Potential of Soil Stabilization Using Ground Granulated Blast Furnace Slag (GGBS)
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.55524/Keywords:
Compressive Strength, GGBS, Organic Soft Soil, Strength, StabilizationAbstract
Natural delicate soil also known as organic soft soil (OSS) has extensive negative geotechnical properties, for example, high water content, low shear strength, high natural matter, and low bearing limit and thus a critical cutting off high compressibility happens that makes it as one of the most troublesome soils for building structures over its normal state. As a result of these geotechnical issues of natural delicate soil, improvement instrument is so fundamental when the natural delicate soil exists to manage it as a dirt establishment. In this review, the physical and mechanical properties of the natural delicate soil are talked about. This principal objective of this study is to work on the strength of natural delicate soil by adding modern waste as a filler and concrete as a folio. Natural delicate soil are known to have a frail strength and an exceptionally high settlement issue. Notwithstanding, past explores have demonstrated the way that the strength of natural delicate soil could be improved by utilizing soil adjustment strategy. In this review, Soil adjustment has turned into the significant issue in development designing and the explores in regards to the viability of involving modern squanders as a stabilizer are quickly expanding. This concentrate momentarily depicts the reasonableness of the GGBS to be utilized in the nearby development industry in a method for limiting how much waste to be arranged to the climate causing natural contamination. A few structural designing lab tests are led to review the geotechnical properties of GGBS and strength gain when blended in with nearby mud test. An alternate extent of GGBS and soil test restored for 7 days brings about a strength gain. A superior comprehension of the properties of GGBS is acquired from the review and the tests demonstrates a superior strength and better properties of delicate soil test when settled. The impact of GGBS on the physical and geotechnical qualities of the dirt, for example, Atterberg limits, compaction boundaries (most extreme dry thickness (MMD) and ideal dampness content (OMC)) and soil strength (unconfined compressive strength (UCS)) has been researched. GGBS was included different rates (3, 6, 9 and 12%). Improvement levels were demonstrated by UCS testing did on examples following 7 days of relieving.
Downloads
References
Abubakar, A. U. & Baharudin, K. S. (2012). Potential Use of Malaysian Thermal Power Plants Coal Bottom Ash in Construction. International Journal of Sustainable Construction Engineering & Technology, 3(2).
Adon, R., Bakar, I., Wijeyesekara, D. C., & Zainorabidin, A. (2012). Overview of the Sustainable Uses of Organic soft soil in Malaysia with Some Relevant Geotechnical Assessments. International Journal of Intergrated Engineering, 4(3), 38-46.
Alam, T., (n.d.). Properties of Good Sand. Retrieved from https://civiltoday.com/civil- engineering-materials/sand/327-
properties-of-good-sand
Andriesse, J. P. (1988). Nature and Management of Tropical Organic soft soils. First edition, Food & Agriculture Organisation (FAO), Rome, 29-38.
Akinmusuru, J.O. (1990). Potential beneficial use of steel slag waste for civil engineering purposes. Resources conservation and recycling. Vol 5. PT1. Pp 73-80.
Al-Tabbaa, A., 2003. Soilmixing in the UK 1991–2001: state of practice report. Ground Improvement.7 (3), 117–126. [7] Bell, F.G. (1992) Engineering Properties of Soils and Rocks. Great Britain: Butterworth Heinemann.
British Standard (1990) BS 1377-2:1990 Methods of test for soils for civil engineering purposes - Part 2: Classification tests. London: UK: British Standard Institution.
British Standard, (1998) BS 1377-4-7:1990. Method of Test for Soils for Civil Engineering Purposes. London, UK: British Standard Institution.
European Committee for Standardization, (2014) BS EN 17892-1-4. Geotechnical Investigation and Testing - Laboratory Testing of Soil, London, UK: British Standard Institution.
Farouk, A., and Shahien, M. (2013) Ground Improvement Using Soil-Cement Columns: Experimental Investigation. Alexandria Engineering Journal, 52, pp. 733-740.
Goodarzi. A.R, Salimi. M. 2015. Stabilization treatment of a dispersive clayey soil using granulated blast furnace slag and basic oxygen furnace slag. Applied Clay Science, 108. PP 61- 69.
Higgins, D.D., 2005. Soil Stabilisation With Ground
Granulated Blast furnace Slag. UK Cementitious Slag Makers Association Report, Oxted.
Jafer, H., Atherton, W. and Ruddock, F. (2015) Soft Soil Stabilisation Using High Calcium Waste Material Fly Ash. Proceeding 12th International Post-Graduate Research Conference 2015 Media City UK. 10-12 June, V.22 (1) pp.147-157
Kitazume, M., and Terashi, M. 2013. The deep mixing method. CRC Press/ Balkema, Leiden, the Netherlands. [16] Kazemian, S., Asadi, A., Huat, B. K. K., Prasad, A., Rahim,
I. B. A. (2009). Settlement Problems in Peat Due to Their High Compressibility and Possible Solution Using Cement Columns. Forensic Engineering Congress 2009.
Kifli, A. Z., Zainorabidin, A., Mohd, S., Masirin, M. I. M. (2016). Physical Properties of Peat in Sibu, Sarawak. Proceedings of Soft Soils 2016, September 27-28th 2016
Kumar, N. and Kazal, S.S. (2015) Improvement of a Sub Grade Strength by Lime & Rice Husk. International Journal of Engineering, Management, Humanities and Social Sciences Paradigms (IJEMHS), V.14 (1), PP.1-5.
Leete, R. (2006). Malaysia’s Peat Swamp Forests: Conservation and Sustainable Use. Kuala Lumpur: United Nations Development Programme (UNDP) Malaysia.
Makusa, G.p. (2012) Soil stabilization methods and materials in Engineering Practice. Department of Civil, Environmental and Natural Resources Engineering. [Online] Sweden: Luleå University of Technology available at: https://www.divaportal.org/smash/get/diva2:997144/FULLT
EXT01.pdf