Seismic Analysis of Vertically Irregular RC Building Frame With and Without Shear Wall Using NBC 105:2020

Authors

  • Basu Dhakal M.Tech Scholar, Department of Civil Engineering, RIMT University, Mandi Gobindgarh, Punjab, India Author
  • Richika Rathore Assistant Professor, Department of Civil Engineering, RIMT University, Mandi Gobindgarh, Punjab, India Author

Keywords:

Base Shear, Storey Shear, Seismic Analysis, Storey Drift

Abstract

Buildings will always have some kind of  irregularity about them. The behaviour of buildings with  typical types of irregularities, including vertical and planar  ones, has to be examined, especially in the context of  earthquakes. The fundamental goal of earthquake  engineering is to design and construct a structure in such a  manner that the damage to the building and its structural  components during an earthquake is minimised by taking the  necessary safeguards. Seismic excitations may cause a wide  range of damage to buildings. Damages in the system are not  uniform nor consistent, even when accounting for the same  structural structure, area, and earthquake. A building's  seismic behaviour is determined by a number of factors,  including the building's structural system, the nature of the  earthquake, the building's quality, the soil in its location, and  any repairs that have been made. The current research shows  how both typical and atypical structures behave. Ten-story  buildings are the focus of the current investigation. ETABS 2016 was used to create the building's model. This thesis  analyses both regular and irregular schedules. For the sake of  analysis, the X and Y axes are subjected to a variety of loads,  including dead load, live load, and seismic load. According  to NBC 105:2020, a number of load configurations are taken  into account. An investigation into the seismic behaviour of  buildings with regular and irregular plans is presented in this  thesis. The primary goal of this study is to compare the  seismic performance of buildings with regular and irregular  floor plans. The current research analyses models of RCC  buildings with G+9 storeys and both regular and irregular  floor plans. Using the ETABS programme, we do a dynamic  study of the model. Final comparisons of seismic response  findings are made between various time periods; base shear,  storey shear, member forces, overturning moments,  displacement, stiffness, and drifts. 

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Milind V. Mohod “Effect Of Shape And Plan Configuration On Seismic response Of Structure”International Journal Of Scientific & Technology Research Volume 4.2015.

Mohammed yousuf, P.M. shimpale(2013). Dynamic Analysis of Reinforced Concrete Building with Plan Irregularities. International Journal of Emerging Technology and Advanced Engineering, Volume 3, Issue 9, September 2013

Arvindreddy, R.J.Fernandes, “Seismic Analysis of RC Regular and Irregular Frame Structures”, IJERT, Vol.2, Issue: 5, Aug 2015.

Prof. S.S. Patil, ,Miss. S.A. Ghadge, ,Prof. C.G. Konapure, , Prof. Mrs. C.A. Ghadge. “ Seismic Analysis of High-Rise Building by Response Spectrum Method” International Journal Of Computational Engineering Research (Ijceronline.Com) Vol. 3 Issue. 3,march 2013

S.K. Ahirwar, S.K. Jain and M. M. Pande (2008)“Earthquake loads on multistorey buildings as per is:1893-1984 and is: 1893- 2002: a comparative study” The 14thWorld Conference on Earthquake Engineering October 12-17, 2008, Beijing, China.

Sarkar P, Prasad A Meher, Menon Devdas, 2010, Vertical geometric irregularity in stepped building frames, Engineering Structures 32 (2010) 2175–2182

Dnyaneshkumar H. Lanjewar, Prof. Ameya Khedikar(2017) “Seismic Analysis of Unsymmetrical RCC Structures’’ International Journal of Innovative Research in Science,Engineering and Technology Vol. 6, Special Issue 11.

Ramanujam I V and Dr H Sudarsana Rao.” Comparative Study Of Seismic Forces Based On Static And Dynamic Analysis As Per Is: 1893 -2002” issn 2319 – 6009 www.ijscer.com vol. 4, no. 1, february 2015.

D.R. Panchal and P.M Marathe. D. R. Panchal and P. M. Marathe, “Comparative Study of R.C.C., Steel and Composite (G+30) storey building”, Institute of Technology,Nirma University, Ahmedabad – 382 481 , pp- 1-6, December, 2011.

Etabs Version 9.70 (1997), Computers and Structures, Inc, Berkeley, California, International Code Council, Inc (2000) International Building Code.

Ravikumar C.M., BabuN.K.S.,“Effect of irregular configurations on Seismic Vulnerability of RC Buildings”Architecture Research2012,2(3):20-26DOI: 10.5923/j.arch.20120203.01.

Siddiqui U.H. and, H. S. Vidyadhara, “Seismic Analysis of Earthquake Resistant Multi Bay Multi Storied 3D-RC Frame” International Journal of Engineering Research & Technology (IJERT) ISSN: 2278-0181 Vol. 2 Issue 10, October–2013.

Singh Y. and Gade P., “Seismic Behaviour of Buildings Located on Slopes” An Analytical Study and Some Observations From Sikkim Earthquake of September 18, 2011. 15th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering Journal 2012.

Ashraf Habibullah , S.E. Physical Object Based Analysis and Design Modelling of Shear Wall Systems Using Etabs, Computers & Structures, Inc., Berkeley, California (2003)

Bhatt, P., MacGinley, T.J., & Choo, B.S. (2005). Reinforced Concrete Design: Design Theory and Examples, Third Edition (3rd ed.). CRC Press. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203404386

Downloads

Published

2022-10-30

How to Cite

Seismic Analysis of Vertically Irregular RC Building Frame With and Without Shear Wall Using NBC 105:2020 . (2022). International Journal of Innovative Research in Engineering & Management, 9(5), 168–174. Retrieved from https://acspublisher.com/journals/index.php/ijirem/article/view/10747