Revisiting the Early Discourse of the Information Age and Its Interplay with Humanity
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.55524/ijirem.2023.10.1.16Keywords:
Ellul, Galbraith, Machlup, Mumford, PoratAbstract
This paper examines scholars’ discourses on the coming of the Information Age. It starts by discussing scholars who measured the emergence of the Information Age in the early 1960s. Machlup and Galbraith used economic indicators, followed by the exploration of network and knowledge sharing, which is a crucial process in the formation of the Information Age. Ellul (1964) paralleled humanity with technology as a “system,” and Mumford (1966) coined the term “megamachine.” These early arguments were pessimistic that humans were considered as inevitably confined by uncontrolled structures due to information and its byproducts—technology. However, in the 1980s, Nora and Minc considered the Information Age optimistically by introducing the concept of “Decentralization” to indicate the freedom of “choices” for modern people.
Downloads
References
Achterhuis,H. (2002) Borgmann, Technology and the.Good Life? and the Empirical Turn for Philosophy of Technology. Techne’, 6:1.
Bell, D. (1973). The Coming of Post-Industrial Society:Venture in Social Forecasting,New York: Basic Books
Beniger, J. R. (1988) Information society and global science. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, Vol.495, Telescience: Scientific Communication in the Information Age.
Beniger, J. R. (1988) The Control Revolution: Technical and Economic Origins of the Information Society .MA: Harvard University Press
Castells,M.(1996) The Rise of the Network Society, The Information Age: Economy, Society and Culture, Vol. I. Cambridge, MA; Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
Dolfsma, W. (2001) Metaphors of knowledge in. economics, Review of Social Economy,59(1): 71-91
Drucker, P.F. (1969) The Age of Discontinuity: Guidelines to Our Changing Society, London: Heinemann.
Ellul, J(1964) The Technological Society. New York:Vintage. [9] Evers, H.D. (2000) Globalization, Local Knowledge, and the Growth of Ignorance: The Epistemic. Construction of
Reality. Southeast Asian Journal of Social Science,28(1): 13- 22.
Foucault,M. (1977) Discipline and Punish: The Birth of the Prison. New York: Vintage.
Fromm, E. (1950) Psychoanalysis and Religion New. Haven. CT: Yale Univ. Press.
Galbraith, J.K.(1967) The New Industrial State. MA: Houghton Mifflin.
Goffman, E. (1956) The Presentation of Self in. Everyday Life. Edinburgh: University of Edinburgh.
Kogut, B. (2000) The network as knowledge: Generative rules and the emergence of structure. Strategic Management Journal, 21: 405-425.
Machlup, F. (1962) The Production and Distribution of. Knowledge in the United States.NJ: Princeton University Press.
Mulgan G.J., (1991). Communication and Control, Polity Press.
Mumford, L. (1966) Technics and the Nature of Man. Technology and Culture,7:303.
Nora, S., and Minc A.(1980) The computerization of. society: A report to the President of France. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Porat, M.U. (1977) The Information Economy: Definition and Measurement. US Department of Commerce, Washington, DC, Vol. I.
Stanback, T.M. and Noyelle, T. (1990) Productivity in. services: a valid measure of economic performance? in Noyelle, T. (eds), Skills, Wages, and Productivity in the Service Sector. CO: Westview Press.
Swer, G. M. (2004) Technics and (para)praxis: the. Freudian dimensions of Lewis Mumford’s theories of technology. History of the Human Sciences 17:4.
UNESCO. ( 2005 ) Towards Knowledge Societies: UNESCO World Report. Paris:UNESCO.
Webster, F. and Robins, K. (1986) Information. technology: A Luddite analysis. New Jersey: Norwood
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
How to Cite
