Enhancing Effectiveness of Farm School through Community Wall Magazine (CWM): A Field Experimental Study

Authors

  • Netrapal Malik Scientist, Agricultural Extension, KVK (CSAUA&T, Kanpur), Aligarh-202122, Uttar Pradesh, India
  • Shantanu Kumar Dubey Director, ICAR-ATARI, Kanpur-208002, Uttar Pradesh, India

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.48165/IJEE.2023.59214

Keywords:

Community wall magazine, Farm schools, Agricultural Technology Management Agency (ATMA), Participatory communication, Development communication

Abstract

A field experimental study was conducted in Aligarh District of Uttar Pradesh to assess the feasibility of enhancing the effectiveness of Farm Schools (FS) through Community Wall Magazine (CWM). Four treatments with two replications were taken in the study. Treatments were information sharing through CWM (T1), information sharing through FS (T2) and supporting information sharing through FS with CWM (T3). Treatment T0 was taken to eliminate the effect of extraneous variables. Before and after treatment score of gain in the knowledge level of farmers regarding paddy cultivation practices was measured with the help of a knowledge test developed for the study. Matching in terms of the general profile of the farmers under all the replications was ensured before exposure to the treatments. Total farmers under the study were 200. Through CWM 21.83 per cent enhancement in knowledge level regarding rice cultivation practices of the farmers was observed. Due to the effect of FS on rice, 47.18 per cent enhancement in knowledge level was observed. The FS on rice which were supported with the information sharing through CWM 61.02 per cent enhancement in the knowledge level of beneficiary farmers was observed. 

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Directorate of Extension. (2018). Guidelines for Support to State Extension Programmes for Extension Reforms (ATMA) Scheme. Department of Agriculture, Cooperation & Farmers Welfare, Ministry of Agriculture & Farmers Welfare, Government of India, Krishi Bhawan, New Delhi.

Dominic, D. M., Meena, H. R., & Niranjan, D. A. (2023). Effectiveness of an educational module on diet and nutrition: A farm women perspective from aspirational districts. Indian Journal of Extension Education, 59(1), 8-31.

FAO. (2006). World Congress on Communication for Development, Rome, 2006.

FAO. (2011). Communication for Development: Meeting Today’s Agriculture and Rural Development Challenges Background Paper, FAO Expert Consultation on Communication for Rural Development Rome, Italy, 14-16 September 2011.

Khisa, G. (2004). Training Guide on the Farmers Field School Methodology: Approach and Procedure, IPPM-FFS Programme FAO, Kenya.

Lin, C. I. (2022). Emergence of perceptions of smart agriculture at a community/campus farm: a participatory experience. Journal of Science Communication, 21(2)A02, 1-15.

Metcalfe, J., Gascoigne, T., Medvecky, F., & Nepote, A. C. (2022). Participatory science communication for transformation. Journal of Science Communication, 21(2)E, 1-11.

Monikha, C. R., Balasubramaniam, M., & Sukumar, J. (2021). Effectiveness of extension tools among the paddy farmers of Tenkasi district of Tamil Nadu. Indian Journal of Extension Education, 57(1), 110-113.

Moumeni-Helali, H., & Ahmadpour, A. (2013). Impact of Farmers’ Field School approach on knowledge, attitude and adoption of rice producers toward biological control: The case of Babol Township, Iran. World Applied Sciences Journal, 21(6), 862-868.

Nain, M. S. (2003). Effectiveness of farm magazine: A comparative analysis of various components as viewed by the readers. Rajasthan Journal of Extension Education, 11, 9-15.

Nain, M. S., Singh, R., Sharma, J. P., & Mishra, J. R. (2019) Filling the information gap through developing and validating entrepreneurial technical information packages (ETIPs) for potential agricultural entrepreneurs. Journal of Community Mobilization and Sustainable Development, 14(1), 44-48.

Ongachi, W., Onwonga, R., Nyanganga, H., Wangia, S., Chimoita, E., & Okry, F. (2018). Farmers’ knowledge, attitude, and perception of video mediated learning vis-à-vis Farmer Field School on Striga weed management in Western Kenya. International Journal of Education and Development using Information and Communication Technology, 14(2), 195-210.

Panda, S., Modak, S., Devi, Y. L., Das, L., Pal, P. K., & Nain, M. S. (2019). Access and usage of Information and Communication Technology (ICT) to accelerate farmers’ income. Journal of Community Mobilization and Sustainable Development, 14(1), 200-205.

Red, F. S., Amestoso, N. T., & Casinillo, L. F. (2021). Effect of farmer field school (FFS) on the knowledge, attitude, practices and profitability of rice farmers. Philippine Social Science Journal, 4(4), 145-154.

Sastry, T. P., Sreenivasulu, S., & Jain, P. K. (2014). Evaluation of farmer field school (FFS) on groundnut in Chittoor district of Andhra Pradesh, India. IOSR Journal of Agriculture and Veterinary Science, 7(10-II), 70-71.

SDC. (2016). Communication for Development A practical guide, Swiss Agency for Development and Cooperation (SDC), Switzerland. Singh, G., Singh, P., Tiwari, D., & Singh, K. (2021). Role of social media in enhancing agricultural growth. Indian Journal of Extension Education, 57(2), 69-72.

Tripp, R., Wijertne, M., & Piyadasa, V. H. (2005). What should we expect from farmer field schools? A Sri Lanka case study. World Development, 33(10), 1705-1720.

Downloads

Published

2023-04-02

Issue

Vol. 59 No. 2 (2023): Indian Journal of Extension Education, (Apr-Jun), 2023

Section

Articles

License

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

How to Cite

Malik, N., & Dubey, S.K. (Trans.). (2023). Enhancing Effectiveness of Farm School through Community Wall Magazine (CWM): A Field Experimental Study. Indian Journal of Extension Education, 59(2), 65–68. https://doi.org/10.48165/IJEE.2023.59214
Crossref
Scopus
Google Scholar
Europe PMC