Comparative Study of the Strength Properties of the Concrete with Partial Replacement of the Coarse Aggregate with Pumice and Over Burnt Bricks
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.55524/ijirem.2023.10.1.25Keywords:
Partial Replacement, Coarse Aggregate, Pumice, Over Burnt BricksAbstract
Concrete is the universally accepted material for its adverse properties with high usage of the concrete for all type of the works in the world, it leads to depletion of natural resources like river sand, and granite. Which are the components of the concrete as fine aggregate and coarse aggregate in this project M30 grade concrete is taken in which 10%,20%&30% of coarse aggregate is replaced with over burnt bricks and 10%,20%and 30% of coarse aggregate replaced with pumice by volume. And the compressive, flexural and split tensile strength properties at 7,28& 56 days and the unit weights of the concrete compared. In order to safe guard the natural resources, alternate material like over burnt bricks, pumice considered in the present project.
Downloads
References
G.S. Patil, Mr. P.B. Autade. Effect of partial replacement of coarse aggregate by jhama class brick in concrete, IJERGS: International Journal of Engineering Research and General Science. ISSN: 2091- 2730.Volume3, Issue 4, Part-2, July-August,2015.
Fig 10: Comparison of split tensile Strength of over2. Salman Siddique, Mohd. Shadab Siddiqui, [3] burnt bricks and pumice concrete for the replacement 10% for 7, 28, 56 days
Shariq Masood Khan. Assessing the Scope of Utilizing Waste from Brick Production for Building Material. IJATES: International Journal of Advanced Technology in Engineering and Science. ISSN:2348-7550. Volume 03, Special Issue 01, May20015.
N.S. Apebo, M.B. Iorwus, J.C. Agunwamba, Comparative “Analysis of the Compressive Strength of concrete with Gravel and Crushed over Burnt Bricks as Coarse Aggregates. NJT: Nigreian Journal of Technology, ISSN 1115-8443, Volume 32, no. 1, March 2013, pp.7-12.
IS: 383-1970. Specification for coarse and Fine Aggregates from natural sources forconcrete.
IS: 10262-2009. Guidelines for concrete mix designproportioning.
IS: 456-2000. Specification for plain and reinforced Concrete.
Ahmad S.I., Roy s., (2012), ―Creep behavior and its prediction for normal strength concrete made from crushed clay brick as coarse aggregate. ‖ Journal of Material in Civil Engineering, Vol.-24, pp.308-314.
“Effects of Different Mineral Admixtures on the Properties of Fresh Concrete”. SadaqatUllahKhan, Muhammad Fadhil Nuruddin, Tehmina Ayub, and Nasir Shafiq“ The Scientific WorldJournal”2014.
B.Vamsi Krishna et al., “A Study on the mechanical properties of light weight concrete by replacing coarse aggregate with (pumice) and cement with (fly ash)” IJERT, ISSN: 2278-0181,[Vol.4, Issue 8, August-2015 Pg. No (331- 336)].
Lakshmi Kumar Minapu et al., “Experimental Study on Light Weight Aggregate Concrete with Pumice Stone, Silica Fume and Fly Ash as a Partial Replacement of Coarse Aggregate.” IJIRSET, ISSN: 2319-8753, [Vol. 3, Issue 12, December 2014].
Geoffrey, et al., “Properties of Pumice Lightweight Aggregate” IISTE, ISSN 2222-1719 (Paper) ISSN 2222- 2863 (Online) [ Vol 2, No.10,2012].
N. Shivalinga Rao, Y.Radha Ratna Kumari, V. Bhaskar Desai, B.L.P. Swami “Fibre Reinforced Light Weight Aggregate (Natural Pumice Stone) Concrete” International Journal of Scientific & Engineering Research, ISSN 2229- 5518Volume 4, Issue 5,May-2013]
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
How to Cite
