Profitability Analysis of Backyard Poultry Farming in Kheda  District of Middle Gujarat, India: Triple Cross Vs Indigenous  Chicken

Authors

  • Ashish B Mahera Department of Marketing Management, International Agribusiness Management Institute, Anand Agricultural University, Anand, 388110, Gujarat, India
  • Snehal Mishra Department of Agribusiness Economics and Policies, International Agribusiness Management Institute, Anand Agricultural University, Anand, 388110, Gujarat, India
  • Nikesh J Bhagora Poultry Research Station, Kamdhenu University, Anand, 388110, Gujarat, India
  • Yogesh A Lad Department of Human Resource Development & Personnel Management, International Agribusiness Management Institute, Anand Agricultural University, Anand, 388110, Gujarat, India
  • M Sathish Kumar Department of Human Resource Development & Personnel Management, International Agribusiness Management Institute, Anand Agricultural University, Anand, 388110, Gujarat, India

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.48165/ijvsbt.20.2.20

Keywords:

Backyard poultry farming, Indigenous chicken, Profitability analysis, Triple-cross chicken

Abstract

Backyard poultry is an age-old practice in India, particularly in rural areas, where households raise small groups of local chickens for  family food. Though India’s poultry industry has proliferated in the previous five decades, it has primarily been limited to the commercial  poultry sector, which is concentrated in and around urban and semi-urban areas. This study aimed to determine the profitability of  backyard poultry production of triple cross and indigenous chicken in the Middle Gujarat region. A well-structured questionnaire was  used to collect data from 15 triple cross and 15 indigenous chicken farmers comprising 30 respondents in Kapadwanj Taluka of Kheda  district in Middle Gujarat. The data were analyzed using profitability analysis and the Garret Ranking technique. Chicks up to the age  of eight weeks killed by predators such as dogs and cats were the major constraint faced by the poultry farmers. The beneficiaries’  second major constraint was a lack of knowledge about the scientific rearing of chickens. Labour cost was the highest of the total cost  of production. Income from selling eggs followed by selling males for meat purposes were major contributors to income generation.  Triple-cross chicken’s net income per unit of 22 birds was Rs. 8617.12, while indigenous chicken’s net income per unit was Rs. 6308.33.  BC ratio of triple cross chicken (2.58) was higher than BC ratio of indigenous chicken (2.20). 

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Ali, M.M. (2015). Emerging prospective of Indian livestock: A study on poultry Industry. Asian Journal of Managerial Science, 4(1), 33-39. Anang, B.T., Yeboah, C., & Agbolosu, A.A. (2013). Profitability of broiler and layer production in the Brong Ahafo region of Ghana. ARPN Journal of Agricultural and Biological Science, 8(5), 1-8.

Baruah, M.S., & Raghav, C.S. (2017). Viability and economics of backyard poultry farming in West Siang district of Arunachal Pradesh, India. International Journal of Food, Agriculture and Veterinary Sciences, 7(1), 9-14.

Chakrabarti, A., Jha, B.K., Sarkar, P.K., & Yadav, V.K. (2020). Performance of Vanaraja and Kaveri poultry chicken in tribal villages of Jharkhand. Journal of Entomology and Zoology Studies, 8(5), 1960-1966.

Dhariya, S.K., Mahadik, R.P., & Mehta, P.G. (2013). Economics of backyard poultry units. Indian Research Journal of Extension Education, 5(2,3), 86-87.

Emokara, C.O., Akinrinmola, F.K., & Emokpae, O.P. (2016). Economics of backyard poultry farming in Benin city, Edo state, Nigeria. Nigerian Journal of Agriculture, Food and Environment, 12(2), 50-57.

Islam, R., Nath, P., Bharali, A., & Borah, R. (2015). Analysis of benefit cost (B:C) ratio of Vanaraja and local chicken of Assam under backyard system of rearing. Journal of Research in Agriculture and Animal Science, 3(7), 7-10.

Kumar, B., Avasthe, R.K., Babu, S., Singh, R., & Pal, P. (2014). Scientific backyard poultry farming: A potent tool for socio-economic stability and nutritional security in Sikkim Himalayan. Research Journal of Animal Husbandry and Dairy Science, 5(1), 30-34.

Maikasuwa, M.A., & Jabo, M.S.M. (2011). Profitability of backyard poultry farming in Sokoto metropolis, Sokoto state, North West, Nigeria. Nigerian Journal of Basic and Applied Science, 19 (1), 25-32.

Nath, B.G., Pathak, P.K., & Mohanty, A.K. (2013). Scientific backyard poultry rearing technology: an approach to awareness and adoption of technology for livelihood development of rural farmers in Sikkim, India. Russian Journal of Agriculture and Socio-Economic Science, 22(3) 38-43.

Rajkumar, U., Rama Rao, S.V., & Sharma, R.P. (2010). Backyard poultry farming-changing the face of rural and tribal livelihoods. Indian Farming, 59, 20-24.

Rath, P.K., Mandal, K.D., & Panda, P. (2015). Backyard poultry farming in India: A call for skill upliftment. Research Journal of Recent Sciences, 4(2), 1-5

Rawat, S.K., & Kamal, K. (2019). Socio-economic aspects of backyard poultry production in Mahoba and Hamirpur districts of Uttar Pradesh. Agro-Economist, 6(1), 15-21.

Sharma, R.P., & Chatterjee, R.N. (2009). Backyard poultry farming and rural food security. Indian Farming, 59(36-37), 48. Sonaiya, E.B. (2004). Direct assessment of nutrient resources in free-range and scavenging systems. World’s Poultry Science Journal, 60, 523-535.

Tufail, M., Sajjad, M., Zulfiqar, M., Sohail, S, M., & Amhad, I. (2012). Economic of backyard poultry in Tehsil Matta district SWAT. Sarhad Journal of Agriculture, 28(3), 485-492.

Weyuma, H., Singh, H., & Megersa, M. (2015). Studies on management practices and constraints of backyard chicken production in selected rural areas of Bishoftu. British Journal of Poultry Sciences, 4(1), 1-11.

Published

2024-03-10

How to Cite

Mahera, .A.B., Mishra, S., Bhagora, N.J., Lad, .Y.A., & Kumar, M.S. (2024). Profitability Analysis of Backyard Poultry Farming in Kheda  District of Middle Gujarat, India: Triple Cross Vs Indigenous  Chicken. Indian Journal of Veterinary Sciences and Biotechnology, 20(2), 94–98. https://doi.org/10.48165/ijvsbt.20.2.20