Study of Optimum Mix Design of Light-Weight Self Compaction Concrete
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.55524/ijircst.2023.11.4.9Keywords:
Nano Silica, Pumice Light Weight Aggregate, Slump Test, Compression Test, Flexural Test Split Tensile TestAbstract
The tremendous growth in population, globalization and industrialization have led to the development of the construction sectors. The construction sector contributes a majorly to the development of the country based on its infrastructural needs. Also, concrete turns out to be the best and greatest construction building material in the global scenario. Concrete has become a highly sort out construction material because it could be cast in-situ and precast satisfying the construction feasibilities. The concrete is bifurcated into special types of concrete for decades. One such special type includes Self-Compacting Concrete (SCC). SCC has gained high priority among other types of special concrete. SCC has got a unique superior property of easy flowing nature. The greatest credit of using SCC is that it is user-friendly because it does not require compaction, consumes less time, and provides a smooth surface and textured finish. It does not require skilled labour. These advantages have scored and drawn the attention of the construction sector. Nowadays, most of the ready-mix plants use SCC to serve their building. The findings from the current investigation are summarized below. The workability of concrete increase with the increase in the variation in the partially replacement of cement with nano silica and Coarse aggregate with the pumice light weight aggregate. The maximum compressive strength of M40 grade for 7 days of all the mixed combinations is found to be 38.88 N/mm2 when coarse aggregate was replaced with 36% by pumice light weight aggregate and binder i.e., cement with 0.8% by nano silica.The maximum compressive strength M40 grade of concrete for 28 days of all the mixed combinations is found to be 54.42 N/mm2 when coarse aggregate was replaced with 36% by pumice light weight aggregate and binder i.e., cement with 1.6% by nano silica. The maximum split tensile strength M40 grade for 7 days of all the mixed combinations is found to be 3.46 N/mm2 when coarse aggregate was replaced with 36% by pumice light weight aggregate and binder i.e., cement with 0.8% by nano silica. The maximum split tensile strength M40 grade for 28 days of all the mixed combinations is found to be 5.85N/mm2 when coarse aggregate was replaced with 36% by pumice light weight aggregate and binder i.e., cement with 1.2 % by nano silica respectively. The maximum flexural strength M40 grade for 7 days and 28 days of all the mixed combinations is found to be 6.78 N/mm2& 9.24 N/mm2 respectively. when coarse aggregate was replaced with 36% by pumice light weight aggregate and cement with 1.6 % by nano silica respectively. By using of waste materials such as pumice light weight aggregate and nano silica in concrete the structure becomes light weight and economical and environment can be also protected for pollution etc.
Downloads
References
Siddique, R., Properties of self-compacting concrete containing class F fly ash, Journal of Materials and Design, Vol. 32, 1501-1507 pp., 2011.
Japan Society of Civil Engineers, ―Recommendation for Construction of Self Compacting Concrete,157- 164 pp., 1998.
IS: 12089 (Specification for Granulated Slag for Manufacture of Portland Slag Cement), Indian Standard Code of Practice, 1987.
Nan Su., Kung-Chung Hsu., and His-Wen Chai., ―A simple mix design method for self compacting concrete, Journal of Cement Concrete Research Vol. 31, No. 12, 1799-1807 pp., Dec. 2001.
Dinakar, P., Kali, P.S., Umesh, C.S., ―Design of self compacting concrete with ground granulated blast furnace slag, Journal of Material and Design, Vol. 43, 161–169 pp., Jan 2013.
IS: 12269 (53 Grade Ordinary Portland cement Specifications), Indian Standard Code, 1987.
IS: 383 (Specification for coarse and fine aggregates from natural sources for concrete), Indian Standard Code of Practice, 1970.
IS: 10262 (Concrete Mix Proportioning- Guidelines), Indian Standard Code, 2009.
Khayat, K.H., Hu, C., Monty, H., ―Stability of SCC, advantages and Potential applications‖, In: Proceedings of RILEM international conference on self-compacting concrete, Rilem Publications SARL, 143-152 pp., 1999
Pai .B.H.V, Nandy M., K.H, Sarkar.P.K, Ganapathy.C.P, - Experimental study on selfm compacting concrete containing industrial by-products, European Scientific Journal, vol12, ISSN 1875-7881, April, 2014.
Koehler, E. P., and D. W. Fowler (2007) Aggregates in Self Consolidating Concrete. Research report 108-2F, International Centre for Aggregates Research, The University of Texas, Austin.n 92.
Kumar, P., M. A. Haq, and S. K. Kaushik (2004) Early age strength of SCC with large volumes of fly ash, Indian Concrete Journal, 78, 25 – 29.
Lachemi, M., K. M. A. Hossain, V. Lambros, and N. Bouzoubaa (2003) Development of cost effective self consolidating concrete incorporating fly-ash, slag cement, or viscosity-modifying admixtures. ACI Materials Journal, 100, 419 - 425.
Lachemi, M., K. M. A. Hossain, V. Lambros, P. C. Nkinamubanzi, and N. Bouzoubaa (2004a) Performance of new viscosity modifying admixtures in enhancing the rheological properties of cement paste. Cement and Concrete Research, 34, 185 - 193.
Lachemi, M., K. M. A. Hossain, V. Lambros, P. C. Nkinamubanzi, and N. Bouzoubaa (2004b). Self Consolidating Concrete incorporating new viscosity modifying admixtures. Cement and Concrete Research, 34, 917 - 926.
Indian Standard 10262: 2009, Concrete Mix Proportioning: Guidelines.
Indian Standard 1199: 1959, Methods of Sampling and Analysis of Concrete.
Indian Standard 516: 1959, Methods of tests for Strength of Concrete.
IS: 10262-1982, Recommended Guidelines for Concrete Mix Design, Bureau of Indian
IS: 383-1970, Specification of Course and Fine Aggregate from Natural Sources for
IS: 456-2000, Code of practice for plain and reinforced cement concrete, Bureau of Indian Standards, New Delhi, India.
Nagaratnam, B. H., Rahman, M. E., Mirasa, A. K., Mannan, M. A., & Lame, S. O. (2016). Workability and heat of
hydration of self-compacting concrete incorporating agro industrial waste. Journal of Cleaner Production, 112, 882- 894. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.05.112.
Okafor, F. O. (1988). Palm kernel shell as a lightweight aggregate for concrete. Cement and Concrete Research, 18(6), 901-910.
Okamura, H., &Ouchi, M. (2003). Self-compacting concrete. Journal of advanced concrete technology, 1(1), 5- 15.
Okpala, D. (1990). Palm kernel shell as a lightweight aggregate in concrete. Building and environment, 25(4), 291-296.
Rahman, M., Muntohar, A., Pakrashi, V., Nagaratnam, B., &Sujan, D. (2014). Self compacting concrete from uncontrolled burning of rice husk and blended fine aggregate. Materials & Design, 55, 410-415.
Shafigh, P., Jumaat, M. Z., & Mahmud, H. (2010). Mix design and mechanical properties of oil palm shell lightweight aggregate concrete: a review. International journal of the physical sciences, 5(14), 2127-2134.
Shafigh, P., Jumaat, M. Z., & Mahmud, H. (2011). Oil palm shell as a lightweight aggregate for production high strength lightweight concrete. Construction and Building Materials, 25(4), 1848-1853.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
How to Cite
