Enhancing Robotic Arm Performance: Integrating Arduino Control and Aerodynamic Principles for 6 Degrees of Freedom
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.55524/ijirem.2023.10.3.21Keywords:
Robotic Arm, Arduino, Arduino Control, Aerodynamic Principles, 6 Degrees of FreedomAbstract
This review paper explores the integration of Arduino control and aerodynamic principles to enhance the performance of 6 Degrees of Freedom (DOF) robotic arms. Robotic arms have become indispensable in numerous industries, requiring increased precision, efficiency, and adaptability. By leveraging the capabilities of Arduino microcontrollers and incorporating aerodynamic principles, researchers and engineers can optimize the design, control algorithms, and energy efficiency of robotic arms. This paper provides an overview of Arduino control and its advantages for robotic arm control, as well as an exploration of aerodynamic principles applicable to robotic arm systems. It investigates the potential benefits of integrating Arduino control and aerodynamics, such as improved stability, reduced energy consumption, and enhanced speed. Challenges and limitations of the proposed approach are also discussed. Through a comprehensive review of existing literature, case studies, and experimental results, this paper highlights the effectiveness of integrating Arduino control and aerodynamic principles to enhance the performance of 6 DOF robotic arms. The findings contribute to the advancement of robotic arm technology and offer insights for future research and development in this field.
Downloads
References
Arvin, F., & Ahmad, A. (2017). A Review of Inverse Kinematics Techniques for Robotic Manipulator. International Journal of Advanced Research in Computer Science, 8(5), 1490-1495.
Anam, M. A., Ahmed, A., Chowdhury, M. M. R., & Basri, H. (2019). Control of Robotic Manipulator using Arduino. In 2019 7th International Conference on Information and Communication Technology (ICoICT) (pp. 1-6). IEEE.
Zhang, Y., Han, S., Su, S., & Huang, T. (2017). Path Planning of Robot Manipulator Based on Improved Genetic Algorithm. In 2017 IEEE 2nd Advanced Information Technology, Electronic and Automation Control Conference (IAEAC) (pp.
-1751). IEEE.
Thakur, N., & Khairnar, D. (2020). Design and Control of Robotic Arm using Arduino. In 2020 International Conference on Emerging Trends in Electrical, Electronics & Sustainable Energy Systems (ICETEESES) (pp. 1-5). IEEE.
Kumar, S., Bhardwaj, M., & Sachdeva, R. (2018). Analysis of PID Controller for Robotic Manipulator using Arduino. International Journal of Computer Applications, 180(10), 15- 19.
Sonawane, A., & Kulkarni, S. (2021). Design and Development of 6DOF Robotic Arm using Arduino. In 2021 International Conference on Computing, Electronics & Communications Engineering (ICCECE) (pp. 1-5). IEEE.
Cao, X., Xu, C., Wei, B., Wang, Y., & Sun, Y. (2018). Path Planning of Robotic Manipulator Based on Improved PSO Algorithm. In 2018 Chinese Control And Decision Conference (CCDC) (pp. 4791-4796). IEEE.
Kolarevic, N., Subasi, A., & Guzelkaya, M. (2019). 6-DOF Robotic Arm Control via Arduino Based Controller. In 2019 3rd International Conference on Computer Science and Engineering (UBMK) (pp. 515-519). IEEE.
Simon Haykin, Barry Van Veen, 2007 Signals and System, Second Edition John Wiley & Sons.
Oke, B., Ayhan, B., & Kocer, B. (2020). Dynamic Modelling and Control of 6 DOF Robotic Manipulator. In 2020 International Artificial Intelligence and Data Processing Symposium (IDAP) (pp. 1-5). IEEE.
Mohan, V. R., Rajakumar, R., & Murugan, R. (2019). Design and Analysis of Aerodynamic Robotic Arm using Computational Fluid Dynamics. Materials Today: Proceedings, 19, 1122-1130.Nuyujukian, P., Albites Sanabria, J., Saab, J., Pandarinath, C., Jarosiewicz, B., Blabe, C.H., ... & Shenoy, K.V. (2018). Cortical control of a tablet computer by people with paralysis. PLoS ONE, 13(12), e0204566.