Analytical Investigation on Improving Safety Performance in Construction Sites

Authors

  • Faizan Nazir Zahid M. Tech Scholar, Department of Civil Engineering, RIMT University, Mandi Gobingarh, Punjab Author
  • Er Sakshi Bhatia Assistant Professor, Department of Civil Engineering, RIMT University, Mandi Gobingarh, Punjab, India Author

Keywords:

Construction Dust, Construction Noise, Personal Protective Equipment

Abstract

Construction industries are known to be  hazardous due to complex tasks, change of work location,  climatic conditions and temporary organizational  management. The consequences of these hazards may  involve occupational diseases, injuries and fatality. Injuries  and accident rates are high in a construction site when  compared with other manufacturing industries. Safety is  one of the key factors in construction sites to mitigate the  severity of the risk. Assessing the performance of the site  concerning safety is an important part of the management  system as it provides information on the safety of the  worker as well as the task. Hence the aim of this research  is to investigate the site safety performance and propose a  methodology for enhancement. This is done in basically  four parts viz., quantification of risk involved in each task,  accounting for unsafe supervision, selection of right  worker for the right task and usage e.g., PPEs. Safety  performance cannot be measured only with the  accidents/injuries in the site but the factors which influence  the unplanned events have to be highlighted while  determining the performance rate. The factors include the  task/conditions of the site. Risk involved in each task is  quantified using Hazard Identification and Risk  Assessment (HIRA) technique. The hazards in the sites are  identified through direct observation and previous safety  reports and the risk values are determined using likelihood  and severity ratings of each hazard. It is known that the  construction site has 13.3% of low risk, 37.7 % of medium  risk, 44.4 % of high risk and 4.6 % of extreme risk. The  relative percentage of risk involved in each task is  calculated and it is found that crane operation (10.4%),  height work (9.1%) and drilling (8.8%) are the three major  tasks with high risk. It is observed that in the particular  construction site the relative percentage of low risk is very  less. Furthermore, it can be said that by task-based risk  quantification the builders/owners may look for suitable or  alternate control measures to reduce the risk level to as low  as reasonably practicable. This will automatically improve  the performance of the site. 

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

M. Gunduz, M.T. Birgonul and M. Ozdemir, Development of a safety performance index assessment tool by using a fuzzy structural equation model for construction sites, Automation in Construction, 85 (2018), 124- 134.

O. Rozenfeld, R. Sacks, Y. Rosenfeld and H. Baum, Construction job safety analysis, Safety science, 48 (4) (2010), 491-498.

IWH. Fung, VWY. Vivian, TY. Lo, and LLH. Lu, Developing a risk assessment model for construction safety, International Journal of Project Management, 28 (6) (2010), 593-600.

C.F. Chi, C.C. Yang and Z.L Chen. In-depth accident analysis of electrical fatalities in the construction industry, International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, 39 (4) (2009), 635-644.

T. Aksorn and B.H.W. Hadikusumo, Critical success factors influencing safety program performance in Thai construction projects, Safety Science, 46 (4) (2008), 709- 727.

M. Gunduz and B Ahsan, Construction safety factors assessment through frequency adjusted importance index, International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, 64 (2018), 155-162.

A. Pinto, I.L. Nunes and R.A. Ribeiro, Occupational risk assessment in construction industry–Overview and reflection, Safety Science, 49 (5) (2011), 616-624.

J.W. Garrett and J. Teizer, Human factors analysis classification system relating to human error awareness taxonomy in construction safety, Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 135 (8) (2009), 754-763.

T. Vondráčková, V. Voštová, and V. Nývlt, The human factor as a cause of failures in building structures, MATEC Web of Conferences, 93 (2017), Article no. 03005.

A. Atkinson, Human error in the management of building projects, Construction Management and Economics, 16 (3) (1998), 339-349.

G. S. Beriha, B. Patnaik, S. S. Mahapatra and S. Padhee, Assessment of safety performance in Indian industries using fuzzy approach, Expert Systems with Applications, 39 (3) (2012), 3311-3323.

B. H. Guo, T. W. Yiu and V. A. González, Predicting safety behavior in the construction industry: Development and test of an integrative model, Safety Science, 84 (2016), 1-11.

M. Lu, C. M. Cheung, H. Li and S. C. Hsu, Understanding the relationship between safety investment and safety performance of construction projects through agent-based modelling, Accident Analysis and Prevention, 94 (2016), 8- 17.

A. Charehzehi and A. Ahankoob, Enhancement of safety performance at construction site, International Journal of Advances in Engineering & Technology, 5 (1) (2012), 303- 312.

Y. Khosravi, H. Asilian Mahabadi, E. Hajizadeh, N. Hassanzadeh Rangi, H. Bastani, A. Khavanin and S.B. Mortazavi, Modeling the factors affecting unsafe behavior in the construction industry from safety supervisors' perspective, Journal of Research in Health Sciences, 14 (1) (2013), 29-35.

Z. Wu, X. Zhang and M. Wu, Mitigating construction dust pollution: State of the art and the way forward, Journal of Cleaner Production, 112 (2016) 1658-1666.

E. Tjoe Nij, S. Hilhorst, T. Spee, J. Spierings, F. Steffens, Dust control measures in the construction industry." Annals of Occupational Hygiene, 47 (3) (2003), 211-218.

S. Fan, Y.W. Wong, L. Shen, W. Lu, T. Wang and A. Yu, The effectiveness of Dust bubbles on dust control in the process of concrete drilling, Safety Science, 50 (5) (2012), 1284-1289.

B.D. Aggarwal, Worker Education Level is a Factor in Self compliance with Dust-preventive Methods among Small scale Agate Industrial Workers, Journal of Occupational Health, 55 (4) (2013), 312-317.

P.A. Koushki, N. Kartam and N. Al-Mutairi, Workers' perceptions and awareness of noise pollution at construction sites in Kuwait, Civil Engineering and Environmental Systems, 21 (2) (2004), 127-136.

M. Geetha and D. Ambika, Study on noise pollution at construction site, International Journal of Research in Engineering and Technology, 4 (2) (2015), 420–421.

H. Guo, Y. Yu and M. Skitmore, Visualization technology based construction safety management: A review. Automation in Construction, 73 (2017), 135-144.

X. Huang and J. Hinze, Analysis of construction worker fall accidents." Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 129 (3) (2003), 262-271.

Y. Kang, Use of fall protection in the US construction industry, Journal of Management in Engineering, 34 (6) (2018), Article no. 04018045.

M. Suárez Cebador, J.C. Rubio-Romero and A. López Arquillos, A. Severity of electrical accidents in the construction industry in Spain, Journal of Safety Research, 48 (2014), 63-70.

G.X. Chen and D.E. Fosbroke, Work-related fatal-injury risk of construction workers by occupation and cause of death, Human and Ecological Risk Assessment, 4 (6) (1998), 1371-1390.

J.C. Cawley and B.C. Brenner, Occupational electrical injuries in the US, 2003–2009, IEEE IAS Electrical Safety Workshop, (2012), 1-5.

C.A. Janicak, Occupational fatalities due to electrocutions in the construction industry, Journal of Safety Research, 39 (6) (2008), 617-621.

Z.Z. Wang and C. Chen, Fuzzy comprehensive Bayesian network-based safety risk assessment for metro construction projects. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 70 (2017), 330-342.

G. Carter and S. D. Smith, Safety hazard identification on construction projects, Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 132 (2) (2006), 197-205.

A. M. Saedi, J. J. Thambirajah and A. Pariatamby, A HIRARC model for safety and risk evaluation at a hydroelectric power generation plant, Safety Science, 70 (2014), 308-315.

M. Kraus, Risk assessments of contemporary accidents in construction industry, MATEC Web of Conferences, EDP Sciences, 146 (2018), Article no. 03004.

S. Al-Anbari, A. Khalina, A. Alnuaimi, A. Normariah and A. Yahya, Risk assessment of safety and health (RASH) for building construction, Process Safety and Environmental Protection, 94 (2015), 149-158.

S.M. El-Sayegh, Risk assessment and allocation in the UAE construction industry, International Journal of Project Management, 26 (4) (2008), 431- 438.

S.N.H. Husin, A.B. Mohamad, S.R.S. Abdullah and N. Anuar, Chemical health risk assessment at the chemical and biochemical engineering laboratory, Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 60 (2012), 300-307.

Castiglia, F., and M. Giardina. Analysis of operator human errors in hydrogen refuelling stations: Comparison between

human rate assessment techniques. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy 38, no. 2 (2013): 1166-1176.

Jahangiri, Mehdi, Reza Jafari Nodoushan, Farzan Madadizadeh, and Hossein Fallah. "Assessment of the probability of human error occurring in the process of appendectomy operation using SPAR-H method." Occupational Medicine Quarterly Journal 12, no. 2 (2020): 17-28.

M. Suárez Cebador, J.C. Rubio-Romero and A. López Arquillos, A. Severity of electrical accidents in the construction industry in Spain, Journal of Safety Research, 48 (2014), 63-70.

Downloads

Published

2022-10-30

How to Cite

Analytical Investigation on Improving Safety Performance in Construction Sites . (2022). International Journal of Innovative Research in Engineering & Management, 9(5), 64–73. Retrieved from https://acspublisher.com/journals/index.php/ijirem/article/view/10733