Seismic Analysis (Zone v) of RCC Building (G+5) with Shear Walls Using Staad. Pro Software

Authors

  • Aazim Nisar M. Tech. Scholar, Department of Civil Engineering, RIMT University, Mandi Gobindgarh, Punjab, India Author
  • Ashish Kumar Assistant Professor, Civil Engineering Department, RIMT University, Mandi Gobindgarh,Punjab India Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.55524/ijirem.2023.10.4.4

Keywords:

Multistory Structure, Seismic Force, STAAD. Pro, Shear-Wall

Abstract

An upright component of a seismic force resisting structure called a shear wall is made to protect  against in-plane lateral forces, which are often caused by  wind and seismic loads. The design of shear walls is  governed by the international residential code and the  international building code in many countries. A shear wall  may withstand loads that are equal to the wall’s plane. The  diaphragm shear is transferred to shear walls and other  vertical components of the seismic force-resisting system  via collectors, sometimes referred to as drag members. In  this study, we have chosen Seismic analysis (zone v) of  RCC building (G+5) with shear walls using STAAD. Pro  software The multistory building (G+5) is the subject of  analysis. The STAAD. Pro, Designing and Analysis  software is used to develop the 3D model of Shear wall and  Building. Giving it constraints that are based on the acting  seismic force and wind loads on buildings rendered the  nodes weak, so we added a shear wall to reinforce that  nodes. Following the inclusion of the building's shear wall  and analysis using STAAD. Pro in standard format. After  analyzing the effect & shear wall's position on the building  & comparing results with old building design without shear  wall, it was determined that the addition & location of shear  walls in multistory structures strengthens the structure's  weak points and enables it to withstand lateral loads, wind  loads, and earthquake loads. 

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

K. Kokubu, J. G. Cabrera, and A. Ueno, “Compaction properties of roller compacted concrete,” Cem. Concr. Compos., vol. 18, no. 2, pp. 109–117, Jan. 1996, doi: 10.1016/0958- 9465(95)00007-0.

M. Varma, V. B. Maji, and B. A, “Influence of rock joints on longitudinal wave velocity using experimental and numerical techniques,” Int. J. Rock Mech. Min. Sci., vol. 141, p. 104699, May 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.ijrmms.2021.104699.

M. D. Goel, D. Agrawal, and A. Choubey, “Collapse Behavior of RCC Building under Blast Load,” Procedia Eng., vol. 173, pp. 1943–1950, 2017, doi: 10.1016/j.proeng.2016.12.256.

P. P. Chandurkar and Dr. P. S. Pajgade, “Seismic Analysis of RCC Building with and Without Shear Wall,” vol. 3, no. 3, p. pp-1805-1810, Jun. 2013.

A. Baghel, U. Kesharwani, and G. Sachdeva, “Best Position of R.C. Shear Wall due to seismic loads,” Int. J. Eng. Res. Appl., vol. 07, no. 02, pp. 48–51, Feb. 2017, doi: 10.9790/9622- 0702024851.

Er. K. Rana and V. Mehta, Seismic Analysis of RCC Building with Shear Wall at Different Locations Using STAAD Pro, vol. Vol. 5. International Journal of Civil and Structural Engineering Research, 2017. [Online]. Available: www.researchpublish.com

C. Jeetendra, K. Suresh, and A. Hussain, “Analysis of repairs and rehabilitation of R.C.C Structures,” Int. J. Eng. Assoc., vol. 4, pp. 47–49, Aug. 2015.

K. Patel and S. Thakkar, “Analysis of CFT, RCC and Steel Building Subjected to Lateral Loading,” Procedia Eng., vol. 51, pp. 259–265, Jan. 2013, doi: 10.1016/j.proeng.2013.01.035.

C.-H. Zhai, Z. Zheng, S. Li, and L.-L. Xie, “Seismic analyses of a RCC building under mainshock–aftershock seismic sequences,” Soil Dyn. Earthq. Eng., vol. 74, pp. 46–55, Jul. 2015, doi: 10.1016/j.soildyn.2015.03.006.

Downloads

Published

2023-08-30

How to Cite

Seismic Analysis (Zone v) of RCC Building (G+5) with Shear Walls Using Staad. Pro Software . (2023). International Journal of Innovative Research in Engineering & Management, 10(4), 23–40. https://doi.org/10.55524/ijirem.2023.10.4.4