Molecular Docking: A Review Paper
Keywords:
Docking, Ligand, Molecular, Models, OrientationAbstract
Molecular docking basically explains about the orientation of a molecule preferred to the other molecule in a manner as in when they attach to each other in order to get a steady complex. By using scoring functions further the power of alliance or the irrevocable affinity of the different molecules is predicted by the preferred orientation of the two molecules. These interactions, which are achieved by molecular docking between important biological components such as proteins, peptides, nucleic acid, carbohydrates, and lipids, are crucial in signal transduction. Further, these interactions between two molecules which are being performed by the help of molecular docking also helps in predicting the type of signals produced. Therefore, molecular docking is helpful in predicting both strength and type of signals produced by the molecules. Because of its ability to predict the coupling compliance of small particle ligands to the appropriate target restriction site, molecular docking is among the most often used strategies in structure-based drug design. Characterization of the coupling conduct assumes a significant job in discerning structure of medications just as to clarify crucial biochemical procedures.
Downloads
References
O. Roche, R. Kiyama, and C. L. Brooks, “Ligand-protein database: Linking protein-ligand complex structures to binding data,” J. Med. Chem., 2001, doi: 10.1021/jm000467k.
L. Hu, M. L. Benson, R. D. Smith, M. G. Lerner, and H. A. Carlson, “Binding MOAD (Mother of All Databases),” Proteins Struct. Funct. Genet., 2005, doi: 10.1002/prot.20512.
J. J. Irwin and B. K. Shoichet, “ZINC - A free database of commercially available compounds for virtual screening,” J. Chem. Inf. Model., 2005, doi: 10.1021/ci049714+.
H. M. Berman et al., “The Protein Data Bank,” Nucleic Acids Research. 2000, doi: 10.1093/nar/28.1.235.
A. Pozzan, “Molecular Descriptors and Methods for Ligand Based Virtual High Throughput Screening in Drug Discovery,” Curr. Pharm. Des., 2006, doi: 10.2174/138161206777585247.
P. C. D. Hawkins, A. G. Skillman, and A. Nicholls, “Comparison of shape-matching and docking as virtual screening tools,” J. Med. Chem., 2007, doi: 10.1021/jm0603365.
S. F. Sousa, P. A. Fernandes, and M. J. Ramos, “Protein ligand docking: Current status and future challenges,” Proteins: Structure, Function and Genetics. 2006, doi: 10.1002/prot.21082.
G. M. Morris et al., “Automated docking using a Lamarckian genetic algorithm and an empirical binding free energy function,” J. Comput. Chem., 1998, doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1096- 987X(19981115)19:14<1639::AID-JCC10>3.0.CO;2-B.
G. M. Morris, D. S. Goodsell, R. Huey, and A. J. Olson, “Distributed automated docking of flexible ligands to proteins: Parallel applications of AutoDock 2.4,” J. Comput. Aided. Mol. Des., 1996, doi: 10.1007/BF00124499.
D. S. Goodsell and A. J. Olson, “Automated docking of substrates to proteins by simulated annealing,” Proteins Struct. Funct. Bioinforma., 1990, doi: 10.1002/prot.340080302.
M. Hendlich, “Databases for protein-ligand complexes,” 1998, doi: 10.1107/S0907444998007124.
