Assessment of Groundwater Quality in Anantnag District of Kashmir Valley
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.55524/ijirem.2023.10.4.21Keywords:
Groundwater, pH value, contamination, polluted, TDS, Chloride and NitrateAbstract
Groundwater plays a vital role in meeting the domestic, agricultural, and industrial water demands in the Anantnag district of Kashmir. However, the rapid urbanization, industrialization, and agricultural practices have raised concerns regarding the quality of groundwater in the region. This study aims to assess the groundwater quality in Anantnag, Kashmir, by evaluating key physicochemical parameters and determining the presence of potential contaminants. To achieve the objectives, a systematic sampling campaign was conducted across various locations in Anantnag district. Groundwater samples were collected from representative wells, tube wells, and hand pumps. A comprehensive analysis was carried out to determine the physicochemical parameters including pH, electrical conductivity (EC), total dissolved solids (TDS), and concentrations of major ions such as chloride (Cl-), nitrate (NO3-), sulfate (SO42-), and fluoride (F-). The results of the groundwater analysis revealed significant variations in physicochemical parameters across different sampling locations. The pH levels ranged from acidic to alkaline, with certain areas exhibiting values beyond the acceptable range. Elevated levels of TDS and EC were observed in specific locations, indicating potential contamination sources. The concentrations of chloride, nitrate, sulfate, and fluoride were also found to exceed the permissible limits in some areas, suggesting contamination from anthropogenic activities such as agricultural runoff, industrial discharges, and improper waste management. Furthermore, statistical analysis techniques were employed to assess the correlation between different parameters and to identify potential sources of contamination. Geographical Information System (GIS) mapping was utilized to visualize the spatial distribution of groundwater quality parameters, facilitating the identification of high-risk areas. The findings of this study provide critical insights into the current state of groundwater quality in Anantnag, Kashmir, highlighting areas that require immediate attention for remediation and management. The results can serve as a valuable reference for policymakers, water resource managers, and other stakeholders to implement appropriate measures for the protection and sustainable use of groundwater resources in the region. Additionally, this study emphasizes the importance of continuous monitoring and periodic assessments to ensure the long-term availability of safe and potable groundwater in Anantnag, Kashmir.
Downloads
References
Ellen Mac Arthur Foundation. (2015). Towards the Circular Economy: Economic and Business Rationale for an Accelerated Transition.
Geyer, R., Jambeck, J. R., & Law, K. L. (2017). Production, use, and fate of all plastics ever made. Science Advances, 3(7), e1700782.
Lieder, M., & Rashid, A. (2016). Towards circular economy implementation: A comprehensive review in context of manufacturing industry. Journal of Cleaner Production, 115, 36-51.
Niero, M., Hauschild, M. Z., & Olsen, S. I. (2014). Life cycle assessment of plastic bag production—a comparison of LDPE and biodegradable bags. Waste Management, 34(1), 95-105.
United Nations Environment Programme. (2018). Single-use plastics: A roadmap for sustainability.
World Economic Forum. (2019). The New Plastics Economy Global Commitment.
Huysman, S., Van Hulle, S. W., De Brabanter, J., & Van Langenhove, H. (2016). Life cycle assessment of chemical recycling of post-consumer polyethylene terephthalate (PET) to monomers in comparison with mechanical recycling and virgin production. Journal of Cleaner Production, 137, 762- 773.
Jambeck, J. R., Geyer, R., Wilcox, C., Siegler, T. R., Perryman, M., Andrady, A., ... & Law, K. L. (2015). Plastic waste inputs from land into the ocean. Science, 347(6223), 768-771.
European Commission. (2019). A European Strategy for Plastics in a Circular Economy.
Ghisellini, P., Cialani, C., & Ulgiati, S. (2016). A review on circular economy: The expected transition to a balanced interplay of environmental and economic systems. Journal of Cleaner Production, 114, 11-32.
Boldrin, A., & Andersen, J. K. (2010). Waste-to-energy in Denmark: A review of the current state of the art. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 14(9), 2846-2852.
Wang, Y., Zhang, J., Ma, X., & Chen, G. Q. (2019). Circular economy in China: Policies and strategies for a sustainable society. Journal of Cleaner Production, 207, 603-613.
Kirchherr, J., Reike, D., & Hekkert, M. (2017). Resources, conservation and recycling. Conceptualizing the circular economy: An analysis of 114 definitions, 127, 221-232.
Le Blanc, D. (2015). Towards a circular economy: Business rationale for an accelerated transition. Ellen MacArthur Foundation, Cowes, UK.
Bocken, N. M., Bakker, C., & Pauw, I. D. (2016). Product design and business model strategies for a circular economy. Journal of Industrial and Production Engineering, 33(5), 308- 320.