Study of Challenges, Impact and Solutions in Sustainable Project Management for Green Construction
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.55524/Keywords:
Green Building, Construction, Schedule, Performance, SustainabilityAbstract
In recent years, India has seen an explosion in the environmentally conscious construction industry. Despite the widespread call for greener buildings to reduce their environmental impact, studies evaluating their effectiveness are quite uncommon. Therefore, the purpose of this research is to examine how well green building construction projects stick to their timelines, and to make suggestions that could boost that performance. This study reports the views of construction experts on the incorporation of sustainable construction in project administration in Jammu and Kashmir. In total, data were collected from 122 construction professionals who were randomly selected through the survey. In different categories, land, water, waste, energy, human resources and physical resources are used. The study revealed that the ideas of the success of the project if it works within the three objectives (time, cost and quality) influence construction professionals to underestimate the involvement of sustainability benefits (environmental, economic and social) in terms of the process used to measure the project's project. success. However, most of the buildings in Jammu and Kashmir are very energy dependent, increasing energy wastage and reducing the comfort of residents. The result also showed that recycled construction materials are not fully used in buildings, and this is due to their unavailability in the industry, the unsustainable price of the product and the lack of incentives for the use of such materials. The study concludes that, the challenge facing the construction industry today is not only to complete projects on time, cost and quality, but to combine various constraints such as economic, environmental and social needs in the construction work. Finally, a set of proposals was presented with the aim of improving the effectiveness of the program. The findings of this study will provide a countermeasure which future green building construction initiatives may be evaluated.
Downloads
References
McLennan, J. F. _2004_. “The philosophy of sustainable design, Ecotone,LLC, Kansas City, Mo.
Tagaza and Wilson (2004).Causes of delay in large building construction projects, Journal of Management in Engineering 11(2): 45–50. http://dx.doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0742- 597X(1995)11:2(45)
Zhang et al., 2011 “Prediction and optimization of life-cycle costsin early design.”Build. Res. Inf., 28_5/6_, 376–386 [4] Hwang and Tan, 2010.Examining the business impact of owner commitment to sustainability, Journal of Construction Engineering and Management 132(4): 384– 92.http://dx.doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-
(2006)132:4(384)
Zhang et al., 2011. The significant factors causing delay of building construction projects in Malaysia, Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management 14(2): 192–206. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/09699980710731308
Hwang and Tan, 2010.Examining the business impact of owner commitment to sustainability, Journal of Construction Engineering and Management 132(4): 384– 92.http://dx.doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-
(2006)132:4(384)
Pettersen, 1999; Ling, 2003.Contracts and the legal environment for engineersand architects, 6th Ed., McGraw Hill, New York
Eisenberg et al. (2002)_. “White paper on sustainability.”Build. Des. Constr.,1, 1–48.
McGraw-Hill Construction._2006_.Green building smart market report:Design& construction intelligence, New York. [10] Reed, W., and Gordon, E. _2000_. “Integrated design and building process:What research and methodologies are needed?” Build. Res. Inf.,28_5/6_, 325–337.
Sappe, R. _2007_.“Project management solutions for building owners anddevelopers.”Buildings, 101_4_, 22–22.
United Nations Environment Programme _UNEP_._2007_. “Buildingsand climate change: Status, challenges and opportunities.” _http://www.unep.org_ _June 1, 2007_.
Acuff, Z., Harris, A., Larissa, L., Beyan, M.,and Allyson, P. (2005) Building Green for the Future: Case Studies of Sustainable Development in Michigan.
William M and Partners (2000).“The Hannover Principles, Design for Sustainability”.Expo 2000.The World’s Fair, Hannover. Germany.
Lenssen, N. and Roodman, D. M., (1995) Making better buildings. In world watch Institute (ed.) of the world 1995, Norton, New York.
Kish, L. (1965) “Survey Sampling”. New York: John Wiley and Sons, Inc.
Abdul-mohsen Al-Hammad and SadiAssaf (1996).“Assessment of Work Performance of Maintenance Contractors in Saudi Arabia”.Journal of Management in Engineering.
Wong, F.W. H.;¦De Saram, D. Darshi;¦L. P. T. I. and Chan, D. W. M. (2006) A Compendium of Buildability Issues from the Viewpoints of Construction Practitioners, Architectural Science Review, 49 (1), 81-90.
Anink, D., Boodtra, C. and Mark, J. (1996) Handbook of Sustainable Development. London: James and James.
Assaf et al. 1995_.The cost & benefit of achieving green buildings,Davis Langdon and Seah International, Sydney, Australia.
Alaghbariet al. (2007)_. “Cities take on environment as debatedrags at federal level.” The Washington Post, _http://www.washingtonpost.com_ _June 15, 2007_.Johnson, J. _2007a_. “It’s green, and it’s building.” Waste News, 12_26_,1–21.
Nofera, Korkmaz 2010_. “Why certify? Consultant points to multiple benefits.”Waste News, 12_26_, 12–12.
Smith 2003_.Sustainable construction: Green building design anddelivery, Wiley, Hoboken, N.J.
Magent et al. 2009; Korkmaz et al. 2010b _. “Costing green: A comprehensivecost database and budgeting methodology.” Davis
Langdon,_http://www.davislangdon.com/USA/Projects/Costi ngGreen/_ _May19, 2007_.
Beheiry et al. 2006; Lapinski et al. 2006_. “The charrette as an agent for change.” New urbanism:Comprehensive report & best practices guide, 3rd Ed., NewUrban Publications, Ithaca, N.Y., 12-2-8.
National Association of Homebuilders._2006_.“Model green homebuildingguidelines.”_http://www.nahb.org/publication_ details.aspx?publicationID_1994§ionID_155_ _June 25, 2007_.