Prevalence, level of contamination and molecular characterization of isolates. PLoS One. Dec 6;14(12):e0225957.

Kaakoush, N. O., Castaño-Rodríguez, N., Mitchell, H. M., & Man, S. M. (2015). Global epidemiology of Campylobacter infection. Clinical microbiology reviews, 28(3), 687-720.

Lin, J. (2009). Novel approaches for Campylobacter control in poultry. Foodborne pathogens and disease, 6(7), 755-765.

Linton, D., Owen, R. J., & Stanley, J. (1996). Rapid identification by PCR of the genus Campylobacter and of five Campylobacter species enteropathogenic for man and animals. Research in microbiology, 147(9), 707-718.

Persson, S., & Olsen, K. E. (2005). Multiplex PCR for identification of Campylobacter coli and Campylobacter jejuni from pure cultures and directly on stool samples. Journal of medical microbiology, 54(11), 1043-1047.

Rossler, E., Olivero, C., Soto, L.P., Frizzo, L.S., Zimmermann, J., Rosmini, M.R., Sequeira, G.J., Signorini, M.L. & Zbrun, M.V. (2020). Prevalence, genotypic diversity and detection of virulence genes in thermotolerant Campylobacter at different stages of the poultry meat supply chain. International Journal of Food Microbiology, Aug 2; 326:108641.

Steele, M., Marcone, M., Gyles, C., Chan, V. L. & Odumeru, J. (2006). Enzymatic activity of Campylobacter jejuni hippurate hydrolase. Protein Engineering Design and Selection, 19(1), 17-25.

Vashin, I., Stoyanchev, T., Iliev, M. & Naydenski, H. (2012). Application of polymerase chain reaction and denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis assay of the flagellin gene for direct detection and subtyping of Campylobacter jejuni and Campylobacter coli in avian faecal samples. Bulgarian Journal of Veterinary Medicine, 15(1) 21-29.

Wegmüller, B., Lüthy, J. & Candrian, U. (1993). Direct polymerase chain reaction detection of Campylobacter jejuni and Campylobacter coli in raw milk and dairy products. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 59(7), 2161-2165.

Young, K. T., Davis, L. M. & DiRita, V. J. (2007). Campylobacter jejuni: molecular biology and pathogenesis. Nature Reviews Microbiology , 5(9), 665-679.

Downloads

Published

2022-11-07

How to Cite

Marimuthu, D., Sekar, M., L, G., Vivekanandan, B., Singaram, .B., & Raj, G.D. (2022). Sensitivity of Campylobacter jejuni Virulence genes flaA,mapA and hipO by Polymerase chain reaction. Indian Journal of Veterinary Sciences and Biotechnology, 18(5), 111–114. https://doi.org/10.48165/ijvsbt.18.5.22