Study of Optimum Mix Design of Light-Weight Self Compaction Concrete

Authors

  • Faizan Rasool Dar M. Tech Scholar, Department of Civil Engineering, RIMT University, Mandi Gobindgarh, Punjab, India Author
  • Brahamjeet Singh Assistant Professor, Department of Civil Engineering, RIMT University, Mandi Gobindgarh, Punjab, India Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.55524/ijircst.2023.11.4.9

Keywords:

Nano Silica, Pumice Light Weight Aggregate, Slump Test, Compression Test, Flexural Test Split Tensile Test

Abstract

The tremendous growth in population,  globalization and industrialization have led to the  development of the construction sectors. The construction  sector contributes a majorly to the development of the  country based on its infrastructural needs. Also, concrete  turns out to be the best and greatest construction building  material in the global scenario. Concrete has become a  highly sort out construction material because it could be  cast in-situ and precast satisfying the construction  feasibilities. The concrete is bifurcated into special types  of concrete for decades. One such special type includes  Self-Compacting Concrete (SCC). SCC has gained high  priority among other types of special concrete. SCC has  got a unique superior property of easy flowing nature.  The greatest credit of using SCC is that it is user-friendly  because it does not require compaction, consumes less  time, and provides a smooth surface and textured finish.  It does not require skilled labour. These advantages have  scored and drawn the attention of the construction sector.  Nowadays, most of the ready-mix plants use SCC to  serve their building. The findings from the current  investigation are summarized below. The workability of  concrete increase with the increase in the variation in the  partially replacement of cement with nano silica and  Coarse aggregate with the pumice light weight aggregate. The maximum compressive strength of M40 grade for 7  days of all the mixed combinations is found to be 38.88  N/mm2 when coarse aggregate was replaced with 36% by  pumice light weight aggregate and binder i.e., cement  with 0.8% by nano silica.The maximum compressive  strength M40 grade of concrete for 28 days of all the  mixed combinations is found to be 54.42 N/mm2 when  coarse aggregate was replaced with 36% by pumice light  weight aggregate and binder i.e., cement with 1.6% by  nano silica. The maximum split tensile strength M40 grade for 7 days of all the mixed combinations is found to  be 3.46 N/mm2 when coarse aggregate was replaced with  36% by pumice light weight aggregate and binder i.e.,  cement with 0.8% by nano silica. The maximum split  tensile strength M40 grade for 28 days of all the mixed  combinations is found to be 5.85N/mm2 when coarse  aggregate was replaced with 36% by pumice light weight  aggregate and binder i.e., cement with 1.2 % by nano  silica respectively. The maximum flexural strength M40  grade for 7 days and 28 days of all the mixed  combinations is found to be 6.78 N/mm2& 9.24 N/mm2 respectively. when coarse aggregate was replaced with  36% by pumice light weight aggregate and cement with  1.6 % by nano silica respectively. By using of waste  materials such as pumice light weight aggregate and nano  silica in concrete the structure becomes light weight and  economical and environment can be also protected for  pollution etc.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Siddique, R., Properties of self-compacting concrete containing class F fly ash, Journal of Materials and Design, Vol. 32, 1501-1507 pp., 2011.

Japan Society of Civil Engineers, ―Recommendation for Construction of Self Compacting Concrete,157- 164 pp., 1998.

IS: 12089 (Specification for Granulated Slag for Manufacture of Portland Slag Cement), Indian Standard Code of Practice, 1987.

Nan Su., Kung-Chung Hsu., and His-Wen Chai., ―A simple mix design method for self compacting concrete, Journal of Cement Concrete Research Vol. 31, No. 12, 1799-1807 pp., Dec. 2001.

Dinakar, P., Kali, P.S., Umesh, C.S., ―Design of self compacting concrete with ground granulated blast furnace slag, Journal of Material and Design, Vol. 43, 161–169 pp., Jan 2013.

IS: 12269 (53 Grade Ordinary Portland cement Specifications), Indian Standard Code, 1987.

IS: 383 (Specification for coarse and fine aggregates from natural sources for concrete), Indian Standard Code of Practice, 1970.

IS: 10262 (Concrete Mix Proportioning- Guidelines), Indian Standard Code, 2009.

Khayat, K.H., Hu, C., Monty, H., ―Stability of SCC, advantages and Potential applications‖, In: Proceedings of RILEM international conference on self-compacting concrete, Rilem Publications SARL, 143-152 pp., 1999

Pai .B.H.V, Nandy M., K.H, Sarkar.P.K, Ganapathy.C.P, - Experimental study on selfm compacting concrete containing industrial by-products, European Scientific Journal, vol12, ISSN 1875-7881, April, 2014.

Koehler, E. P., and D. W. Fowler (2007) Aggregates in Self Consolidating Concrete. Research report 108-2F, International Centre for Aggregates Research, The University of Texas, Austin.n 92.

Kumar, P., M. A. Haq, and S. K. Kaushik (2004) Early age strength of SCC with large volumes of fly ash, Indian Concrete Journal, 78, 25 – 29.

Lachemi, M., K. M. A. Hossain, V. Lambros, and N. Bouzoubaa (2003) Development of cost effective self consolidating concrete incorporating fly-ash, slag cement, or viscosity-modifying admixtures. ACI Materials Journal, 100, 419 - 425.

Lachemi, M., K. M. A. Hossain, V. Lambros, P. C. Nkinamubanzi, and N. Bouzoubaa (2004a) Performance of new viscosity modifying admixtures in enhancing the rheological properties of cement paste. Cement and Concrete Research, 34, 185 - 193.

Lachemi, M., K. M. A. Hossain, V. Lambros, P. C. Nkinamubanzi, and N. Bouzoubaa (2004b). Self Consolidating Concrete incorporating new viscosity modifying admixtures. Cement and Concrete Research, 34, 917 - 926.

Indian Standard 10262: 2009, Concrete Mix Proportioning: Guidelines.

Indian Standard 1199: 1959, Methods of Sampling and Analysis of Concrete.

Indian Standard 516: 1959, Methods of tests for Strength of Concrete.

IS: 10262-1982, Recommended Guidelines for Concrete Mix Design, Bureau of Indian

IS: 383-1970, Specification of Course and Fine Aggregate from Natural Sources for

IS: 456-2000, Code of practice for plain and reinforced cement concrete, Bureau of Indian Standards, New Delhi, India.

Nagaratnam, B. H., Rahman, M. E., Mirasa, A. K., Mannan, M. A., & Lame, S. O. (2016). Workability and heat of

hydration of self-compacting concrete incorporating agro industrial waste. Journal of Cleaner Production, 112, 882- 894. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.05.112.

Okafor, F. O. (1988). Palm kernel shell as a lightweight aggregate for concrete. Cement and Concrete Research, 18(6), 901-910.

Okamura, H., &Ouchi, M. (2003). Self-compacting concrete. Journal of advanced concrete technology, 1(1), 5- 15.

Okpala, D. (1990). Palm kernel shell as a lightweight aggregate in concrete. Building and environment, 25(4), 291-296.

Rahman, M., Muntohar, A., Pakrashi, V., Nagaratnam, B., &Sujan, D. (2014). Self compacting concrete from uncontrolled burning of rice husk and blended fine aggregate. Materials & Design, 55, 410-415.

Shafigh, P., Jumaat, M. Z., & Mahmud, H. (2010). Mix design and mechanical properties of oil palm shell lightweight aggregate concrete: a review. International journal of the physical sciences, 5(14), 2127-2134.

Shafigh, P., Jumaat, M. Z., & Mahmud, H. (2011). Oil palm shell as a lightweight aggregate for production high strength lightweight concrete. Construction and Building Materials, 25(4), 1848-1853.

Downloads

Published

2023-07-30

How to Cite

Study of Optimum Mix Design of Light-Weight Self Compaction Concrete . (2023). International Journal of Innovative Research in Computer Science & Technology, 11(4), 48–56. https://doi.org/10.55524/ijircst.2023.11.4.9