Analysis of Tall Building with Different Lateral Force Resisting System
Keywords:
Conventional, Shear-wall, Truss-belt, Outrigger, Diagrid, Viscous damper, Response spectrum, ETABSAbstract
In the current circumstance, the populace is expanding rapidly, thus, the urban areas are becoming wide by devouring farming and green space and the land esteem is expanding. Another point is the tall vertical structure speaks to the country. As it builds the notoriety of the nation. To keep away from this the structures began developing vertical and thin as it arrives at a specific height the wind force governs the building as the main load more than gravity load, as the building grows higher the stability reduces. Due to a lack of design to face wind loads, as the cross-section decreases the stability reduces. And these structures are more prone to earthquakes and wind. Therefore, much research is proceeding to balance out the structure from an increasingly affordable perspective. To know the best performance and economical for the lateral force-resisting system of different types of 30 story buildings are modelled in ETABS, assuming the site location as BHUJ Gujarat, India. For the different structural systems that are compared for minimum story displacement and minimum story drift, these are the qualities that characterize the human comforts for the structure. the structural system used is conventional, shear wall, truss belt, outrigger, diagrid, and fluid viscous damper are used to compare the best performance of the structure. Above all diagrid and viscous damper shows the less displacement and drift values when compared to others but from the economic point of view viscous damper gives the best result from all the above.
Downloads
References
Ali. Mir M & Kyoung Sun Moon,2007. Structural developments in tall buildings: current trends and feature prospects. Architectural science review, vol 50.3, p 205-223.
Alam,2017. Innovative Structural Concept & Solution for Mega Tall Buildings Applied to One Kilometer Skyscraper, Open Access Library Inc.Vol 4,e3459.
Chandrasekar, Karthikeyan. K, Thangakathiravan.T,G.A.,P.R.,2015. Planning and Structural Analysis of Trophy Shape Skyscraper, vol 0, Issue 03.
CTBUH Council on Tall Buildings and Urban Habitat (2016), https://www.ctbuh.org/resource/height. [5] Skyscraper Center, (2016). http://www.skyscrapercenter.com/building/capital-gate -tower/3172.
Raju and Readdy, S.R, 2019. Dynamic analysis of regular and irregular high-rise buildings under the influence of shear walls by using ETABS. Journal of applied science and computations, vol 6 issue 2.440-448.
Bhavsar, Rathva, S.B, D.P, 2019. Optimization of G+7 Storeyed Rcc Building with Different Positioning of Shear wall. International journal of advanced engineering and research development 6, Special Issue 01.
Kala,L., Mangulkar. M, and Jain. I, 2017. The use of outrigger and belt truss systems for high rise buildings. International Journal of Civil Engineering and Technology, vol 8, issue 7.
Khanorkar.A.A, Mr. S. V. Denge ,2016. Belt Truss as Lateral Load Resisting StructuralSystem for Tall Building: A review.Global Research and Development Journal for Engineering, vol 2, Issue 10.
Tavakoli,Kamgar.R, R .R,2019. Seismic performance of outrigger–belt truss system considering soil-structure interaction, international journal of advanced structural engineering
(https://doi.org/10.1007/s40091-019-0215-7). [11] Ganatra.V.P, Jhummarwala.R.A, Dr. Parikh.K.B.,2017. Study on Behaviour of Outrigger System on High Rise Structure by Varying Outrigger Depth,.International Journal for Research in Applied Science & Engineering Technology, Vol 5, issue 9., pp:1-16
Shah, Gore .N.G.,2016. Review on Behavior of Outrigger System in High Rise Building. International Research Journal of Engineering and Technology, vol 03, Issue 06.
Somvanshi,T.R, Kolase,P.K, V. R. R,2019. Comparative analysis and design of diagrid structure and orthogonal structure. International Journal of Engineering Development and Research. vol 7, issue 3, pp. 2007-18.
Moon (2016), Diagrid System for Structural design of complex-Shaped Tall Building.The Twelfth East Asia-Pacific Conference on Structural Engineering and Construction. Vol 5, No 4, 243-250.
Kachchhi.M. J, S.V.M, V.B.P,2019. Comparative study of Diagrid structure with other structural systems for tall buildings. Global journal of engineering science and researches. ISSN 2348-8034.
Lee, U.S, and Shin,2010. Optimized Topology Extraction of Steel-Framed DiaGrid Structure for Tall Buildings. International Journal of Steel Structures, Vol 10, No 2,157-164.
Cetin, Aydin.E., Ozturk.B.,2019., Optimal Design and Distribution of Viscous Dampers for Shear Building Structures Under Seismic Excitations. Journal frontiers in Built Environment, Vol 5, Article 90.
Infanti, Robinson.J.,Smith.R., 2008. Viscous Dampers for High-Rise Buildings.The 14th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering.
Nanduri.R.K., Suresh.B, Hussain.I., 2013. Optimum Position of Outrigger System for High-Rise Reinforced Concrete Buildings Under Wind and Earthquake Loadings. American Journal of Engineering Research, vol 02, Issue 08.pp-76-89.
Parekh, Dhandha.K.J,2016. Study on position of outrigger system in tall structure. Journal of Emerging Technologies and Innovative Research, vol 03, Issue 05.
Milana, Olmati.P, K. G, F. B,2015. Ultimate Capacity of Diagrid System for Tall Buildings in Nominal Configuration and Damaged State. RPeriodica Polytechnica Civil Engineering 59(3),pp.381-391.
Szolomicki.J, Szolomicki.G.H, 2017.Application of the diagrid system in modern high rise buildings. International Journal of Advances in Science Engineering and Technology,volume-5, issue-3.
