Effect of Supplementation of Rumen-Protected Methionineand Lysine on Digestibility and Rumen Fermentation inFemale Calves
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.48165/ijvsbt.20.3.07Keywords:
Crossbred calves, Digestibility, Rumen fermentation, Rumen-protected methionine and lysine, TMRAbstract
The study was performed on crossbred (Kankrej×HF) female calves to evaluate the supplementation effect of rumen-protected methionine (RPM) and lysine (RPL) on digestibility of nutrients and rumen fermentation. For this study, twelve crossbred female calves were randomly allotted to two groups T1 and T2 on their body weight for a period of 98 days. Calves in the T1 group were fed basal TMR to meet the nutrient requirement as per ICAR (2013) standard and those in T2 were fed basal TMR same as T1 + 2 g/kg DM RPMand 6 g/kg DM RPL. The digestion trial was conducted on all the experimental calves during the 11th week of experimental period. The collection period was of 7 days during which the representative samples of daily TMR fed, leftover and output of faeces were collected and analyzed. The rumen studies were carried out during last month of experiment. The rumen liquor samples were collected from experimental animals at 0, 2, 4 and 6 h post-feeding through a stomach tube against negative pressure created by a suction pump. There was no effect on digestibility coefficients of nutrients between the treatment groups. However, the percent fecal nitrogen excretion as nitrogen intake (N efficiency) was significantly (p<0.05) lower in T2 as compared to T1. Thus supplementation of RPM and RPL prevent the detrimental effect of ammonia and GHG on environment by improving nitrogen efficiency. The crossbred female calves fed basal TMR supplemented with rumen protected methionine and rumen protected lysine improved soluble nitrogen and total nitrogen of strained rumen liquor. However, ruminal pH, total volatile fatty acids, ammonia nitrogen, and non-protein nitrogen did not show any significant difference among treatment groups.
Downloads
References
Abbasi, I. H. R., Abbasi, F., Liu, L., Bodinga, B. M., Abdel-Latif, M. A., Swelum, A. A., & Cao, Y. (2019). Rumen-protected methionine a feed supplement to low dietary protein: effects on microbial population, gases production and fermentation characteristics. AMB Express, 9(1), 1-10.
Aranda, E., Mendoza, G. D., Garcı́a-Bojalil, C., & Castrejón, F. (2001). Growth of heifers grazing stargrass complemented with sugar cane, urea and a protein supplement. Livestock Production Science, 71(2-3), 201-206.
Benmar, H. A., Rezayazdi, K., & Banadaki, M. D. (2011). Effect of supplementation of different level protein diets with rumen protected methionine and lysine on performance and ruminal parameters of Holstein dairy cows in early lactation. Iranian Journal of Animal Science, 42(3), 221-230.
Bequette, B. J., Backwell, F. R. C., & Crompton, L. A. (1998). Current concepts of amino acid and protein metabolism in the mammary gland of the lactating ruminant. Journal of Dairy Science, 81(9), 2540-2559.
Bossche, T.V., Goossens, K., Ampe, B., Haesaert, G., Sutter,J.D. & Boever, J.L. (2023). Effect of supplementing rumen-protected methionine, lysine, and histidine to low-protein diets on the performance and nitrogen balance of dairy cows. Journal of Dairy Science, 106(3), 1790-1802.
Cabrera, E. J. I., Mendoza, M. G. D., Aranda, I. E., Garcia-Bojalil, C., Barcena, G. R., & Ramos, J. J. A. (2000). Saccharomyces cerevisiae and nitrogenous supplementation in growing steers grazing tropical pastures. Animal Feed Science and Technology, 83(1), 49-55.
Clark, J. H. (1975). Lactational responses to postruminal administration of proteins and amino acids. Journal of Dairy Science, 58(8), 1178-1197.
Doepel, L., Pacheco, D., Kennelly, J. J., Hanigan, M. D., Lopez, I. F., & Lapierre, H. (2004). Milk protein synthesis as a function of amino acid supply. Journal of Dairy Science, 87(5), 1279-1297.
Gami, R., Thakur, S. S., & Mahesh, M. S. (2015). Protein sparing effect of dietary rumen protected lysine plus methionine in growing Murrah buffaloes (Bubalus bubalis). Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, India Section B: Biological Sciences, 87, 885-891.
Gavade, V. S., Gadegaonkar, G. M., Ramteke, B. N., Pagdhuneand, A. G. & Kanduri, A. B. (2019). Effect of supplementation of rumen protected methionine and lysine in crossbred calves. International Journal Livestock Research, 4(19), 182-188.
Hedqvist, H., & Udén, P. (2006). Measurement of soluble protein degradation in the rumen. Animal Feed Science and Technology, 126(1-2), 1-21.
Hungate, R. E. (1966). The rumen and its microbes. Academic Press, New York, USA. 533.
ICAR (2013). Nutrient Requirements of Cattle and Buffalo. Indian Council of Agricultural Research, New Delhi, India.
Kandil, A. M., Boraei, M. A., El-Sysy, M. A. I. & Abdeltawab, A. S. (2017). Effect of protected methionine supplementation on productive performance of growing buffalo calves. Egyptian Journal of Nutrition and Feeds, 20(2), 163-173.
Lapierre, H., Pacheco, D., Berthiaume, R., Ouellet, D. R., Schwab, C. G., Dubreuil, P., & Lobley, G. E. (2006). What is the true supply of amino acids for a dairy cow? Journal of dairy science, 89, E1-E14.
Leonardi, C., Stevenson, M., & Armentano, L. E. (2003). Effect of two levels of crude protein and methionine supplementation on performance of dairy cows. Journal of Dairy Science, 86(12), 4033-4042.
Merchen, N. R., & Titgemeyer, E. C. (1992). Manipulation of amino acid supply to the growing ruminant. Journal of Animal Science, 70(10), 3238-3247.
Movaliya, J. K., Dutta, K. S., Savsani, H. H., Gadariya, M. R., Murthy, K. S. & Bhadaniya, A. R. (2013). Growth performance, nutrient utilization and economics of feeding bypass methionine and lysine in Jaffrabadi heifers. Indian Journal of Animal Nutrition, 30(2), 124-127.
National Research Council. (2001). Nutrient Requirements of Dairy Cattle (7th revised edition) National Academies Press. Washington, DC, USA.
Nichols, J. R., Schingoethe, D. J., Maiga, H. A., Brouk, M. J., & Piepenbrink, M. S. (1998). Evaluation of corn distillers grains and ruminally protected lysine and methionine for lactating dairy cows. Journal of Dairy Science, 81(2), 482-491.
Noftsger, S., St-Pierre, N. R., & Sylvester, J. T. (2005). Determination of rumen degradability and ruminal effects of three sources of methionine in lactating cows. Journal of Dairy Science, 88(1), 223-237.
Robinson, P. H., Chalupa, W., Sniffen, C. J., Julien, W. E., Sato, H., Fujieda, T., & Suzuki, H. (1999). Influence of postruminal supplementation of methionine and lysine, isoleucine, or all three amino acids on intake and chewing behavior, ruminal fermentation, and milk and milk component production. Journal of Animal Science, 77(10), 2781-2792.
Sai, S., Chaurasiya, M., Thakur, S. S., Kewalramani, N. & Kaur, J. (2016). Performance of Karan-fries calves as affected by supplementation of rumen-protected methionine plus lysine and choline. Indian Journal of Animal Nutrition, 33(1), 27-32.
Schwab, C. G., Satter, L. D., & Clay, A. B. (1976). Response of lactating dairy cows to abomasal infusion of amino acids. Journal of Dairy Science, 59(7), 1254-1270.
Snedecor, G. W., & Cochran, W. G. (1994). Statistical Methods (8th ed.). New Delhi, India: Oxford and IBH Publishing Co. Pvt. Ltd.
Socha, M. T., Putnam, D. E., Garthwaite, B. D., Whitehouse, N. L., Kierstead, N. A., Schwab, C. G., ... & Robert, J. C. (2005). Improving intestinal amino acid supply of pre-and postpartum dairy cows with rumen-protected methionine and lysine. Journal of Dairy Science, 88(3), 1113-1126.
Soltan, M. A., Mujalli, A. M., Mandour, M. A. & Abeer, M. E. S. (2012). Effect of dietary rumen protected methionine and/or choline supplementation on rumen fermentation characteristics and productive performance of early lactating cows. Pakistan Journal of Nutrition, 11(3), 221-230.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Indian Journal of Veterinary Sciences and Biotechnology
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
How to Cite
