Crafting a Digital Divide Index for Assessing Agricultural Disparities Among Farmers: An Application of AHP Process

Authors

  • Saurabh Chandra Ph.D. Scholar, Department of Agricultural Extension & Communication, Institute Agricultural Sciences, Banaras Hindu University, Varanasi-221005, Uttar Pradesh, India
  • Kalyan Ghadei Professors, Department of Agricultural Extension & Communication, Institute Agricultural Sciences, Banaras Hindu University, Varanasi-221005, Uttar Pradesh, India
  • Waris Ali Ph.D. Scholar, Department of Agricultural Extension & Communication, Institute Agricultural Sciences, Banaras Hindu University, Varanasi-221005, Uttar Pradesh, India

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.48165/IJEE.2024.604RT2

Keywords:

Analytic hierarchy process, Digital agriculture, Information and communication technology, Digital divide, Index development

Abstract

a new measurement tool for assessing the digital divide disparity among farmers in e agriculture was devised during 2023-24. The index comprises four dimensions, namely ICT ownership, awareness, accessibility, and usage, respectively. For dimension selection, the researchers employed the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP). The maximum eigen value (ë max) of the pairwise comparison matrix was 4.0049, serving as the overall weight for the decision-making process. In the item selection process, Likert-type scale procedures were used to assess statements for final indicator selection. An interview schedule with 45 indicators was administered to 60 farmers in a non-sampling area, with five ambiguous indicators subsequently removed. The digital divide index customized for farmers demonstrated strong reliability, with a split-half reliability coefficient of 0.846 (Spearman-Brown formula) and a Pearson correlation coefficient of 0.733. Internal consistency was good, as indicated by a Cronbach’s Alpha of 0.813, and the test displayed strong validity with a score of 0.919. Overall, these findings confirm the reliability and validity of the test in measuring the intended construct. Ultimately, the 38 items were consolidated into a standardized farmers’ digital divide index for assessing agricultural disparities in the farming community.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Bardhan, T., Bhardwaj, N., Kashyap, S. K., Kameswari, V. L. V., Kuswaha, G. S., & Dey, A. (2023). Development of multi-dimensional scale to measure attitude of farmers towards conservation agricultural practices. Indian Journal of Extension Education, 59(1), 127-130.

Barzilai-Naho, K. (2006). Gaps and bits: Conceptualizing measurements for digital divide/s. The Information Society. http:// www.ischool.washington.

Chandra, S., & Singh, A. K. (2021). Socio-personal profile and problems faced by farmers of Banda district of Uttar Pradesh in using ICTs. International Journal of Current Microbiology and Applied Sciences, 10(3), 396-401.

Chandra, S., Kalyan, G., Chennamadhava, M., & Waris, A. (2024). Development and Validation of a Farmer’s Focused Digital Literacy Scale: A new measurement tool. Indian Journal of Extension Education, 60(1), 111-115.

Chandra, S., Singh, A. K., & Singh, S. K. (2021). Assessment of utilization of ICT tools for agricultural purposes by the farmers of Banda district of Uttar Pradesh. Indian Journal of Extension Education, 57(2), 186-189.

Chandra, S., Singh, A. K., Ghadei, K., & Pradhan, S. (2023). Exploring the relationship between socio-economic factors and ICT adoption among farmers. Indian Journal of Extension Education, 59(3), 54-57. DOI:10.48165/IJEE.2023.59310.

Correa, T., & Pavez, I. (2016). Digital Inclusion in rural areas: a qualitative exploration of challenges faced by isolated communities. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 21(2016), 247–263.

Cortina, J. M. (1993). What is coefficient alpha? An examination of theory and applications. Journal of Applied Psychology, 78(1), 98-104.

Cronbach, L. J. (1951). Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. Psychometrika, 16(3), 297-334.

Dalwai, A. (2018). Report of the Committee on Doubling Farmers’ Income- Empowering the Farmers through Extension and Knowledge Dissemination. GOI, New Delhi, Vol. XI.

DeVellis, F. Robert (2003). Scale development theory and application. Sage Publication, Inc. California in applied social research methods series, 26, 27-49.

Edwards, A. L. (1957). Techniques of Attitude Scale Construction. Vakils, Feffer and Simons Inc. New York.

Hennessy, T., Lapple, D., & Moran, B. (2016). The digital divide in farming: a problem of access or engagement? Applied Economic Perspectives and Policy, 38(3), 474–491.

Jairu, D., Chauhan, A., & Kameswari, V. (2023). Development and standardization of household food and nutritional security index. Indian Journal of Extension Education, 59(4), 150-153.

Khalkho, R., & Ghosh, S. (2023). Crafting a gender disparity index to unveiling the tea garden workers’ gender dynamics. Indian Journal of Extension Education, 59(4), 145-149.

Khandare, S. S., & Gawade, S. (2017). Information communication technology with digital India in agriculture domain. International Journal of Modern Trends in Engineering & Science, 4(2), 41-45.

Kumar, R., Kumar, S., & Chahal, P. (2023). Information and Communication Technologies (ICTs) implementation. Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 93(1), 119–121.

Nunnally, J. C. (1978). Psychometric theory. McGraw-Hill. Perguna, L. A., Sanah, B. F., Irawan, L. Y., & Widianto, A. A. (2021). Bridging digital divide and rural e-Government (Smart Kampung): Evidence from Banyuwangi, Indonesia. Library Philosophy and Practice, 6561. Retrieved from https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/ libphilprac/6561.

Podvezko, V. (2009). Application of AHP technique. Journal of Business Economics and Management, 10(2), 181-189.

Polit, D. F., & Beck, C. T. (2006). The content validity index: Are you sure you know what’s being reported? Critique and recommen dations. Research in Nursing & Health, 29(5), 489-497.

Popova, L., Nuttunen, P. A., Kanavtsev, M. V., & Serditov, V. A. (2019). The impact of the digital divide on the development of socioeconomic systems. International Agro-Science Conference, IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 433(2020), 012022. DOI:10.1088/1755-1315/433/1/012022

Prasad, K., Sankhala, G., Niketha, L., Kant, K., & Maji, S. (2016). An index to measure sustainability of sugarcane based dairy farming. Indian Journal of Dairy Science, 69(3), 368.

Reddy, D. A., Garai, S., Maiti, S., Manjunath, K. V., Panja, A., & Sahani, S. (2023). Construction of scale to measure women farmers’ attitude towards climate resilient dairy farming practices. Indian Journal of Extension Education, 59(3), 141-144.

Revenko, L. S., & Revenko, N. S. (2022). Digital divide and digital inequality in global food systems. Vestnik, RUDN. International Relations, 22(2), 372–384.

Roy, H., Jirli, B., & Maji, S. (2022). Measuring the role performance of farmer producer companies: an index development perspective. Indian Research Journal of Extension Education, 22(3), 97-108.

Singh, M. P. (2004). Information Technology and the Digital Divide in India: Ethical Perspectives. International Journal of Technology, 46(1&2), 34-44.

Published

2024-09-30

How to Cite

Chandra, S., Ghadei, K., & Ali, W. (Trans.). (2024). Crafting a Digital Divide Index for Assessing Agricultural Disparities Among Farmers: An Application of AHP Process . Indian Journal of Extension Education, 60(4), 118–122. https://doi.org/10.48165/IJEE.2024.604RT2