Effect of Different Feeding Regimes on Feed Intake, Body Weight and Body Condition Score of Crossbred Cows

Authors

  • Md. Manzarul Islam Pashupalan San shodhan Kendra, College of Veterinary Science & Animal Husbandry, Anand Agricultural University, Anand, Gujarat-388001, India
  • Shailesh V. Shah Pashupalan Sanshodhan Kendra, College of Veterinary Science & Animal Husbandry, Anand Agricultural University, Anand, Gujarat-388001, India
  • Paresh R. Pandya Animal Nutrition Research Station, College of Veterinary Science & Animal Husbandry, Anand Agricultural University, Anand, Gujarat-388001, India
  • Pravin M. Lunagariya Livestock Research Station, College of Veterinary Science & Animal Husbandry, Anand Agricultural University, Anand, Gujarat-388001, India

Keywords:

BCS, Body weight, Crossbred cows, Feed intake, Feeding regimes

Abstract

This study was conducted from 45 d prepartum to 300 d post-partum on 18 crossbred cows, distributed into three treatment groups  comprising six animals in each group. Animals of the T1 (Farmers’ feeding) group were maintained as per the feeding regime, followed by  small and marginal farmers. Animals of T2 (Modified feeding)group were fed with scientific interventions using resources available with  farmers. Animals of the T3 (Farm feeding) group were fed as per feeding followed at Livestock Research Station. Average DMI both on kg/ animal/d and kg/100 kg b.wt. was significantly (p <0.05) higher in T2 (12.45 ± 0.28 and 2.74 ± 0.06) and T3 (12.62 ± 0.22 and 2.81 ± 0.06)  as compared to T1 (9.71 ± 0.20 and 2.24 ± 0.05, respectively) group. Similarly, average DCPI (g/animal/d) was significantly (p <0.05)  higher in T2 (801.87 ± 22.30) and T3 (839.53 ± 16.63) when compared with T1 (543.83 ± 14.83) group. Average DCPI (g/100 kg b.wt.) was  128.49 ± 4.51, 177.40 ± 5.00, and 187.84 ± 4.51 in T1, T2, and T3 groups, respectively, which differed significantly (p <0.05) among each  other. Average TDNI both on kg/animal/d and kg/100 kg b.wt. was significantly (p <0.05) higher in T2 (7.13 ± 0.16 and 1.57 ± 0.04) and  T3 (7.30 ± 0.13 and 1.63 ± 0.04) as compared to T1 (4.82 ± 0.10 and 1.11 ± 0.03, respectively) group. Irrespective of periods, the overall  body weight (kg) of crossbred cows were significantly (p <0.05) higher in the T2 (459.32 ± 5.69) and T3 (458.55 ± 5.72) as compared to  the T1 (444.58 ± 6.41) group of animals. The average body condition score was maximum in T3 (3.29 ± 0.02) followed by T2 (3.07 ± 0.03)  and T1 (2.89 ± 0.03) groups, which differed significantly (p <0.05). It may be concluded from the present study that the feeding regime  significantly influenced feed intake, body weight, and body condition score of crossbred cows. 

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Agenas, S., Burstedt, E. & Holtenius, K. (2003). Effects of feeding intensity during the dry period. 1. Feed intake, body weight, and milk production. Journal of Dairy Science, 86, 870-882.

AOAC (2000). Official Methods of Analysis. 17th ed. Association of Analytical Chemists. Washington, DCUSA.

Banuvalli, N., Bhaskaran, R., Krishnamurthy, U., Gururaj, P.M., Harish Kumar, K.P. & Ramesh, H.S. (2014). Effect of body condition score at parturition on post-partum productive and reproductive performance in crossbred dairy cows. International Journal of Livestock Research, 4(8), 5-13.

Bindal, Sameer. (2012). Effect of challenge feeding on performance and economics of milk production of crossbred cows. M.V.Sc. Thesis, National Dairy Research Institute, Karnal, Haryana, India.

Edmonson, A.J., Lean, I.J., Weaver, L.D. & Farver, T. (1989). A body condition scoring chart for Holstein dairy cows. Journal of Dairy Science, 72, 68-78.

Ferguson, J.D. & Otto, K.A. (1989). Managing body condition score in dairy cows. In: Proceedings of Cornell Nutrition Conference Feed Manufacturers, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York, p.75.

Gadariya, M.R., Dhami, A.J. & Patel, J.M. (2004). Body condition scoring: A valuable management tool for dairy herds. Indian Dairyman, 56(7), 39-41.

Garg, M.R., Bhanderi, B.M., Goswami, A. & Shankhpal, S. (2016). Effect of balanced feeding on SNF content of milk: a field study. International Journal of Developmental Research, 6(11), 10054-10059.

Garg, M.R., Bhanderi, B.M., Sherasia, P.L., Gulati, S.K. & Scott, T.W. (2004). Feeding strategies to reduce the cost of milk production. In: Proceedings of XI Animal Nutrition Conference on Nutritional Technologies for commercialization of animal production systems held at JNKVV, Jabalpur, M.P. India.

Gupta, B.N. (1991). Pretreatment of low-quality roughages to improve their nutritive value. In: Proceedings of the International Animal Nutrition Worker’ Conference for Asia and Pacific. Bangalore, India, p. 315.

Khan, M.A.A., Islam, M.N., Khan, M.A.S. & Akbar, M.A. (2004). Effects of feeding high and low energy levels during late pregnancy on the performance of crossbred dairy cows and their calves. Asian-Australasian Journal of Animal Science, 17(7), 947-953.

Kumar Amrith, M.N., Sundereshan, K., Suryanarayana, J., Murthy, T. Rao. & Sampth, S.R. (1980). Availability of nutrients to graded buffaloes in East- Godavari District, Andhra Pradesh. In: Proceedings of the seminar on buffalo reproduction, Hyderabad, India.

Lawrence, D.C., O’Donovan, M., Boland, T.M., Lewis, E. & Kennedy, E. (2015). The effect of concentrate feeding amount and feeding strategy on milk production, dry matter intake, and energy partitioning of autumn-calving Holstein-Friesian cows. Journal of Dairy Science, 98, 338-348.

Lopez, H., Satter, L.D. & Wiltbank, M.C. (2004). Relationship between level of milk production and estrous behavior of lactating dairy cows. Animal Reproduction Science, 81, 209-223.

Panigrahi, B., Pandey, H.N. & Patnaik, AK (2005). Effect of prepartum feeding of crossbred cows on growth performance, metabolic profile, and immune status of calves. Asian-Australasian Journal of Animal Science, 18, 661-666.

Patel, M., Lakhani, G.P., Ghosh, S., Nayak, S., Roy, B., Baghel, R.P.S. & Jain, A. (2018). Effect of body condition score on milk production, milk composition, and reproductive performance of lactating Murrah Buffaloes. International Journal of Current Microbiology and Applied Sciences, 7(11), 1204-1212.

Prasad, S. & Tomar, O.S. (1996). Effect of body condition at calving and post-partum level of feeding on the performance traits of crossbred cattle-body condition score and body weight. Indian Journal of Dairy Science, 49(2), 70.

Ranjhan, S.K. (1998). Nutrient Requirements of Livestock and Poultry. Indian Council of Agricultural Research. New Delhi, India.. Ryan, G., Murphya, J.J., Crossea, S. & Rathb, M. (2003). The effect of a pre-calving diet on post-calving cow performance. Livestock Production Science, 79, 61-71.

Sahoo, J.K., Das, S.K., Sethy, K., Mishra, S.K., Swain, R.K., Mishra, P.C. & Satapathy, D. (2016). Effect of supplementation of mineral mixture and bypass fat on the performance of crossbred cattle. Journal of Animal Research, 6(4), 611-618.

Santos, J.E.P., Bilby, T.R., Thatcher, W.W., Staples, C.R. & Silvestre, F.T. (2008). Long-chain fatty acids of diet as factors influencing reproduction in cattle. Reproduction in Domestic Animal, 43(2), 23-30.

Singh, J., Singh, B.M., Wadhwa, M. & Bakshi, M.P.S. (2003). Effect of level of feeding on the performance of crossbred cows during pre and post-partum periods. Asian-Australasian Journal of Animal Science, 16, 1749-1754.

Suharyono., Hardani, S.N.W., Sitoresmi, P.D. & Adiarto. (2018). Effect of feed supplementation in Holstein Friesian crossbred cows at first quarter on the production and quality of milk. In: Proceedings of the IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science. 119, 1-12.

Downloads

Published

2022-09-19

How to Cite

Islam, M.M., Shah, S.V., Pandya, P.R., & Lunagariya, P.M. (2022). Effect of Different Feeding Regimes on Feed Intake, Body Weight and Body Condition Score of Crossbred Cows . Indian Journal of Veterinary Sciences and Biotechnology, 18(2), 7–11. Retrieved from https://acspublisher.com/journals/index.php/ijvsbt/article/view/2146