Development of Reliability and Validity of Social Cohesiveness Rating Scale (SCRS)

Authors

  • Sanjenbam Sher Singh Ph.D. Scholar,College of Post Graduate Studies in Agricultural Sciences, Central Agricultural University (Imphal), Umiam, Meghalaya, India
  • Rajkumar Josmee Singh Assistant Professor, College of Post Graduate Studies in Agricultural Sciences, Central Agricultural University (Imphal), Umiam, Meghalaya, India
  • Loukham Devarani Associate Professor,College of Post Graduate Studies in Agricultural Sciences, Central Agricultural University (Imphal), Umiam, Meghalaya, India
  • L. Hemochandra Professor, School of Social Sciences, College of Post Graduate Studies in Agricultural Sciences, Central Agricultural University (Imphal), Umiam, Meghalaya, India
  • Ram Singh Professor, School of Social Sciences, College of Post Graduate Studies in Agricultural Sciences, Central Agricultural University (Imphal), Umiam, Meghalaya, India

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.48165/IJEE.2023.59129

Keywords:

SCRS, EFA, Reliability, Concurrent validity

Abstract

Natural Rubber is an important plantation crop and is gaining importance in North Eastern states of India due to increasing demand of rubber nationally and globally. Method of summated rating was administered in the construction of Social Cohesiveness Rating Scale (SCRS). Comprehensive literatures review and experts’ judgements were considered while identifying the item statements of SCRS. The scale was further standardized by establishing uni-dimensionality through administration of Exploratory Factor Analysis (EFA) using Principal Component with Varimax rotation to extract factors. The final scale consisted of 11 items. Spearman rank-order correlation coefficients (rs) on inter-rater reliability of the item statements range from 0.577 to 0.812. High concurrent validity as specified by rs = 0.75 (p < 0.01) signifies a good consideration on the validity of the SCRS to be administered in a research setting. 

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Cattell, R. B. (1966). The scree test for the number of factors. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 1, 245–276. http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1207/s15327906mbr0102_10

Churchill Jr, G. A. (1979). A paradigm for developing better measures of marketing constructs. Journal of Marketing Research, 16(1), 64-73.

Costello, A. B., & Osborne, J. W. (2005). Best practices in exploratory factor analysis: Four recommendations for getting the most from your analysis. Practical Assessment, Research and Evaluation, 10, 173-78.

Di-Iorio, C. K. (2005). Measurement in Health Behavior Methods for Research and Education, pp 186, First edition, Jossey-Bass, San Francisco.

Edward, A. L., & Kilpatrick, F. P. (1948). A technique for construction of attitude scales. Journal of Applied Psychology, 32, 374-384.

Edwards, A. L. (1957). Techniques of Attitude Scale Construction. pp. 13. Appleton Century Crofts, Ins, New York.

Floyd, F. J., & Widaman, K. F. (1995). Factor analysis in the development and refinement of clinical assessment instruments. Psychological Assessment, 7(3), 286.

Gupta, S. K., Nain, M. S., Singh, R., & Mishra, J. R. (2022). Development of Scale to Measure Agripreneurs Attitude towards Entrepreneurial Climate. Indian Journal of Extension Education, 58(2), 153–157.

Kaiser, H. F. (1960). The application of electronic computers to factor analysis. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 20, 141–151. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/001316446002000116

Likert, R. A. (1932). A technique for the measurement of attitude. Archives of Psychology, 22, 5-55.

National Rubber Policy. (2019). Department of Commerce, Government of India. https://commerce.gov.in/hi/wp- content/ uploads/sites/2/2020/02/NTESCL637038876015166279 _National-Rubber-Policy-2019_Hindi.pdf, assessed 2022.

Rubber Board Statistics. (2022). Rubber Board, Ministry of Commerce and Industry, Government of India, Kottayam. http:// rubberboard.org.in/rbfilereader?fileid=730, assessed 2022.

Rubber Board. (2022). Ministry of Commerce and Industry, Government of India, Kottayam. http://rubberboard.org.in/ rbfilereader?fileid=297, assessed 2022.

Singh, D., Kaur, P., & Singh, D. (2021). A standardized scale to measure the attitude of farmers towards zero-till drill. Indian Journal of Extension Education, 57(2), 11-18.

Singh, D., Kaur, P., & Singh, D. (2019). Comparative analysis of psychological characters of farmers adopting various resource conservation technologies. Indian Research Journal of Extension Education, 20(1), 61-66.

Thurstone, L. L., & Chave, E. J. (1929). The measurement of attitude. Chicago University Press, USA. pp 39-40. Wongpakaran, T., Wongpakaran, N., Intachote-Sakamoto, R., & Boripuntakul, T. (2013). The group cohesiveness scale (GCS) for psychiatric inpatients. Perspectives Psychiatric Care, 49, 58-64.

Downloads

Published

2022-12-30

Issue

Vol. 59 No. 1 (2023): Indian Journal of Extension Education, (Jan-Mar), 2023

Section

Research Tool

License

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

How to Cite

Singh, S.S., Singh, R.J., Devarani, L., Hemochandra, L., & Singh, R. (Trans.). (2022). Development of Reliability and Validity of Social Cohesiveness Rating Scale (SCRS). Indian Journal of Extension Education, 59(1), 139–141. https://doi.org/10.48165/IJEE.2023.59129
Crossref
Scopus
Google Scholar
Europe PMC