Yield Gaps and Scaling up of Sesame Variety (RT-351) in Potential Areas of Rajasthan
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.48165/IJEE.2023.59212Keywords:
Sesame, RT-351, Scaling up, Technology gap, Cluster front line demonstrations, Extension gapAbstract
The study evaluates the cluster front line demonstrations (CFLDs) conducted under the national food security mission on sesame (RT-351) by 26 KVKs of Rajasthan state. Four thousand one (4001) partner farmers responded to the study during 2016-2020. The CFLDs were undertaken in a 172.00 ha area in 26 districts during these five years. Yield gaps and technology index were calculated under the study. The result shows an extension gap of 1.35 q ha-1 and a technology gap of 2.78 q ha-1. The technology index was found to be 35.11 per cent, while a yield advantage of 36.17 per cent was found in CFLDs. KVKs of Rajasthan state could add Rs. 1.45 crores to the income of partner farmers. The improved variety & better extension services significantly enhanced production and productivity. Participatory approaches in the sesame seed supply chain and institutional linkage were critical for scaling up sustainable technology and improving farmers’ access to quality and sufficiently improved seeds. More capsules per plant and resistance to stem & root rot attracted the farmers. Technical backstopping, supplying of seed, and seed exchange through farmer-to-farmer extension were crucial on a sustainable basis. Regular monitoring by experts and farmers’ feedback is vital for sustained production and productivity improvement of the sesame crop.
Downloads
References
Anonymous. (2020). Food and Agriculture Organization Statistical Databases (FAOSTAT). Available online: http://faostat.fao.org/ (accessed on 29 June 2021).
Anonymous. (2020a). Agricultural statistics at a glance 2019. Directorate of Economics & Statistics, Department of Agriculture, Cooperation and Farmers Welfare, Ministry of Agriculture & Farmers Welfare, Government of India, New Delhi, pp. 315.
Kumbhare, N. V., Dubey, S. K., Nain, M. S., & Bahal, R. (2014). Micro analysis of yield gap and profitability in pulses and cereals. Legume Research- An International Journal, 37(5), 532-536.
Kushahwah, R. S., Kumar, R., Sharma, U. C., Bhadauria, N. S., Kushwaha, N. K., & Kumar, C. (2018). Impact of frontline demonstration technologies on sesame crop yield in Bhind district (MP). Indian Research Journal of Extension Education, 18(2), 97-100.
Linn, J. F., Hartmann, A., Kharas, H., Kohl, R., & Massler, B. (2010). Scaling up the fight against rural poverty. Working Paper 43. Brookings. Available at: www. brookings. edu/ wpcontent/uploads/2016/06/10_ifad_linn_kharas. pdf.
Mbure, G., & Sullivan, C. (2017). Improving the management of agriculture demonstration sites in food security programs: A practitioner’s guide. Washington, DC: World Vision.
Meena, M. S., Kale, R. B., Singh, S. K., & Rohilla, P. P. (2017). Performance of cluster frontline demonstrations on oilseeds in Rajasthan and Gujrat. ICAR-Agricultural Technology Application Research Institute, Jodhpur, technical report, 8/ 2017: pp 1-36.
Meena, M. S., Singh, S. K., & Meena, H. N. (2018). Cluster front line demonstrations under NMOOP: Efforts of KVKs of Rajasthan,
Haryana, and the Delhi states. ICAR-Agricultural Technology Application Research Institute, Jodhpur, annual report pp 1-42. Myint, D., Gilani, A., Kawase, M., & Watanabe, N. (2020). Sustainable sesame (Sesamum indicum L.) production through improved technology: An overview of production, challenges, and
opportunities in Myanmar. Sustainability, 12, 3515. Nain, M. S., Bahal, R., Dubey, S. K., & Kumbhare, N. V. (2014). Adoption gap as the determinant of instability in Indian legume production: Perspective and implications. Journal of Food Legumes, 27(2), 146-150.
Nain, M. S., Kumbhare, N. V., Sharma, J. P., Chahal, V. P., & Bahal, R. (2015). Status, adoption gap and way forward of pulse production in India. Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 85(8), 1017-1025.
Pannell, D. J., Marshall, G. R., Barr, N., Curtis, A., & Vanclay, F. (2006). Adoption of conservation practices by rural landholders. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture, 46(11), 1407- 1424.
Patil, S., Mahale, M., Chavan, S., & Shinde, V. (2018). Impact of frontline demonstrations on oilseed crops in Konkan region of Maharashtra. Indian Research Journal of Extension Education, 18(4), 30-36.
Patil, S., Mahale, M., Chavan, S., & Shinde, V. (2019). Impact of frontline demonstrations on oilseed crops in konkan region of Maharashtra. Indian Research Journal of Extension Education, 19(2), 70-76.
Rai, A.K., Kajuria, S., & Lata, K. (2012). Impact of FLDs on sesame production in Panchmahal district of Gujarat. Indian Journal of Extension Education, 48(3&4), 45-48.
Ranganatha, A. R. G., Jyotishi, A., Deshmukh, M. R., Bisen. R., Panday, A. K., Gupta, K. N., Jain, S., & Paroha, S. (2013). Improved technology for maximizing production of sesame. All India coordinated research project on sesame and niger, Indian Council of Agricultural Research, JNKVV Campus, Jabalpur. Available online: https://icariior.org.in/sites/default/files/ iiorcontent/pops/sesame.pdf (accessed on 25 January 2022).
Singh, A. K., Chauhan, R., Rikhari, Y. C., & Kumar, P. (2020). Evaluation of front-line demonstration on the mustard crop in Bundelkhand Zone. Indian Journal of Extension Education, 56(1), 18-22.
Singh, K. K., Singh, R. P. N., & Mishra, D. (2019). Evaluation of front-line demonstration of oilseeds in Raebareli district. Indian Journal of Extension Education, 55(3), 49-52.
Sri, G. A. L., Kumar, G. D. S., & Khan, M. A. (2022). Farmers’ characteristics effecting the yield gap in oilseed crops. Indian Research Journal of Extension Education, 22(5), 59-62.
Tripathi, A. K., & Singh, D. K. (2012). Performance and adoption of improved production technology of sesame (Sesamum indicum L.) in Bundelkhand region of Madhya Pradesh. Indian Journal of Extension Education, 48(3&4), 98-100.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
How to Cite
